Thứ Hai, 16 tháng 10, 2017

Youtube daily which Oct 16 2017

Why are Plastic Bags a Problem?

They are harmful to the environment.

Takes 1000 years to decompose into smaller pieces, which seep down into the soil and

release chemicals, which eventually reach the water supply.

Kills animals in the water when they eat plastic bags thinking they are jellyfish

Builds up in landfills Manufacturing of plastic bags is harmful to

the environment because nonrenewable resources are used (petroleum and natural gas).

The manufacturing process itself uses toxic chemicals, pollutes the atmosphere and consumes

energy.

The transportation of the billions of plastic bags produced annually means further energy

consumption, largely in the form of more petroleum.

Stores give out unlimited amounts of plastic bags for FREE even when the costumer doesnt

really need one Cost in terms of energy and manpower is greater

than the value of the material produced

SHOPPING CULTURE IN EARLIER DAYS

Before the advent of poly-bags, people did shop, buy things, bring eatables from the

market, and did the same marketing as is done now.

How did they did it?

The raw material for the bag was decided by its usage.

Cloth bags for lighter items, Gunny bags/Jute bags for voluminous and heavier goods.

The cost did not justify use and discard attitude.

These bags were washable and reusable lasting for six months to a year.

For more infomation >> Which Bags did people use before 21st century | Plastic Problems| Part-1 | #Say No to Plastic - Duration: 1:49.

-------------------------------------------

Which Liquids Are Allowed With Intermittent Fasting? - Duration: 4:46.

So in today's video I'm just going to talk about what the appropriate liquids

for fasting are. Now I get asked this question a lol, like a lot! So I think

it's about time to make a video and I just briefly clarify what you can have

and what you can't have, so, first of all let's just define what fasting is. Now

there's there's two definitions. The first is complete abstinence from foods

so nothing at all and people call this a dry fast (not even water), right, and this

is something I don't advocate it all. And some people will define fasts

as eating a little bit of food, 300, 400 calories per day. Basically

the way I like to look at it and I suggest you do is a fast is little to no

calories and if you're gonna consume any calories at all, they should be the

least insulinogenic - meaning they hardly spike insulin. Now that

macronutrient is fat, right? So protein turns to sugar through gluconeogenesis,

so it increases your blood sugar and it spikes your insulin, sugar and

carbohydrates which are basically sugar increase your insulin and increase

blood sugar. Fat doesn't really do this, but anything you eat is going to

increase your insulin, right? Because it's not necessarily the food that you're

eating per se, it's the reaction of your stomach (that's called the cephalic

response), so when your stomach kind of responds to food or even before you eat

the food insulin is secreted so the body's ready to properly shuttle

the sugar throughout cells and tissue in the body. So basically having coffee

is okay, having tea is okay, having sugar free gum is okay, having a little bit of

cream in your coffee is fine, a little bit of cream... anything under twenty or

thirty calories, a little bit of butter is fine if you eat that, MCT oil is

great I mean you're gonna elevate your ketone levels which can be great if

you're trying to get into ketosis, generally a little bit of fat

is gonna be fine, as long as you're not having like eight coffees per day. So if

you're having one or two coffees per day and you add in a bit of MCT oil or you

add in a bit of full fat milk - just a tiny bit - then that's fine you're only

having two servings of that across 16 hours or whatever. But if you're

having eight coffees a day and each one has some butter in it or cream that

could be like 80 calories each time and that can be the equivalent of like two

full meals of worth of calories in your fasting period and clearly that's not

"fasting", right? That's more classified as a "fat fast". So that's basically it.

Anything with sugar so gum with sugar or sugar in your coffee or tea, no, not even

a little bit because your insulin is just gonna go up, even with a tiny

bit, it's just gonna go up and you really are not fasting and getting the benefits

of fasting when you do that. But a tiny bit of butter, a tiny bit of MCT oil

and you're still gonna get the benefits of that increased insulin sensitivity

which you want, autophagy is still going to take place after a enough time

even with a little bit of butter in your coffee or cream. BDNF (brain-derived

neurotrophic factor) is gonna increase, you're gonna get all of the

main benefits. So don't be worried about putting a bit of cream in your coffee.

Ideally if you can withstand the taste have your coffee black, you know? It's

gonna be better. Just drink water, just drink a plain tea, but if you really

really really have to then it's fine and it's not gonna be a problem. So that's

the video we just wanted to clarify that. And yeah hopefully you got something

out of it hopefully this answers your question and if you already knew the

answer to this and you're still watching then thanks for watching anyway and

thanks for the support. So until next time guys I'll see you

later. Be sure to comment down below and subscribe to the channel to see

more content on nutrition and fitness.

Alright, until next time guys, see ya!

For more infomation >> Which Liquids Are Allowed With Intermittent Fasting? - Duration: 4:46.

-------------------------------------------

Look Which Hollywood Celeb Finally Left America Liberals Breathe A Sigh Of Relief!!! - Duration: 11:59.

Look Which Hollywood Celeb Finally Left America Liberals Breathe A Sigh Of Relief

disgraced film producer Harvey Weinstein is reportedly headed to a rehab center

in Arizona according to TMZ Weinstein took off in a private jet Wednesday

evening bound for Wickenburg Arizona no word on where he will be receiving

treatment but the nearby Meadows rehab center is equipped to deal with sex

addiction issues while previous reports indicated that the 65 year old was going

to leave the country for treatment TMZ says the plans were scrapped as his team

wanted him to receive therapy within the country as for a state of mind Weinstein

was caught by paparazzi outside his daughter's house on Wednesday afternoon

and he says he's not doing okay this comes as a growing number of

actresses are coming forward with accusations of sexual harassment and

assault Weinstein took a jab at those women

telling photographers and you know what I've always been loyal to you guys

adding I've always been the good guy first obviously was fired by his own

company after the New York Times reported sexual harassment allegations

against him over three decades which he denies then came Ronin Pharaohs

devastating New Yorker article in which three women on the record say the movie

mogul raped them which again he denies now more accusers are merging just about

every day not just actresses but journalists like Laurence Yvonne and

that's where he cornered me in this vestibule and leaned in and and tried to

kiss me which I immediately rebuffed and said whoa whoa whoa he immediately

exposed himself and you know began pleasuring himself and I just stood

there dumbfounded Weinstein is a major Democratic donor and it took nearly six

days for Barack Obama to say he and Michelle were disgusted and quote any

man who do means and degrades women and such fashion needs to be condemned and

held accountable regardless of wealth or status and for Hillary Clinton to say

she was shocked and appalled by Harvey Weinstein his good Clinton broke her

silence of course it is too bad she was one of the last to do so I just don't

understand why the day this came out she wasn't on Twitter condemning it it's

just it doesn't make any sense to me the fact that the Clintons in the Obama

embraced him I think is a dark mark on their record the former first lady

finally spoke about it publicly on seeing it what was your reaction when

you heard the news about Harvey Weinstein I was I was just sick I was

shocked I was appalled it was something that was just intolerable in every way

joining us now to analyze the coverage guy Benson political editor of

townhall.com Jessica tarlof senior director at bustled both are foxnews

contributors and Erin McPike White House correspondent for Independent Journal

review Fareed Zakaria didn't ask Hillary Clinton the obvious question what took

you so long he didn't he did ask her about giving back some of the money that

she'd taken from Weinstein and she said she's gonna bundle that into her yearly

charitable giving it's unclear where that would go or if it's on top of her

normal 10% as she described I do think that there's a question for Democrats

more broadly is the party going to divest from this tainted money from

Harvey Weinstein movie media are pressing that question who are kind of

going easy on the wealth so the DNC put out this ridiculous charade of a policy

which was they're going to give away 10% of it two groups devoted to electing

Democrats which is basically the DNC and they got some positive headlines for it

saying oh they're giving away the money if the media is that easily fooled then

shame on them there should be more pressure on that front Jessica I'm glad

that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama now speaking out against Harvey

Weinstein but it's hard to avoid the conclusion they were being uber cautious

because Weinstein is not just a big-time Democratic donor he threw fundraisers

for them yeah absolutely I mean the actual cash amount that came directly

from Harvey Weinstein was quite minimal compared but he certainly has been a

great friend of the Democratic Party and liberal causes I mean even his first

ridiculous letter said I'm gonna focus my attention now on the NRA like as if

you know we want him with us in any way whatsoever to a larger point here I

think the Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were late to the game and I

think that more that the issue is not what we're gonna do with the money but

what we're going to do actually with the ideology because I believe strongly in

the values of the Democratic Party being champions of women

I believe our policies are better for women across the board and if we're not

the first to the fire on issues like this I think that it's hard for us to

stand up there and say that Republicans are sometimes reluctant one of the

conservative gets into this type of trouble but when Harvey Weinstein didn't

because he was kicked out of the Academy Awards yesterday should cut of course

partisan lines right yeah it absolutely should no I don't think six days is all

that long but I do know that people who tend to defend Clinton on television on

Twitter in the press were waiting for a response and we're kind of frustrated

that the Clinton team wasn't giving them one there were stories about what

awareness hell are we gonna speak about this if it had been some big Republican

donor you were taken six minutes six hours at the most

well look that's true but Hillary Clinton is no longer running for

president and people do want her to go away and President Obama is no longer

president so yeah but she is on a book tour all right so and how does NBC let

Ronan Farrow who got a number of women to go on the wack record three of them

accusing Harvey Weinstein of rape which again he denies anything non-consensual

Pharos is special correspondent and with NBC former MSNBC host how do you let him

walk away with that scoop so as a disclosure I'm friends with Ronan and I

thought that he gathered based on just what we know publicly he gathered a lot

of factual reportable information on this story over many months eight women

on the record the pushback he got internally from NBC is shocking and

we've seen the dribs and drabs coming out from within the building people

angry at NBC at their own network for basically giving up this scoop and

chasing him off to The New Yorker which has very high editorial standards and

they ran the piece so I think this looks terrible for NBC News and I do want to

very quickly give some credit to Rachel Maddow which I don't often do you played

the clip at the top of the show she asked him and pressed him on that issue

on an NBC owned metwork good for her it was the elephant in the room and she

didn't let it go I just want to play for you Jessica one piece of audiotape this

is something Ronan Fowler had months ago because there's some dispute about how

many of them did he have on the record at the time he was still doing the story

for NBC so this is Ambra battle Anagha Tara is a model who

two years ago had said that she was groped by Harvey wines and the day

before she wore a wire in a New York police sting let's listen he's coming

now and one minute as you want to leave when

the guy comes with Mike please I'm sorry just

he amidst the groping on the tape how is that by itself not a story for NBC I

don't know and I don't know what science was thinking either when he declined to

process but adding on to what guy was talking about NBC also got scooped on

the Access Hollywood tape because they waited on this wooded Trump right so

clearly there are some problems there at the top at NBC about their decision you

know to not go forward with these huge stories and stories the American people

need to be hearing about whether it's the president the United States of

America or it's someone that's running Hollywood so I've worked at both NBC and

CNN both of their news departments the Access Hollywood table you know I don't

know that we can say that the actual news department knew of the Access

Hollywood tape but I think that's that's up for debate but look networks kill

stories all of the time it is frustrating at every Network CNN does

not have a leg to stand on to go after NBC for not running that story and my my

suspicion is that it had a lot more to do with the fact that they thought oh

Ronan Farrow grew grew up in Hollywood and he is young and they probably wanted

to make him a star but didn't necessarily believe in his journalistic

chops there's a lot of that that could have been going on show though and I

mean Ronan Farrow said that he had to go out and spend his own money to do some

of this video for a crew because NBC wouldn't support don't hire him in the

first place if you don't think he has the chops to do it just briefly what do

you say CNN doesn't have a look at this thing because I know they kill stories

I've seen it happen all right we'll have to come back to that

sometimes in fairness NBC News president Noah Oppenheim told his staff and the

network put this out that it was offensive that anyone would think NBC

was covering up for a powerful person and that in his view we Ronan Farrow

story wasn't ready for primetime at the time he was dealing NBC but of course

weeks later this incredibly well documented piece shows up in The New

Yorker all right so do you think that too many journalists have perpetuated

the myth of Harvey Weinstein the mighty movie mogul the guy who makes stars the

guy who wins Oscars wall basically looking away from conduct that we're

hearing more more was an open secret in New York and Hollywood yeah and you know

one element of this story that I've been fascinated by is the late-night

comedians who jumped all over stories about

oh I don't know people at our network who got into trouble along these lines

and we hang out against Trump rendered on Trump regularly so look this

is obviously harassment a problem not just in Hollywood but elsewhere

it's the gusto and the immediacy with which some of these people went after in

the media and in comedy after some targets but not others and some of the

excuses now from Jimmy Kimmel and Seth Meyers explaining why they pulled their

punches to me do not hold water at all and I think it's there's some human

nature here going after friends and going after people who are powerful in

your orbit is difficult that's the truth to power NBC has business relationships

with NBC Universal Pictures and Bravo with Weinstein companies and that sort

of thing now it is hard though to nail down and

document these kinds of things where often two people in a room and I'm not

being in critical in any way of the women and particularly those who are

young aspiring actresses for not speaking out but you have to have people

who are willing to go on the record before you can report these kind of

explosive charges right that's why everyone on both sides of the aisle

should be praising these women who did find the courage to do that and yes it

took some of them a few years to make sure that they had established their

careers and they had the legs to stand on to do it but the audio came out of

Courtney Love back in 2005 saying don't work for her be Weinstein this was gonna

happen you and see a band her lifetime band so when people blame the women and

I have been on other panels about this where my opponent has come out and said

these women knew Meryl Streep knew you know Jane Fonda in ministry knew a year

ago don't you dare talk about those women and put them down for what they

did when you see what happened to a Courtney Love and this sets up my

question to you which is New York Times columnist Jim Ruttenberg wrote about

this that there's a network of a very aggressive public relations people and

lawyers who guard the secrets of those who they work for and that they keep

this stuff out of public view and then only major news organization New York

Times New Yorker which have the lawyers and factors can take this on well that's

right and look a lot of very wealthy entities or people when they foresee a

crisis happening will bring on a public relations firm so

that they can fend off the sort of thing which obviously we know happened with

Harvey Weinstein before he was trying to stop the near time stone by the way

Harvey Weinstein on the cover of Time magazine looking like a villain which is

pretty much always been cast producer predator pariah

For more infomation >> Look Which Hollywood Celeb Finally Left America Liberals Breathe A Sigh Of Relief!!! - Duration: 11:59.

-------------------------------------------

Mortal Kombat: Which is the Best Version for Ed Boon ? Mega Drive or Super Nintendo ? - Duration: 1:29.

Which is the Best Version for Ed Boon of the Mortal Kombat ? Mega Drive (Genesis) or Super Nintendo ?

For more infomation >> Mortal Kombat: Which is the Best Version for Ed Boon ? Mega Drive or Super Nintendo ? - Duration: 1:29.

-------------------------------------------

'DWTS' Predictions: Which Season 25 Pair Will Be Eliminated In Week 5? - Duration: 2:54.

'DWTS' Predictions: Which Season 25 Pair Will Be Eliminated In Week 5?

The tears were flowing all over the ballroom during Most Memorable Year night on Dancing With the Stars, and the sad moments didnt end, especially after Derek Fisher and Sharna Burgess were forced to say their goodbyes following their elimination.

Now, teams will perk back up again for Disney night—though one more of them will still need to face the harsh reality of potential elimination.

The leaderboard was truly changed after the most recent night of competition on the ABC series. While Jordan Fisher and Lindsay Arnold firmly planted themselves in first place with 29 total judges points, Victoria Arlen and Val Chmerkovskiy found themselves in second place for the first time, with 27 points.

Lindsey Stirling and Mark Ballas also remained near the top, taking third place with 26 points. The rest of the leaderboard saw teams almost entirely grid-locked for fourth place, with almost everyone else scoring 24 points from the judges.

Because of this new leaderboard, which sees the teams all within sight of the top spot, truly predicting which Season 25 pair is going home in Week 5 seems almost impossible.

However, one team in particular does seem like the most likely candidates to be eliminated when the judges scores and viewer votes are combined.

Though nearly every team in the competition that didnt crack the top 3 scored 24 points, putting them in a dead heat in terms of the judges scores, one pair didnt quite make the cut, and fell to the bottom of the leader board for the first time, scoring only 22 points.

In addition, Nick Lachey and Peta Murgatroyd, also known as Team Mom and Pops, have also found themselves in jeopardy of elimination twice before throughout the competition.

Overall, that doesnt seem to speak well for them, and could be a big sign that they not only havent quite earned as much admiration from the judges, but also viewers.

However, while they do seem to be the most likely contenders for elimination, being in jeopardy doesnt necessarily mean the pair received some of the lowest numbers of votes from viewers.

Though the show used to always leave the elimination down to the official bottom two teams of the week, the switch to putting teams in jeopardy meant that only one was guaranteed to have the lowest total of votes.

The twist allowed for top contenders to occasionally be among the last teams called safe as well, instead of leaving them to always move on to the next week.

Because of that, while Nick and Peta are definitely still in potential trouble due to their judges scores, they arent necessarily receiving the lowest number of viewer votes.

That could lend them a small cushion over some of the other teams who have stayed near the middle of the pack, meaning that they will be able to dance in Week 6.

If that does wind up being true, it truly could be any of the other teams who find themselves eliminated. If it is one of them, it will most certainly be a massive surprise to the entire cast, because things are truly exceptionally close between the teams.

Dancing With the Stars airs Mondays at 8 p.m. EDT on ABC.

For more infomation >> 'DWTS' Predictions: Which Season 25 Pair Will Be Eliminated In Week 5? - Duration: 2:54.

-------------------------------------------

Why does it matter which attorney I hire? Aren't they all basically the same? - Duration: 1:02.

Not all attorneys are the same.

Different attorneys have different experience.

Different attorneys have different skill levels, and different attorneys handle cases differently.

You need someone who's going to be a good fit for you.

Certainly they need to have the necessary experience, they need to know how to handle

cases like yours, and have done cases like yours before, but they also need to be compassionate.

They need to listen to you, they need to pay attention to you, they need to answer your questions,

and they need to respect and honor the fact that you have only one case and that

it really matters to you.

You need to hire an attorney who does that for you.

At Nelson Boyd we handle cases well for our clients.

We understand what it means to them.

We work closely as a team with them, and we listen to them and answer their questions

every step of the way to get them the fair and full compensation that they are entitled to.

Give us a call.

Let us talk about your case.

We would like to help you.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét