Youtube daily which Oct 12 2017

North Korea has reiterated the regime's principle stance that it will NEVER agree to ANY talks

on its nuclear weapons.

The regime's top diplomat also warns that President Trump "lit the wick of war" with

his infamous speech to the UN General Assembly.

Our Kim Hyo-sun has more.

North Korea's Foreign Minister Ri Yong-ho insists his country will never sit down for

talks in which the regime's nuclear weapons are up for negotiation.

This is according to Russia's state-run TASS news agency on Wednesday,... after its delegation

sat down with the regime's top diplomat in Pyongyang.

It also quoted Ri as saying the United States must act reasonably and stop provoking North

Korea,... highlighting that Washington must put an end to its hostile policies against

the North.

Ri also said President Trump had (quote) "lit the wick of war" with North Korea,... referring

to his address at the UN General Assembly last month,... during which he said the United

States would "totally destroy" Pyongyang if necessary.

The North Korean minister then explained that the regime is nearing its goal of achieving

full nuclear capability to counter any U.S. threat,... calling it (quote) "real balance

of power with Washington."

And speaking about South Korea's new Moon Jae-in administration,... Ri pointed out that

inter-Korean relations will remain frosty for as long as Seoul supports the U.S. and

pressures Pyongyang with sanctions.

Kim Hyo-sun, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> North Korea will not hold talks in which its nukes are subject of negotiations: Ri Yong-ho - Duration: 1:31.

-------------------------------------------

Nafta talks hit by new American demands which threaten to stall progress - Duration: 3:48.

Nafta talks hit by new American demands which threaten to stall progress

Prime Minister Trudeau will meet and trade-focused US politicians on the North American Free Trade Agreement while hundreds of negotiators, government officials and lobbyists from Canada, Mexico and the United States descend on a hotel in Arlington, Virginia for a fourth round of talks.

The Canadian leaders visit comes amid increasing acrimony over Nafta renegotiations, with President Trump making fresh threats to terminate the 23-year-old agreement and the US Chamber of Commerce yesterday accusing Trump's administration of trying to sabotage the talks with "poison pill proposals".  Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Videgaray warned that an end to Nafta would mark a breaking point in US-Mexican relations and affect bilateral cooperation in non-trade areas.  The Nafta talks are likely to stall in the face of aggressive US demands to sharply increase content requirements for cars and car parts, trade experts say.

The Washington round promises to be difficult, with Mexican sources saying the talks are expected to be extended by two days to October 17.  People briefed on the US proposals said that the North American content threshold for automotive would rise to 85 per cent from the current 62.5 percent, with a 50 per cent US-specific content requirement.  "These will be met with widespread opposition from Canada and Mexico.

I think its just a bridge too far," said Wendy Cutler, the Asia Societys Washington policy director and former chief US negotiator for the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal cancelled by President Trump.  Other contentious US proposals opposed by Canada, Mexico and US business interests include a five-year sunset provision, radical changes to Nafta's dispute arbitration systems, changes to intellectual property provisions and new protections for US seasonal produce growers.

In his meeting with President Trump, Prime Minister Trudeau is expected to remind the president that Canada is the United States' biggest export customer, with largely balanced two-way goods and services trade, and is not the cause of US manufacturing jobs lost under Nafta, Canadian officials said.

  Mexico has that distinction, with far lower wages that have lured US auto plants and other manufacturers across its northern border, resulting in a $64 billion trade surplus with the United States last year that Trump administration officials have vowed to slash.

  Prime Minister Trudeau in April urged President Trump not to withdraw from Nafta due to the pain it would cause on both sides of the border.

For more infomation >> Nafta talks hit by new American demands which threaten to stall progress - Duration: 3:48.

-------------------------------------------

CSGO | WHICH ONE IS GIVING HIGHER FPS ??! NEW VS OLD DUST 2 - Duration: 1:50.

NEW

VS

OLD

THE WINNER

IS

OLD

For more infomation >> CSGO | WHICH ONE IS GIVING HIGHER FPS ??! NEW VS OLD DUST 2 - Duration: 1:50.

-------------------------------------------

"WHAT" or "WHICH"? Learn how to choose! - Duration: 9:17.

Hi. I'm Rebecca from engVid.

In the next few minutes you will learn how to ask better questions in English.

Specifically, you'll learn when to use the question word "what" and when to use the question

word "which".

Now, is there a difference?

Yes, usually there is, and it's a very easy difference to understand once I explain it

to you.

But maybe you already know the difference, maybe you already know when to use "what"

or "which".

Let's find out.

So, do we say: "What colour do you like?" or should we say: "Which colour do you like?"

Think about that for a minute, decide something.

I'll tell you in a second.

And here, do we say: "What colour do you prefer - red or blue?" or do we say: "Which colour

do you prefer - red or blue?"

Think about that.

Got your answer?

Okay, so let me tell you what we would usually say.

Here we would usually say: "What colour do you like?"

Why?

Because we're asking: "Out of all the colours in the world, what colour do you like?"

And here, we would usually say: "Which", okay?

"Which colour do you prefer - red or blue?"

Why?

Because here we have a specific choice.

All right?

So let me summarize what the difference is.

Okay?

So, when we use "What", we use "What" to talk about things that are very broad or very general.

So here, we used it to talk about general questions or very wide, broad questions.

Okay?

Where the number of options, the number of possibilities are unknown or very large.

Okay?

"Which" is much different, it's much more specific.

Okay?

So, we use "Which" when we have limited options, not wide.

We use it when we have much more limited options.

For example, here we said: "Red or blue?"

It doesn't have to be only two.

It could be three, four, it could be 10, but it's limited and not unlimited.

That's the difference.

"What" is used when we're asking about something general, and "Which" is used when we're asking

about something specific.

Now, just to explain, in this one, for example, I said that the probable answer is: "What

colour do you like?"

But if I showed you a card which had four colours, and now it's limited, right?

So then I could ask you: "Which colour do you like?" because it's out of these four,

so it becomes limited and not: What colour out of all the colours in the world?

Okay?

So, let's look at a few more examples so you can understand exactly how this works.

All right, so let's look at some examples in a social context, in an academic context,

and in a business context.

Okay?

So, for example, we could ask someone: "What do you want to do today?"

Very general question.

Out of all the things we could possibly do in this city, what do you want to do?

Very broad.

Right?

Or: "Which movie do you want to see - Star Wars or Batman?"

Now the choice is much more limited.

Right?

It's more specific, and that's why we used "Which".

Do you see the difference between the broad and the narrow, between the general and the

specific?

All right, academically we could ask someone: "What would you like to learn?"

Okay?

Out of all the subjects in the world, what would you like to learn?

So very general, very broad.

Or: "Which class do you prefer - music or art?"

Now, of course, again our choice is very limited between two.

Again, the choice might be between more.

All right?

But here it's two.

In a business context we might ask: "What are our options?"

Okay?

Out of all the different things we could do, what are our options?

This is a very common question people ask in business situations, in business meetings,

negotiations, and things like that.

Right?

Or: "Which conference are you attending, the one in New York or in London?"

Again, a much more limited choice, and therefore we used "Which".

All right?

So, are you ready to try some on your own?

Let's do that.

Okay, number one, let's pretend that you're on a date and you want to get to know the

other person so you ask them: "_______ kind of music do you like?"

What should we say: "What" or "Which"?

It's a very general question, right?

So we say:

"What", "What kind of music do you like?"

Okay?

Because there are all kinds of music; we didn't limit the options.

All right, the next one, let's say you're thinking about learning how to play an instrument,

so you go to a music store and you ask the salesperson: "_______ instrument is easier

to learn - the guitar or the piano?"

What do we say there?

What should we say?

I think we should say:

"Which". Right? "Which instrument is easier to learn - the guitar or the piano?"

Again, limited choice so we're going to say: "Which".

The next one, you bump into your classmate in university and she asks you: "_______ course

was more interesting - sociology or psychology?"

What's the right question word to use here?

Should be, again: "Which" because we have limited possibilities.

Next, your rich uncle wants to give you a birthday present so he calls you and he asks

you: "_______ kind of computer do you want?"

What is the right word to use here?

Think about it.

"What". Okay? This is a general question, there are no specific possibilities mentioned.

It's out of all the different kinds of computers, and he's rich, your uncle's rich, he wants

to buy you something, so he says: "What kind of computer do you want, sweetheart?

I'll get you anything you want."

Okay.

All right.

Next, you want to make a hotel reservation and the reservation clerk asks you: "_______

room would you prefer - with an ocean view or a city view?"

Okay?

So what's the right question word to use here?

Yeah?

You got it.

"Which room", right?

Once again, we have specific, limited possibilities.

And the last one, you're in an ESL school and your friend asks you: "So, _______ exam

do you have to take - the IELTS or the TOEFL?"

What's the right question word to use here?

Also "Which" because, again, we had a specific choice.

All right?

So, I hope you've got the hang of that.

But to be really sure once and for all-okay?-go to our website at www.engvid.com to do a quiz

on this so that you really master this subject, and then after that you don't have to keep

thinking about it; you've got it in your head, it's very clear: "What" is for general questions,

"Which" is for specific questions, "What" is very general and very broad, and "Which"

is very specific. Okay?

And after that you've mastered that part. Okay?

And that's the way to move forward, one step at a time.

Master each little part of English until you master the whole language, which you can do.

Okay?

If you want to keep improving, please subscribe to my YouTube channel so you can get lots

more lessons with shortcuts and tips to help you move forward faster.

Okay? All right.

Thanks very much for watching, and all the best with your English. Bye for now.

For more infomation >> "WHAT" or "WHICH"? Learn how to choose! - Duration: 9:17.

-------------------------------------------

Look Which Hollywood Celeb Finally Left America—Trump Supporters Tell Her "And STAY Out!" - Duration: 29:36.

Look Which Hollywood Celeb Finally Left America—Trump Supporters Tell Her "And STAY Out!"

Not long ago, there were numerous celebrities making a certain promise.

They vowed that, should Donald Trump win the election, they would leave the United States.

Donald Trump did win.

How many left?

Oh right, zero.

But it looks like one of those celebs is finally making good on that promise.

At least for a little while.

Sadly, another country will suffer from this person's derangement.

From Daily Wire:

On Monday, extremely vocal anti-Trump celebrity Madonna announced that she has left the United

States to "conquer the world from a different vantage point": Portugal.

The performer said she'll be in the European country working on the set of a new film called

Loved and writing music.

"The energy of Portugal is so inspiring.

I feel very creative and alive here and I look forward to working on my film LOVED and

making New Music!!!" wrote the superstar on Instagram.

"This will be the next Chapter in My Book!

It's time to conquer the world from a different vantage point!!"

We're sure Trump supporters are not exactly distraught over the news.

As you might recall, Madge has frequently become unhinged over Donald Trump.

When the POTUS was the Republican nominee running against former Secretary of State

Hillary Clinton, for example, Madonna offered up an oral sex act known as The Lewinsky to

anyone who would vote for Queen Pantsuit…

Oh, and there was also that time the musical talent said she thinks "an awful lot about

blowing up the White House" now that President Trump is occupying it.

It seems like Madonna has been gradually losing her mind over the years.

Or she's been increasingly losing touch with normal, everyday people.

The fact that she talked about blowing up the White House, unafraid of the consequences

such a statement would bring, is proof enough of that.

She claims that she is going to Portugal to be creative from a "different vantage point."

Uh, sure.

Whatever that means.

Perhaps she's gotten fed up with the FBI knocking on her door for threatening the President.

Or maybe there are still people asking for oral sex because they voted for Hillary.

Or maybe she's just embarrassed over all the nonsensical claims she's made over the

course of this year.

Maybe not.

It's pretty nice to be able to drop everything and move to another country, eh Madonna?

Most of us can't enjoy that luxury.

Perhaps while you're there, you'll think about all the privilege you enjoy over everyone

else.

Maybe you'll learn not to be such an obnoxious idiot.

But probably not.

Source: Daily Wire

For more infomation >> Look Which Hollywood Celeb Finally Left America—Trump Supporters Tell Her "And STAY Out!" - Duration: 29:36.

-------------------------------------------

North Korea will not hold talks in which its nukes are subject of negotiations: Ri Yong-ho - Duration: 1:35.

Now to the latest exchange in the verbal tit-for-tat between the United States and North Korea.

Pyongyang has reiterated the regime's principle stance that it will NEVER agree to ANY talks

on its nuclear weapons.

The regime's top diplomat also warns that President Trump "lit the wick of war" with

his now infamous speech to the UN General Assembly.

Kim Hyo-sun reports.

North Korea's Foreign Minister Ri Yong-ho insists his country will never sit down for

talks in which the regime's nuclear weapons are up for negotiation.

This is according to Russia's state-run TASS news agency on Wednesday,... after its delegation

sat down with the regime's top diplomat in Pyongyang.

It also quoted Ri as saying the United States must act reasonably and stop provoking North

Korea,... highlighting that Washington must put an end to its hostile policies against

the North.

Ri also said President Trump had (quote) "lit the wick of war" with North Korea,... referring

to his address at the UN General Assembly last month,... during which he said the United

States would "totally destroy" Pyongyang if necessary.

The North Korean minister then explained that the regime is nearing its goal of achieving

full nuclear capability to counter any U.S. threat,... calling it (quote) "real balance

of power with Washington."

And speaking about South Korea's new Moon Jae-in administration,... Ri pointed out that

inter-Korean relations will remain frosty for as long as Seoul supports the U.S. and

pressures Pyongyang with sanctions.

Kim Hyo-sun, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> North Korea will not hold talks in which its nukes are subject of negotiations: Ri Yong-ho - Duration: 1:35.

-------------------------------------------

North Korea will not hold talks in which its nukes are subject of negotiations: Ri Yong-ho - Duration: 1:38.

Let's start with the latest exchange in the verbal tit-for-tat between the United States

and North Korea.

Pyongyang has reiterated the regime's principle stance that it will NEVER agree to ANY talks

on its nuclear weapons.

The regime's top diplomat also warns that President Trump "lit the wick of war" with

his now infamous speech to the UN General Assembly.

Kim Hyo-sun reports.

North Korea's Foreign Minister Ri Yong-ho insists his country will never sit down for

talks in which the regime's nuclear weapons are up for negotiation.

This is according to Russia's state-run TASS news agency on Wednesday,... after its delegation

sat down with the regime's top diplomat in Pyongyang.

It also quoted Ri as saying the United States must act reasonably and stop provoking North

Korea,... highlighting that Washington must put an end to its hostile policies against

the North.

Ri also said President Trump had (quote) "lit the wick of war" with North Korea,... referring

to his address at the UN General Assembly last month,... during which he said the United

States would "totally destroy" Pyongyang if necessary.

The North Korean minister then explained that the regime is nearing its goal of achieving

full nuclear capability to counter any U.S. threat,... calling it (quote) "real balance

of power with Washington."

And speaking about South Korea's new Moon Jae-in administration,... Ri pointed out that

inter-Korean relations will remain frosty for as long as Seoul supports the U.S. and

pressures Pyongyang with sanctions.

Kim Hyo-sun, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> North Korea will not hold talks in which its nukes are subject of negotiations: Ri Yong-ho - Duration: 1:38.

-------------------------------------------

North Korea will not hold talks in which its nukes are subject of negotiations: Ri Yong-ho - Duration: 1:37.

North Korea has reiterated the regime's principle stance that it will NEVER agree to ANY talks

on its nuclear weapons.

The regime's top diplomat also warns that President Trump "lit the wick of war" with

his infamous speech to the UN General Assembly.

Kim Hyo-sun reports.

North Korea's Foreign Minister Ri Yong-ho insists his country will never sit down for

talks in which the regime's nuclear weapons are up for negotiation.

This is according to Russia's state-run TASS news agency on Wednesday,... after its delegation

sat down with the regime's top diplomat in Pyongyang.

It also quoted Ri as saying the United States must act reasonably and stop provoking North

Korea,... highlighting that Washington must put an end to its hostile policies against

the North.

Ri also said President Trump had (quote) "lit the wick of war" with North Korea,... referring

to his address at the UN General Assembly last month,... during which he said the United

States would "totally destroy" Pyongyang if necessary.

The North Korean minister then explained that the regime is nearing its goal of achieving

full nuclear capability to counter any U.S. threat,... calling it (quote) "real balance

of power with Washington."

And speaking about South Korea's new Moon Jae-in administration,... Ri pointed out that

inter-Korean relations will remain frosty for as long as Seoul supports the U.S. and

pressures Pyongyang with sanctions.

Kim Hyo-sun, Arirang News.