It's incredibly hard, does not cutted
My body is made of superalloy.
Are you okay?
I don't know... If this is not work, you should go
You got away pretty far!
I don't miss that guy, It's no use, no load.
it is not so
Is it really rabbits in the first place?
Look at that, T-shirt from the front.
You look like a just stitched a T-shirt.
You idiot, you....
Why, What a t-shirt.
I don't know anything.
Who's a T-shirt? hem?
Of course yo...
Stop it! Stop it!
You're talking to someone. You should not look shallow to me!
If he hear a T-shirt, he change... It's dangerous...
I'm not done yet.
For more infomation >> (KOR/ENG Sub) #14「Little」 Bloody Bunny Don't Be My Enemy - Duration: 1:01.-------------------------------------------
you don't want to hear this sound - Duration: 0:22.
Check this out my dude, this is a sound which you profusely do never want to hear when operating on any sort of an engine thing.
ENGLAND IS MY CITY!! JAKE PAUL TEAM TEN GO! ENGLAND IS MY CITY!! JAKE PAUL TEAM TEN GO! ENGLAND IS MY CITY!! JAKE PAUL TEAM TEN GO! ENGLAND IS MY CITY!! JAKE PAUL TEAM TEN GO! ENGLAND IS MY CITY!! JAKE PAUL TEAM TEN GO! ENGLAND IS MY CITY!! JAKE PAUL TEAM TEN GO! ENGLAND IS MY CITY!! JAKE PAUL TEAM TEN GO! ENGLAND IS MY CITY!! JAKE PAUL TEAM TEN GO! ENGLAND IS MY CITY!! JAKE PAUL TEAM TEN GO! ENGLAND IS MY CITY!! JAKE PAUL TEAM TEN GO! ENGLAND IS MY CITY!! JAKE PAUL TEAM TEN GO! ENGLAND IS MY CITY!! JAKE PAUL TEAM TEN GO! ENGLAND IS MY CITY!! JAKE PAUL TEAM TEN GO!
-------------------------------------------
Un Posto al Sole anticipazioni: Franco e Don Peppino incastreranno Gaetano? - Duration: 3:29.
-------------------------------------------
#14 - Don't get too excited by the bank's unusually high FD interest rate (Full Version) - Duration: 9:50.
Welcome to Yap's Money life show. Thank you for your support and your interest.
Today I would like to talk about the unknown truth about bank's super high fixed deposit
interest rate. Now you see a client told me recently that 2 years
ago, his bank offered him a very high and attractive FD interest rate at 10%
on the condition that he also at the same time invest some of the money
into unit trust. So he thought this is a good deal. As long as he can get a high
10% fixed deposit interest rate, he would do anything. So what happened is that he
told me he took RM100,000 out from his fixed deposit then the
bank put RM25,000 of the RM100,000 into fixed deposit and
give him 10.5% interest per annum. And the balance RM75,000 of
the money is put into 1 equity fund with 5%
sales charge. What my client didn't know is that the bank actually takes half of the
5% sales charge that he paid to the bank and put this 2.5%
into his fixed deposit. That's how he is getting a high 10.5%
interest rate from his fixed deposit. So you see normally when you go for
the fixed deposit, you will be getting about 3% interest rate per
year. So the additional 7.5% that he is getting now is
actually coming from his own pocket. What is worse for my client is that he
doesn't even know much about this particular
equity fund that he invested into. He doesn't know how to manage this unit
trust fund. Whether it goes up, comes down, he didn't know what to do. At the end of one year,
the fund, the investment which is RM75,000 ended up to become
RM60,000. So, he didn't know what to do. That's why he just sold it at
loss. We can see here for the extra gain of 7.5% of FD
which is RM1,875 he ends up losing RM15,000
from his unit trust investment. So my suggestion to fellow viewers is that
when you are determined to grow your money with high certainty, always be
careful of unusual benefit being offered to you because there may be some hidden
risk, hidden disadvantages that you may
not be aware. So think twice, think 3 times before you invest into anything
that offers you super high interest, super high return.
In this section, I will answer the questions that I've received from
the viewers like you. Now I have a question
from Jerry. Jerry is from Sentul. His question goes like this,
I am going to retire soon, shall I settle all my property loans? Now Jerry to
answer your question, I will need to make an assumption and my assumption is
that you've got some money say for example RM1 million cash in the bank. So if you were
to take the cash that you have to settle all the loans that you have, of course,
you would have no more loan. That is good on one hand.
But if you were to need to take loan to invest into any new property, then the
bank may not give you a loan anymore because you are going to retire or you
you are retired. You don't have any active income anymore.
You see current effective loan interest rate for property
is about 4.5%. Based on track record, that is considered to be quite low
and quite cheap interest rate. So if you don't settle the loan and you find ways
to grow your RM1 million cash you have in the bank generating return about say
6% and above, then it is better return than you're getting compared to you take the
money to settle the loan which may saves you 4.5%.
When effective loan interest rate rises from 4.5% to 6.5%, then you can
see that interest rate now become more expensive and is no longer low
anymore. So for that matter, if you're to invest, it's quite difficult for you to get a
better return and in that case I would suggest that you were to use your money to
settle the loan instead. So, what is important when you apply this strategy
that I share with you is that you must make sure that when you don't settle or
use the cash to settle the loan, you must not spend the money away as
well. If you are determined to grow money with high certainty, I would
suggest that you must learn how to use loan as an leverage when the loan
interest rate is low. If you want me to answer your most burning question about
money, about investing, about wealth management, please drop me an email or WhatsApp
me your question. Now I have another question. This question is from Alif.
He is from Taman Tun. Now he said that, I realised I need to pay income tax for
investment property that generates rental. So would it be a better idea for me
to invest in unit trust instead? So what is the difference in term of benefits
when investing in these two investments. Now basically to me both investments
whether you invest into property or you invest into unit trust, it has got
pros and cons. Let me share you. For property investment the benefit is that
you can do leverage using a loan, you can generate rental income and you can
also enjoy capital appreciation but the downside of the property investment is
that it is not so liquid when you want sell it to turn into cash and normally
it's quite a big item. I mean you need to have a few hundred thousand at least
to invest into a property. And the fact that it is quite big piece, it is not
so easy for you to diversify. For unit trust investment, the benefit is
that you can invest in a smaller amount and it's more liquid and since that is
the case, it is easy and easier for you to do diversification as well. But the
downside of unit trust investing is that you can't really get loan to leverage in
your investing plus also you will require more knowledge and you also
require more discipline to make sure that you really make money in unit trust
investing. So basically as you can see, both investments units trust and property
investment have got its own advantages and also disadvantages.
I wouldn't say one investment is better than another investment. Therefore it is
very important to learn how to use strategic asset allocation to invest.
When you invest using strategic asset allocation, you are
investing in two different asset classes. By doing so you'll be able to use the
strength of one asset class to neutralise the weakness of another asset
class. When you are determined to grow your money with high certainty, you must learn
how to use strategic asset allocation to invest into multiple investment asset
classes so that your will be able to gain the benefits from different asset classes.
-------------------------------------------
Tamaki & Yoshino - Don't deserve you [MV] - Duration: 4:04.
You're the first face that I see
And the last thing I think about
You're the reason that I'm alive
You're what I can't live without
You're what I can't live without
You never give up
When I'm falling apart
Your arms are always open wide
And you're quick to forgive
When I make a mistake
You love me in the blink of an eye
I don't deserve your love
But you give it to me anyway
Can't get enough
You're everything I need
And when I walk away
You take off running and come right after me
It's what you do
And I don't deserve you
You're the light inside my eyes
You give me a reason to keep trying
You give me more than I could dream
And you bring me to my knees
You bring me to my knees
Your heart is gold and how am I the one
That you've chosen to love
I still can't believe that you're right next to me
After all what I've done
I don't deserve your love
But you give it to me anyway
Can't get enough
You're everything I need
And when I walk away
You take off running and come right after me
It's what you do
And I don't deserve you
I don't deserve a chance like this
I don't deserve a love that gives me everything
You're everything I want
I don't deserve your love
But you give it to me anyway
Can't get enough
You're everything I need
And when I walk away
You take off running and come right after me
It's what you do
And I don't deserve you
And I don't deserve you
-------------------------------------------
Don't Laze Me, Bro - Duration: 11:25.
-------------------------------------------
MÉLENCHON ON MACRON'S LABOR LAW: "DON'T COUNT US OUT JUST YET!" - Duration: 5:10.
Despite a flurry of truisms about the virtue of social dialogue,
and despite all the clichés that say social partners should love each other,
we will not lose sight of the heart of the matter.
From now on, if you succeed in passing your labor law,
the law is no longer the law as far as social affairs are concerned,
and it no longer prevails, since a simple company agreement,
or even an agreement within a branch of a company, can have the last word.
The principle of favorability—that was the heart of social law from the very beginning—is inverted.
Dear colleague, we are back in this era of the 19th century you were speaking of.
The battle for labor law started on March 14th 1896,
when the socialist deputy Arthur Groussier
—who was seating here, next to Jean Jaurès—
introduced for the first time a bill that proposed that social affairs be legislated.
He had patience, and we should emulate him in our battle against... them.
He had to wait until the month of May 1910 to witness the birth of labor law.
You are not undoing labor law out of social hate, I will not accuse you of that,
even though I did not forget your cheers when you heard Mrs Pénicaud's marvelous story
which combines employee stock options and redundancies.
And I did not forget this moment either, when an outburst of applause arose from your rows
as trade unions were being denigrated,
which we have always considered a most undoubtable political indication.
No, I will not. You sincerely believe that the less labor rights,
the more the market will—through the action of the invisible hand—
fairly reward society and increase production.
You're mistaking our century for another.
Only stability, previsibility and the securing of high-level professional qualifications
can guarantee economic development,
and more importantly the imperative mutation of our production apparatus.
For tomorrow, August 2nd, will be the day when our planet is in debt,
because our production model is destroying everything!
Therefore, we must change everything!
To do that, we must change production apparatuses and processes,
we must change and upgrade employees' qualifications,
in order to rise to the challenge of replacing everything that comes from fossil fuels
and everything that comes from these hazardous materials that destroy the planet.
This is the real challenge!
It's not about the level of profitability of shares,
or about the capacity of a few pervert, neurotic people
to ceaselessly accumulate a fortune whose ultimate objective remains unknown.
Yes, this is the reality!
We have the right to see the world differently,
and as far as I'm concerned, I see as far as individual behavior.
Here is the heart of the matter:
previsibility, stability, ecological planning, upgrading of professional qualifications.
This is what a modern economy and a modern industry look like,
from our perspective at least.
This is why we carefully chose our words, and we tried to demonstrate it during the whole debate:
what you just did, and what you're about to do, we call it a social coup d'état,
because you are inverting the hierarchy of social norms!
Under these circumstances,
in accordance with what we've always said, let us tell you this:
we will not budge an inch as long as the discussion and the balance of power are possible!
What cannot be settled amicably will be settled through the balance of power!
We won't give up on anything!
We encourage citizens to join the trade unions' demonstration of September 12th,
we urge citizens to demonstrate on September 23rd,
and we tell honnest people, those who have nothing but their work to make a living,
we tell them to defend themselves and to not remain passive!
Look at them! Their tongue is like whip when they talk!
[Inaudible]
No! What I'm advocating is called democracy!
President of the Assembly: Please conclude!
JLM: Yeah, yeah! It's simple: ballots papers and demonstrations!
Simple!
This was what I had to say.
I urge you to join all the battles that will arise from this struggle.
Don't count us out just yet, because your best days are behind you!
You will fall and we will not!
President of the Assembly: Thank you Mr Mélenchon.
-------------------------------------------
we don't talk anymore (Charlie Puth feat Selena Gomez) Piano and vocal cover - Duration: 2:00.
we don't talk anymore
we don't talk anymore
we don't talk anymore like we used to do
we don't love anymore
what was all of it for?
we don't love anymore like we used to do
I just heard you found the one you've been looking
You've been looking for
I wish i would've known it wasn't me
Don't wanna know kinda dress you're wearing tonight
If he's holding on to you so tight the way i did before
I overdose should've known your love was a game
now i can't get you out of my brain oh it's such a shame
We don't talk anymore, we don't talk anymore, we don't talk anymore like we used to do
-------------------------------------------
Skyrocketing gas prices don't deter drivers from filling up - Duration: 2:10.
-------------------------------------------
Undertale Don't go (vietsub CC) - Duration: 3:16.
-------------------------------------------
[Game] Don't Forget #1 - Duration: 12:45.
-------------------------------------------
Anti-Trump Republicans Believe The Same Things As Trump – Don't Be Fooled - Duration: 4:20.
There was a very interesting article recently on Huffington Post that said, "We shouldn't
be praising these Republicans who are coming out against Donald Trump, or positioning themselves
as the anti-Trump during campaign or whatever it is they're actually trying to do."
And I agree with that, absolutely 100%, but that particular article did not go far enough
to explain why we shouldn't treat these saints or excuse me, these sinners as if they're
saints.
Here is why.
There may be a few exceptions to this, but for the most part, there are no Republicans
in Washington DC or no Republicans serving in state legislators or as state governors,
who do not believe 99% of the same things that Donald Trump believes.
I don't care what the media tells you.
I don't care that the media's lyinizing these people.
Republicans believe in the same things as Donald Trump.
Tax cuts for the wealthy, cutting entitlement programs, like Social Security, cutting programs
to help pay teachers and fire departments, and police officers, after school programs.
Cutting back on Medicaid, Medicare, Food Stamps, unemployment insurance.
Giving tax cut to the wealthy, denying that climate change exists, or admitting it exists
but then choosing to do nothing.
Those are hallmarks of the Republican Party.
Donald Trump did not invent those.
He didn't come up with any of those ideas.
He doesn't even have any idea on how to make them even more harmful for the American public.
Those are Republican Party, Republican official ideas.
That's where they came from.
So when you see a story about John McCain, what a hero coming out not voting to strip
22 million of their health insurance, right?
No, because McCain has been right there with the entire Republican Party, pushing for tax
cuts on the wealthy, which would constantly push us into a recession, fighting to take
away the benefits of struggling families.
Fighting to send us into more wars, so more of our children, our grandchildren, or our
parents can go and die overseas in a needless war.
John McCain is not a hero in politics, and it's time stop treating him as such.
The same with John Kasich, the man who disenfranchised thousands of Ohio voters in presidential elections,
to help swing the elections.
Yeah, that guy who went after those racist policies to keep black people away from the
voting booth.
That's a not a Republican hero because he stands up to Donald Trump.
These people are standing up to Trump, because they see the damage he does to their party,
not because they disagree with his policies but because they don't want him to tank their
party for good, or they see this as an opportunity for them to emerge as a leader and take over.
They are not heroes.
They do not stand against anything Donald Trump stands for.
They want the same things.
Donald Trump wasn't even the first Republican to bring up a border wall in the 2016 election.
That's been a Republican talking point for decades, folks.
So don't think that Donald Trump is sitting in that oval office coming up with these ideas
on his own.
He's not smart enough to do that.
These are long standing Republican goals that have been around a lot longer than you or
I have, and they're gonna be around a lot longer than any of you or I will be.
These Republicans out there who are fighting against Donald Trump, allegedly, they believe
in the same things, except they're just wrapped up in a not so overtly racist package.
That's the only difference between people like John Kasich and people like Donald Trump.
They are not heroes.
Let's stop treating them as such.
-------------------------------------------
Don't be a T-shirt! - Duration: 0:06.
Don't be a T-Shirt. Buy a ask whole
Jaltoid.com/Shop
-------------------------------------------
Styx - Don't Let It End (Cameo Version) - Duration: 4:43.
-------------------------------------------
4 Moments WWE DON'T WANT You To See! - Duration: 7:21.
Did you know that for only 9.99 you can watch every WWE, WCW and ECW PPV ever?
There's also original content like Ride Along, Bring It To The Table and Table For
3.
Fans young and old have a seemingly endless park to play in, discover undiscovered gems
and relive classic moments.
But there are some moments from wrestling history that WWE don't want you to remember
or see.
Some shows are in fact edited versions of the live broadcast, removing things they want
you to forget.
I am Luke Owen and here are four things cut from the WWE Network.
Headline: An Empire State of Mind
Summerslam 2015 is notable for a few things, but particularly for it being the beginning
of The New Day's record breaking tag team title reign.
This was also the start of a new WWE tradition of holding Summerslam weekend in The Barclays
Centre in Brooklyn, New York.
To celebrate, the then heel New Day used this as a chance to garner some local heat - by
noting New York doesn't know anything about hip hop.
For those unaware (because, look at me, I am hip hop through and through), New York
actually does know a lot about hip hop.
They then sang a parody version of Jay Z's Empire State of Mind: Let's hear it for
New Daaaaay, etc etc, which transitioned into the New Day Rocks chant.
However if you go and check this out on the WWE Network, the song is edited out entirely
- despite being a parody and therefore rights free - and just cuts to the New Day Rocks
chant.
Perhaps this is WWE just playing it safe, not wanting Jay-Z on their back for making
fun of his song.
After all this isn't the only example of parody song being cut from the Network, with
the famous 'Wind Beneath My Ring' promo from Stephanie McMahon during the Invasion
angle also edited off Raw, as are most of The Rock's concerts.
It also means WCW's Kiss Demon debut isn't available on The Network because he made his
first appearance during KISS playing a live performance on Nitro.
Well, it's either that, or because The KISS Demon was a horrible gimmick.
Headline: The WrestleMania Lick
Mickie James being the psycho stalker of Trish Stratus was a fantastic angle leading into
WrestleMania 21, where Mickie would be challenging Stratus for the Women's Championship.
The story was basically Mickie Single White Femaling Trish, debuting as her biggest fan
before doing crazy things like dressing up as her for Halloween.
But when she revealed she liked Trish in more than just a 'you're a good wrestler'
kind of way, Trish didn't reciprocate.
This led to a fantastic heel turn for Mickie, and actually created a lot of buzz for their
Mania encounter.
While the match is notable for the crowd turning on the babyface Trish to cheer the heel Mickie,
it will be remembered for its botched finish and a moment that has since been edited off
the Network and all DVD releases.
Towards the end of the match there's a spot where Trish attempted the Stratusfaction and
Mickie countered the move by grabbing her vagina.
Mickie then turned to the crowd and… well… licked her hand.
"I came back through the curtain and Vince was really mad.
In the moment it had seemed amazing to me.
I thought 'Vince will love this'.
'Crass' was the word I got.
He didn't like it at all.
He told me, 'We're going to have to go back and edit that out.
Do you know how much time [this will take]?'
This was my first WrestleMania, my mom was in the audience, I'm freaking out already.
I'm back through the curtain and I'm already in tears and an emotional mess.
And I got yelled at."
- Mickie James, The Sun, October 2011
The spot was cut off the DVD release, which is the same edit that's used on the Network.
During the spot, the camera cuts to the crowd but you still hear the response.
La Femme Non-Committal
Vince McMahon loves celebrity endorsements, and he also loves working with TV stations
to help promote their shows.
In early 1997, USA Network's big show was touted to be La Femme Nikita, a spin-off programme
from the successful 1990 movie Nikita.
It had began airing in January, but in a mirror of Raw and Nitro was struggling in a ratings
war with TNT's Robin Hood.
In fact, it was the struggling ratings of La Femme Nikita that prompted the USA Network
to make Monday Night Raw two hours long - it had been just a one hour show up until that
point.
In an effort to help boost its ratings, USA Network sent the show's star Peta Wilson
to be interviewed on camera by WWF's lead commentator Vince McMahon.
Sadly, Wilson didn't look like she wanted to be there, and was then very dismissive
of McMahon's questions.
At one point in the very short interview, Vince asks her about the show's sexuality
- saying there's a fair amount of sex which the audience appreciates, Wilson replies:
"That's untrue, it's actually a proper, prim kind of show.
It's the kind of show you want to sit down and watch alone on a quiet evening".
A clip of La Femme Nikita was shown in the original broadcast - which could be why the
segment is missing from the Network version, with WWE having to secure the licence.
But given how the whole interview is edited out rather than just the clip, implies Vince's
embarrassment might be to blame.
Headline: Bash in the Face 1996
Is there a WCW PPV more famous than Bash at the Beach 1996?
It was the event where Hulk Hogan revealed himself as The Outsider's third man to form
the New World Order - a group that would change the fortunes of WCW and make them the largest
wrestling company in the world.
It's one of the most iconic moments in modern wrestling, but if you check it out on the
WWE Network, there is something missing.
After Randy Savage is carried out of the ring by Sting while Hogan and Hall celebrate, a
fan rushes into the ring to get to the Hulkster.
He gets quite far as well, sneaking under the bottom rope and standing up in the ring
against Kevin Nash.
Seeing this, Big Sexy knocks him down and starts kicking the hell out of him.
"I had to clip a guy.
Some fat drunk came in under the bottom rope.
Had to put him down.
Scott kicked him in the head."
- Kevin Nash, "Monday Night War", August 26th 2014
In the WWE Network version of Bash at the Beach '96, Savage is taken out of the ring
and then it cuts to a shot with security dealing with the fan outside the ring.
Oddly though, on the WWE Network show Monday Night War, the clip is there in full complete
with the commentary track.
This is because the WWE Network version of Bash at the Beach 1996 is actually the home
video release rather than the PPV broadcast - which is commonplace across the the streaming
service - to remove moments like this that could encourage other fans to jump the rail
and get into the ring.
Remember Mick Foley?
Remember his botched retirement?
And what are some of the craziest Vince McMahon conspiracies?
Click the videos to the left to find out more.
Press subscribe and support WrestleTalk on Patreon.
I have been Luke Owen, and that was a list.
-------------------------------------------
DON'T Buy A GLITTER iPhone Case (BURN WARNING) - Duration: 7:29.
I think it's leaking I think the burning case is leaking. You guys did it
We crushed it basically if you don't know what I'm talking about
I made this five weird gadgets at 5 and below video and one of the products in there was this liquid glitter iphone case
So I said in that video if we hit the like goal, which you guys absolutely crushed
I would crack open some of these liquid glitter iphone cases. So you're saying to yourself Keaton
Why are these liquid glitter iphone cases such a big deal? Let me explain a little further
Basically what went down is a few weeks ago some people started saying they were getting burned by their liquid glitter
iPhone cases, and I thought to myself how? Like how is this possible, you're probably saying the exact same thing
What happened was the liquid inside these cases
Apparently isn't water and it's causing chemical burns people. 24 people said they got burned and over quarter million
That's two hundred and fifty thousand cases got recalled
They're made by this company called mix bin and fortunately enough, well kind of unfortunately if you got burned
Fortunately enough if you did pick up one of these cases which went from anywhere between
Twenty to sixty five dollars and were sold at some of your favorite stores like Victoria's secret and Nordstrom's you can get a full refund
So that's good
But I still am curious why do these liquid glitter cases burn people? Chemical burns like you think it'd be water
So I picked up all of the cases at least the main ones that I could find and
We're gonna crack these open and see if the liquid in here actually burns, and real quick
I threw some gloves on some tough medical gloves
I don't know if one of the cases has started to leak, I've been cleaning it up for real here
And I don't want to take any chances if this actually does burn so the first test that I'm gonna use is a litmus test
Science Keaton is here and basically what a litmus test is gonna'
Tell us is if the liquid inside is acidic or basic, okay hold with me
It's not that difficult. You guys can see we got our litmus test here
And how this works is when I pierce the case and get the liquid out, I'm gonna do it in a second
I'm gonna stick one of these strips in and pretty quickly if it turns one of these colours or just remains the same colour
We're gonna know what PH it is, most of the time this works
I don't actually know what's inside here and could just dissolve into the paper
That's also a possibility and whatever colour it turns that'll tell us if it's basic or acidic, the lower the number the more acidic
That's what I'm personally thinking, but we're about to find this out. I'm a little scared, I'm not gonna' lie
I'm gonna' hop on into this case the safest way I know how with a nail and a hammer, and just side note
I don't think we're gonna crack open the liquid glitter iphone case
That one probably doesn't burn these are the ones we care about. So, got it in a pyrex dish, please be, oh wait I need a mask
I almost forgot. Safety is number one priority
I'm just going through like a checklist in my head of is this a good idea? No. How do we make this a better idea
Glasses, check, safety's number one priority. Gloves, Rick and Morty's smock, is that a smock? No, lab coat. Then a mask and then we're good
Fogging up my glasses, whoa. We're feeling safe now, here we go
[Hammer noises]
I might break the glass before I break the case. These cases are pretty tough, a lot tougher than I thought
[Hammer noises]
I feel like it's just a pen. Just feels like a pen is poking
I'm trying to screw now. I don't know I'm sciency', I'm not that sciency
[Hammer noises]
We got liquid
Whoo!
Finally! Yo that took way too long! You guys can see we got some liquid just drop by drop by drop
We're filling it up to the top. Oh great, it went all over my clothes
This was fun, this was a great fun video. I hope it doesn't start burning
I should have put the lab coat on way before. Whoa that just like seeped into the desk. Actually happy
I have a mask on. Alright, that should be plenty of liquid you can see yes
It's coming out there. Now that we got a little bit of liquid from the case right at the bottom
I'm gonna try the litmus test out. You got a strip here, and these are the colours that we're looking for
So...
Let's see if we get something
[Noises]
Come on case, stay out of here
It's
Pretty much, not turning any colour
I want to say that it's
Just, six it looks like it's six on here, but I feel like it's just being absorbed into the paper
So I got another test. It involves a pork shoulder
Yeah, that's a pork shoulder alright. Basically, I'm gonna stick the fat side in, you guys can see it
I'm gonna get rid of this case as well
Whoo!
That is, my hands they've they're feeling on fire, I feel like the hulk right now
[Hulk screams]
I'm gonna stick the pork shoulder in fat side down, and we're gonna see if any stored
Sort of bubbling or burning goes on. I know it's not a complete science
I'm not gonna use anything living that would be way not cool, so let's grab this knife
Cut open this pork shoulder, yummy yummy
Someone would have enjoyed this I know that. Fat side down, let's see if any bubbles start happening, listen
I don't think we're hearing anything, I'm gonna push it in a little more
See if anything starts happening, I feel like it's just being soaked in and absorbed. While it's soaking it up at the bottom
I'm just gonna start marinating it with the other cases
[Noises]
That step plastic is pretty tough, how did these even crack open in the first place?
Someone's dropping their phone a lot, I guess that's it. I just punctured this one, we're gonna' start marinating it
Oh yeah, you can definitely see juices going out
No burns, nothing?
Wow, that just looks like a really bad marinade. Is it changing it colour at all?
Oh, alright, we got more on me. Yes, that's my favourite! No, I don't see any colour changes
Maybe a little bit
Alright, I'm gonna' flip the bottom side over see if there's any damage
Damn, that's a nice pork shoulder. Did it soak all of it up? Probably
Alright
Crikey's, that is a big shoulder
Whoo!
It pretty much just soaked up all of the liquid glitter. It's looking real shiny
But, no burns
Well that was kind of disappointing. If you guys have any other ideas
Let me know in the comments below and if there's any other really good ideas
I'll retry this some way somehow and just post a clip. I really want this to actually burn or do something
This is just
How? Shout out time!
I want to give a huge shoutout to Jad and Disc-Man for having my
Notifications on for this video. If you guys want one turn them on and let me know in the comments
I upload a brand new video every Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Saturday at 3 p.m.
PST. Subscribe if you're new so you guys don't miss it and tweet me at techsmartt if you guys find any other
Dangerous iphone cases, I'll see you later, bye!
Whoa that went through. I'm at the grove right now doing some shopping with my sister and what'd you say?
Shut up
If she doesn't see a youtuber here, she's gonna lose it. Alright, we're gonna' see
-------------------------------------------
WE DON'T LIKE MALEC - LGBT REPRESENTATION IN SHADOWHUNTERS Canal Pandemonium - Duration: 21:14.
Finally, here's the video that we know, we will get a lot of hate because we know this fandom loves Malec, right?
We love Malec. - We also love Malec.
Me too. When it's written in pages in that thing called book.
With context.
But it's about time we talk about why we don't like Malec on the tv show.
That's why we owe you guys an explanation, because we know how much you like them.
Exactly.
We're not just being haters like most of you are saying. - We're not.
Maybe a little. - No.
No, we're not being haters. - We're haters about other things.
We're haters about many other things.
And right now, that's not the case.
Can I start? - Yes.
Okay, I will start by talking about Magnus because he's my favorite character,
so I do pay attention to him a lot.
And this is something that I complain about all the time.
Like I said on our last review, Magnus doesn't have any resourcefulness.
And he's too serious. Too willing to help.
He's like, the shadowhunters' slave. And that annoys me.
That's something we were talking about, he doens't have his own character development.
Yeah. - He only develops when there's Alec.
He's that character that's attached to others.
Maia has more development than Magnus. - Exactly.
And that's the first step for you to get attached to a couple.
You need to get attached to them as individuals.
Not only as a couple.
Because when they like each other, and they're together, you're like:
"Wow, two people with amazing personalities together. I want this."
Yeah, that's something you want to ship. You want them together.
It's the same thing in real life.
Couples only exist from the sum of two individuals.
If that couple exists, why do they exist?
The point is, Magnus only exists when there's Malec.
Magnus doesn't exist in his apartment, with his
own problems or having his own personality.
He only exists when shadowhunters needs him,
when Alec is needy or Alec needs something. - Or when he's drinking with Dot.
Or when he's acting like a bohemian.
And we only have a few glimpses of him with Catarina and sometimes with Dot.
Something to show that he has a life outside of that. - Like a background.
Malec is working more towards Alec as an individual.
Even when they showed Magnus' past, it was still a Malec moment.
Magnus is really Alec's little bitch.
It's not something you ship it.
Now, I have a complaint about Alec.
Lots of people are gonna think that this is absurd.
I've seen people saying that because there were some complaints about
Alec not having the struggle he had with his own sexuality like he did in the books.
It was easier for him to accept it.
So that mischaracterized his character from the books, a little bit.
Some people were complaining about that.
I agree. - It's valid.
It's 2017, people don't need to make a big deal ou of it.
I have nothing against couples that meet each other
and everything is amazing. In fact that's how it is in real life.
But I think that for them to have a good development,
something that makes you want to seem them getting together,
they need to have some kind of trouble on one side or the other.
And everything could go wrong.
There were nothing on Alec's side. He just looked at Magnus and was like,
"Oh I'm gay, I like him and that's it. Let's be together."
That was it, there were nothing more. - "Here at my wedding, in front of everyone."
With him being a shadowhunter, Magnus being a downworlder,
and with Alec coming from a very conservative family,
everything could go wrong. - But it didn't.
- That's where I, the person that you hate, come in.
Because we always do this. So yes, I will compared it to the books.
Just so you know, book Alec only kissed Magnus
for the first time in front of other people, on the 3rd book.
In the middle of a war. - It took 3 books.
At the end of the war, actually. He was like,
"Holy shit, I went through hell and back, [little does he know]
so I will allow myself this luxury." - Yeah.
"I will give myself to my own happiness and I won't care about anyone else."
"Because I don't know if I will survive."
That was a part of the struggle that he
mention it, that Alec didn't have on the show.
In the show the characters are older and the show is a different world.
But he should've had another personality because...
He figure it out everything overnight. He figured it out that he was gay,
he was engaged to a woman he didn't know,
the guy he flirted with, a little bit, stopped his wedding
and then he gave himself to love in front of everyone.
There was a huge fast forward there.
It's important for every tv show to have this kind of development.
Something cool that we had on the books, it's that
you read the books and you know they're together but
Alec kept it a secret. - Even from the people who were close to him.
He was embarassed when Jace and Clary talked about Magnus in front of him.
The best scene ever from city of ashes is when
everyone is at Luke's house and Alec shows up with a hickey
and then he tells them that he fell on his neck, on the stairs.
But actually, it was Magnus.
[nothing important or related to the show or books]
That's when he had the fearless rune, right? - Yeah, and he almost tells his family
because of that rune.
Oh, this scene is cool, it shoud've been on the show.
This will probably make things worse but I think people are mixing things up.
I'm not talking about every fan but fans in general,
they still don't know the difference between a character and an actor.
The actors are a good match? You may think so,
I think they're good individually, as Magnus and as Alec.
But together, they have no chemistry. - Yeah, they don't.
That's my opinion. If you watch the show and you enjoy it, you think
it's beautiful and you ship show Magnus with show Alec, congrats.
I think they only look at each other, exchange some simple lines,
give each other a peck on the lips and then the plot is over.
Yeah, we're telling you guys our reasons... - So, yeah, I am a show Magnus hater. Yes I am.
Back to the subject, it's lacking development.
They got together and that's it. They're together.
[not important or related, again]
And it's not only lacking development on their story as a couple.
But on the scenes as well.
He goes to Magnus, and says: "Oh, this happened, I'm sorry." and then kisses him.
"I'm sorry, kisses him, says I love you and cut."
Yeah. It's like Artur said on the last review,
that last scene had the best development of them.
Because they argued, and talked... - And there were more than one line.
Fights don't usually end with one line, a kiss and that's it.
And if it does, I'm sorry, but I think your relationship sucks.
That's my opinion, so don't hate on Pandemonium, hate on me.
I think that if it were a soap opera or another show you wouldn't like those characters.
We end up liking their interaction because we like those characters.
Not the story they're telling us.
Now I wanna add more topics that... - We're adding more fuel to the fire!
That's not within the scope of actors or characters.
Bad script? - No, that's not it.
Putting the script and the lack of interaction aside,
there's something that often happens on tv shows,
and that is, putting a lgbt couple just for people to ship it.
Just so people can enjoy the show.
The famous: - Token.
Token.
I mean, it's not exactly queerbaiting because queerbait is
when it's implied that there's something more when it doesn't.
In shadowhunters it does. - But we can't understand.
[it was a joke that only works in portuguese]
And it's sad, it's really sad. Because we're living in
a time where we should have more representation.
And good representation on tv shows.
Any show can make any mistake about representation
or put any lgbt character that people would still like it.
Just because they're lgbt. That's it. That makes me so mad.
We need something that really represents us.
Not just something that they want to sell it
just because there's a lgbt couple.
It's like, lgbt people exist just to be lgbt.
I don't think it should be a couple for representation.
It should be a couple because it exists. - Because it exists, yeah.
Because it's something real and not because
"Oh my God, we need a lgbt couple."
No. Everyone knows a lgbt couple. Because it's normal.
And if you don't think it's normal, that's another issue.
Then you have no reason to watch this channel.
Unsubscribe, we won't miss you.
The point is, it's not because we need to have representation,
It's because it's normal.
It's like dealing with people who breathes oxygen. Everyone does.
Not that everyone is gay but gay people exist.
And that's why we really like... Again, going into the book subject...
People keep calling Cassandra names, saying that she's homophobic.
- It doesn't make sense. - Things that doesn't make any sense.
Because she knows how to develop lgbt couples. - There's gay, lesbian, trans...
If you're familiar with the art of reading, I mean, if you're literate,
you would know that in one of the last books they introduced a transsexual character.
Because it's not about representation, it's because it exists.
Therefore, I will represent the reality.
It ends up being a representation anyway. But it's not a token.
Going back to what Artur said, before they create a show, they're like,
"Guys, we need a lgbt couple because every show have a lgbt couple."
They're adapting a book and on the books,
it took them 3 books to get together.
So why they got together on the 8th episode?
Because they need to have a lgbt couple. That's it.
"It's not developed? Screw it. There's no chemistry? Screw that too.
We need to have it and we will put it. It's done."
It's like Clary and Jace, they fought, they stumbled and they're still not together.
There's a lot of development. - That's how it should be.
They should stumble, leave, stay, kiss etc. They would still be together but...
People would like it better, I would like it better if it was like:
"Oh they're going to kiss..." and then they don't and they both go to opposite sides.
And we're like: "Kiss each other, goddamnit" - Yeah, have doubts, leave...
We don't want them to just kiss.
We want scenes to be natural.
Not to mention that there's plenty of other cases,
it's also a matter of script, if it's allowed or if the channel allows it, I mean...
If it's a channel that allows these things
because some channels doesn't accept it.
So I won't go on right now into this matter
of what is and what's not allowed...
But treat it with naturality and...
- It's not natural. - It doesn't feel natural.
If you think it feels natural we understand but our opinion is different.
The point is, you need to force yourself to be impartial.
Really think it through, take a look at the context of the development
and everything that happens with Malec on the show.
And put that on a straight couple. Would you ship it?
No, because it would seem robotic. Like they were forced to be together
without knowing each other. They flirted like two times
and then Magnus were already crashing his wedding.
This is not real, it's not human. - And their fights...
Malec was... - Malec, they're one character.
Malec was... pissed off for god knows how many episodes until
the end of the season because Alec didn't tell him about the sword.
If they had any real chemistry, they wouldn't need to have that fight.
Malec... Magnus would look at Alec and he would be like,
"Okay, I understand, you know? These are big issues."
They're one character.
Magnus would see and realize that it's about bigger issues,
he didn't kept the secret because he was being selfish.
Magnus is really old, you think he wouldn't understand?
- "It has nothing to do with me."
He wasn't hiding it because he wanted the downworld
to get destroyed. He wanted to protect them, actually.
He didn't want to cause trouble. - We always base our opinions,
partially, mostly me, on things we saw on the
books. But we know that's two different types of media.
And we know the idea is different, but the problem is, within
that idea that the show tries to deliver to us, is still flawed.
It's not about the difference between the tv show and the books.
No. - Okay, we know is different. But within this here, is still wrong.
My memory sucks, I almost don't remember things
that happened in the books, especially with Malec,
so impartially speaking, on the show, it's bad.
Honestly, we're not being haters. - It's our opinion.
We accept the fact that some people are passionate about them.
That live because of it.
I wanna talk about that now. I don't like soccer.
But the reason why I don't like it is the fans not the sport itself.
[ not important ]
Malec fans, let's get into this topic. They're not impartial.
They like the fact that there's a f... Sorry, that there's a lgbt couple on the show.
And they're like, "Oh that's good. That's beautiful,
they're the best couple ever and the best kiss of the year." Guys, no.
And we can't say shit about it. - Instead of following them blindly,
reach out to the writers, ask them to put more thought into the couple.
Make them more realistic. - Don't let them be just the "lgbt couple."
It's because you like them that you should reach out to them.
You're not an activist if you support Malec but
don't support other types of couples on the show.
Because there's no lesbian couple. There's no other sexuality. - Bisexuality.
We have Magnus but he's with Alec, he's in a homosexual relationship.
So, if you support a gay relationship but doesn't
give a damn about lesbian representation or bisexual representation etc
You're not doing anything, you're being a fetishist. - Exactly.
Let's not be fetishists. If you want to pretend to be an activist, do it right.
This is like, the only thing we're asking.
And it's okay if you like them, that's great, just try to understand that there's
issues, so don't be a pain in the ass when people are saying bad things about them,
just because you think your couple is sacred and no one can touch it... Guys, please.
Some people don't want to see it. People are talking
about it and instead of trying to see what's wrong
or what they're doing, no, they point fingers.
"You're homophobic." I'm sorry but I think it's impossible for me to be homophobic.
Even Cassie, the writer of a book... - That has tons of representation.
that in 2007... - It was 10 years ago!
In 2007, there were no books with lgbt characters
that had that power of telling people about their life.
It's true. - And Alec does that.
Alec had that struggle.
[ talking about harry potter ]
The author of a book that in 2007 had decided to put a gay character
as a main, dealing with his sexuality and having relationships...
And being a normal person at the same time. - Is accused of homophobia, biphobia...
- No. No. By people who thinks that she can't criticize because she's straight.
There were moments when the fans were bothering me but
then it crossed a line when I saw people calling her names.
The author who created these characters.
This couple only exists because the author wrote it. And she did a very good job.
A topic for another video is the difference between
the brazilian fandom and the international fandom.
Show fandom and book fandom.
Which is absurd.
Like I was saying, it's about impartiality.
We as Cassandra fans, we read, we go after it
so we can know what's happening and why people
are saying these things about her.
We want to know, we want to understand.
But there's no explanation. - There's no arguments to defend their accusation.
They just keep saying she's homophobic.
[ off topic and not important ]
[ just talking about how Cassandra is always releasing books and tales on tumblr ]
If you're one of those people who believes that Cassie is any type of "phobic."
Try to explain it to us. Honestly, we really want to understand. - And don't be rude.
And don't call us homophobic because there's no way. - We like to read arguments.
If you didn't like anything we said about show Malec...
- The "don't subscribe" button is right there.
[ not important, talking about subscribers ]
I mean, we didn't attacked anyone, we didn't attacked anything.
Stop apologizing, f*ck them.
We gave you arguments, so please give us arguments as well.
Keep in mind that this is our opinion. We're not asking you to agree with it.
It's our opinion, from our research and experience.
Some people say things like:
Oh, I don't like your opinion so I'll destroy your channel."
No, If you don't like our opinion, we're inviting you to make your own channel...
With a different opinion. - You can even send it to us, we'll promote it.
Let's invite someone who's a super [show] Malec shipper?
to come here and have a discussion with us live? - Let's do it.
Make a video with lots of arguments and
we will post your version on our channel.
We're asking for a video response. - Or just a comment below.
We will post it.
We like different opinions. - I'm gonna be like,
"But first, name, age and sexuality?"
[ not important]
That's it, guys. We really wanna know your opinion.
Whether you agree or not, tell us why.
[ not really important ]
-------------------------------------------
#14 Part 1 - Don't get too excited by the bank's unusually high FD interest rate - Duration: 3:40.
Welcome to Yap's Money life show. Thank you for your support and your interest.
Today I would like to talk about the unknown truth about bank's super high fixed deposit
interest rate. Now you see a client told me recently that 2 years
ago, his bank offered him a very high and attractive FD interest rate at 10%
on the condition that he also at the same time invest some of the money
into unit trust. So he thought this is a good deal. As long as he can get a high
10% fixed deposit interest rate, he would do anything. So what happened is that he
told me he took RM100,000 out from his fixed deposit then the
bank put RM25,000 of the RM100,000 into fixed deposit and
give him 10.5% interest per annum. And the balance RM75,000 of
the money is put into 1 equity fund with 5%
sales charge. What my client didn't know is that the bank actually takes half of the
5% sales charge that he paid to the bank and put this 2.5%
into his fixed deposit. That's how he is getting a high 10.5%
interest rate from his fixed deposit. So you see normally when you go for
the fixed deposit, you will be getting about 3% interest rate per
year. So the additional 7.5% that he is getting now is
actually coming from his own pocket. What is worse for my client is that he
doesn't even know much about this particular
equity fund that he invested into. He doesn't know how to manage this unit
trust fund. Whether it goes up, comes down, he didn't know what to do. At the end of one year,
the fund, the investment which is RM75,000 ended up to become
RM60,000. So, he didn't know what to do. That's why he just sold it at
loss. We can see here for the extra gain of 7.5% of FD
which is RM1,875 he ends up losing RM15,000
from his unit trust investment. So my suggestion to fellow viewers is that
when you are determined to grow your money with high certainty, always be
careful of unusual benefit being offered to you because there may be some hidden
risk, hidden disadvantages that you may
not be aware. So think twice, think 3 times before you invest into anything
that offers you super high interest, super high return.
-------------------------------------------
If the Whispers don't kill you, the Shadows will. - Duration: 0:34.
It's a race for the cure . . .
Can sixteen-year-old West save everyone he loves from a madness-inducing phenomenon . . .
Before it's too late?
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét