Thứ Sáu, 1 tháng 2, 2019

Youtube daily which Feb 1 2019

(upbeat ragtime jazz music)

- Christie Craig's Divorced, Desperate and Delicious.

It's wonderful.

It'll make you laugh.

Make you cry

and make you just happy.

- I love Jill Shalvis' Animal Magnetism series.

They take place in a veterinary hospital

so I'd love to see those.

- Dark Light by Jayne Ann Krentz.

I think that would make a great movie.

I think the visuals in it would be interesting.

- Wolf and the Dove by Katherine Woodiwiss.

- Do You Wanna Start a Scandal by Tessa Dare.

That would be hilarious in a movie.

- Beautiful Disaster by Jamie McGuire.

Also her Providence series is very good.

I could see either one of those making a really,

a good movie.

- Oh my gosh.

So Courtney Milan has this series called the Cyclone series

and it's all about...

It's a contemporary romance, but it's set in like this ahh,

Apple-esque kind of tech world and it's very cool.

Very cinematic I think.

- I think almost anything by Georgette Heyer

would film extremely well.

My personal favorite and the one that I would love to see

is The Unknown Ajax because the final scene

is just such a hoot where all the characters

come together and insanity ensues.

- A great movie would be Bad Boyfriend by K.A. Mitchell.

It's set in Baltimore and Eli Wright

is my all time favorite book boyfriend

and I would just love to see him played by Ezra Miller.

Yes.

Let's do that.

(laughing)

(upbeat ragtime jazz music)

For more infomation >> Which Romance Books Would Make a Great Movie? - Duration: 1:50.

-------------------------------------------

BCAAs or Protein? [Which Should YOU Take?] - Duration: 4:46.

Hey guys, Paul from Ultimate fat Burner.com here.

Today we're asking "bcaas or protein powder" Which should you take?

Is one better than the other?

Should you take them both?

I'll get into the details in just a few seconds, stick around... please don't

go anywhere.

Hey, welcome back and thanks so much for sticking around.

So let's get into the discussion on bcaas or protein powder and start with a little

background information.

BCAAs stands for branched chain amino acids, of which there are 3; leucine, isoleucine

and valine.

We care about branched chain aminos because they have a pronounced effect

on things related to muscle - especially Leucine, since its effects on muscle protein synthesis

is well documented.

Branched amino acids are also essential amino acids, which means they are aminos your body

can't make naturally - and have to be obtained from your diet.

Now Protein powders, of course, are a little different - they're not a source of just a

handful of aminmo acids, but of a much more robust blend of them.

The exact amino acid profile of the protein will depend

on its source - whether it's whey, egg, soy, caseine, rice, buckwheat or pea protein.

Whey protein is the most popular protein powder on the market, so I'm going to use it as my

example.

A good quality whey protein contains about 26 grams of BCAAs for every 100 grams of protein

and is a good source of all 9 essential amino acids.

It's amino acid profile is comprised of about 13% leucine.

If you remember, Leucine is that amino acid that plays such a critical role in muscle

protein synthesis.

So to put that into context, if you're taking 2 scoops of a high quality whey protein powder

daily, you're already consuming roughly 13 grams of BCAAs.

That's 2.5 times as many BCAAs as you'll receive from a single scoop of a standard BCAA product.

Now obviously some contain more and some contain less, but the

standard dose is about 5 grams.

Even better, whey protein delivers close to the ideal ratio of branched chain amino acids

- and that's 2:1:1.

In other words, typical BCAA product contains one part valine, one part isoleucine and 2

parts of leucine.

A 5 gram serving will look like this...

2,500 mg leucine / serving 1,250 mg isoleucine / serving

1,250 mg valine / serving.

Now Whey protein is a little low on the valine, but it's in the ball park.

Ok, by now I'm sure you see where I'm going here.

If you're already taking a couple of scoops of a high quality protein powder per day,

you're already taking plenty of BCAAS, and the benefits you can expect by taking

a BCAA supplement as well is going to diminish significantly.

A recent study for example - and I'll include a link to it below - showed that while BCAAs

helped athletes recover faster, it is likely that benefit is

negligible if you're already consuming adequate protein daily.

Ok, But what if you're not consuming adequate protein daily and you have to pick one.

Which should you choose - protein powder or BCAAs?

To me the answer is pretty clear; you should take a protein powder, and preferrably a whey

protein powder.

Not only will a single serving give you most of the aminos you'll get in a standard commercial

BCAA product, but you'll get all the other essential amino acids,

the non essential amino acids, and all the benefits associated with whey protein supplementation.

Now, don't me wrong; I'm not suggesting BCAAs don't offer value, they do.

And in my opinion, they do even if you ARE taking a quality protein supplement.

For example, I always have whey protein and BCAAs

in my cupboard.

Sometimes I throw a scoop of BCAAs into my water bottle so I can take them throughout

my workout.

I wouldn't do that with a whey protein.

So yes, I do like BCAAs.

But the questions was, BCAAs or Protein Powder.

And if it has to be one or the other, it should be protein powder.

Alright guys that's it for this video; if you have any questions or would like to share

your own experiences please leave a comment below.

If you liked this video a thumbs up or a share would be very

much appreciated.

If you hated this video, by all means thumb it down - I want to know what you think, good

or bad!

Before I sign off I got to ask if you're subscribed... be awesome if you were part of this growing

community.

Just click the subscribe button.

Thanks so much for watching and I'll see you really soon.

For more infomation >> BCAAs or Protein? [Which Should YOU Take?] - Duration: 4:46.

-------------------------------------------

Bernese Mountain Dog Vs Saint Bernard Dog vs Dog Which is Better? - Duration: 9:25.

At first glance, the Bernese Mountain Dog and Saint Bernard may bear a resemblance to

one another, but there are some striking differences between these two large, full-furred dogs.

Let's have a look at these two dogs closely and see where the differences lie, which makes

the better pet, and which is the right breed to add to your family.

You're watching Animal Facts.

History

The Bernese Mountain Dog originated in the farmlands around the city of Bern in Switzerland

as all-purpose farm dogs.

Their main purpose was to be companion dogs and to provide protection to the farmer and

his family, although they were also used to help drive cattle long distances to pasture

and as drafting dogs, pulling heavy carts.

The Berner's pulling weight capacity is estimated at between 1,000 and 2,200 pounds.

We don't have a date as to when the breed came into existence, but the Bernese Mountain

Dog has roots in the Roman Molossian hound breeds of ancient southern Europe.

The St. Bernard, also called the Alpine Mountain Dog, is also of the Roman Mollosser-type breeds.

The St. Bernard is the large general farm dog of the farmers and dairymen of the French

Alps, livestock guardians, herding dogs, and draft dogs as well as hunting dogs, search

and rescue dogs, and watchdogs.

The name "St. Bernard" originates from the Great St. Bernard Hospice, a traveler's hospice

on the often treacherous Great St. Bernard Pass in the Western Alps, between Switzerland

and Italy.

The pass, the lodge, and the dogs are named for Bernard of Menthon, the 11th-century Italian

monk who established the station and later canonized.

There the Saints were primarily used for search and rescue of people lost in the treacherous

pass.

It is said that the St. Bernard can locate a person buried under 20 feet of snow.

Appearance

Both being of the Molloser type are large dogs.

But, the St. Bernard is a bit larger than the Berner.

St. Bernards stand anywhere between 26 and 30 inches at the shoulder, depending on gender.

They can weigh up to 260 pounds.

The Bernese Mountain Dog stands 23 to 27.5 inches at the shoulder also depending on gender

and can weigh up to 120 pounds.

The St. Bernard's coat can be either smooth or rough; the smooth coat being close and

flat while the rough is dense, flat, and more profuse around the neck and legs.

The color is typically a red shade with white or a mahogany brindle with white.

Black shading is usually found on the face and ears.

The tail is long and heavy, hanging low.

Eyes are usually brown, but sometimes can be icy blue, and should have naturally tight

lids, with haws only slightly visible.

The Bernese Mountain Dog is a heavy dog with a distinctive tri-colored coat, black with

white chest and rust colored markings above eyes, sides of the mouth, the front of the

legs, and a small amount around the white chest.

Personality

Known as a classic example of a Gentle Giant, the St. Bernard is calm, patient and sweet

with adults, and especially children.

The biggest threat to small children is being knocked over by this breed's larger size.

Overall they are a sweet, gentle, calm, loyal and affectionate breed, and if socialized

are very friendly.

While generally not instinctively protective, a St. Bernard may bark at strangers, and their

size makes them good deterrents against possible intruders.

Saints can also get along well with other pets, especially if they're introduced to

them in puppyhood.

Supervise them around smaller dogs and cats just to make sure they don't accidentally

step or lie on them.

The breed standard for the Bernese Mountain Dog states that dogs should not be "aggressive,

anxious or distinctly shy", but rather should be "good-natured", "self-assured", "placid

towards strangers", and "docile".

Bernese mountain dogs are a breed that generally does well with children, as they are very

affectionate.

They are patient dogs that take well to children climbing over them.

Though they have great energy, a Bernese will also be happy with a calm evening.

Bernese work well with other pets and around strangers.

They are excellent guardians.

They tend to bond with one owner, and are somewhat aloof and standoffish.

Trainability

Saint Bernards can be difficult to train, especially for novice dog owners.

They are willful, stubborn and independent animals who sometimes listen and other times

do not.

They test boundaries and like to see what they can get away with and have little regard

for the rules you put in place.

Because of its large adult size, it is essential that proper training and socialization begin

while the St. Bernard is still a puppy, so as to avoid the difficulties that normally

accompany training large dogs.

An unruly St. Bernard may present problems for even a strong adult, so control needs

to be asserted from the beginning of the dog's training.

A confident, consistent, but gentle hand is needed with the Bernese Mountain Dog breed.

They can be stubborn and slow to learn, so patience and an even keel are important for

anyone training a Bernese Mountain Dog.

Despite their initial stubbornness, they do well in basic obedience training and can be

graduated to advanced tricks and agility.

Energy and Exercise

The St. Bernard does not need a lot of exercise.

It's not a jogging companion and will wilt in hot climates.

Saints suffer from heat exhaustion quite easily and need access to shade and plenty of fresh,

cool water during hot weather.

On the other hand, you'll never find a happier Saint Bernard than one who's enjoying a good

romp in the snow.

Bernese are outdoor dogs at heart, though well-behaved in the house; they need activity

and exercise, but do not have a great deal of endurance.

They can move with amazing bursts of speed for their size when motivated.

They enjoy hiking and generally stick close to their people.

Not being given the adequate amount of exercise may lead to barking and harassing in the Bernese.

Health and Lifespan

As large breeds, both dogs share a similarly short lifespan at about 7-9 years with some

dogs living to as old as 10 and rarely living to 12.

The very fast growth rate and the weight of a St. Bernard can lead to very serious deterioration

of the bones if the dog does not get proper food and exercise.

Many dogs are genetically affected by hip dysplasia or elbow dysplasia.

Osteosarcoma (bone cancer) has been shown to be hereditary in the breed.

They are susceptible to eye disorders called entropion and ectropion, in which the eyelid

turns in or out.

The breed is also susceptible to epilepsy and seizures, a heart disease called dilated

cardiomyopathy, and eczema.

Cancer is the leading cause of death for dogs in general, but Bernese Mountain Dogs have

a much higher rate of fatal cancer than other breeds; in both U.S./Canada and UK surveys,

nearly half of Bernese Mountain Dogs die of cancer, compared to about 27% of all other

dogs.

Inherited medical problems that a Bernese Mountain Dog may face include malignant histiocytosis,

progressive retinal atrophy, and possibly cataracts and other eye problems.

Bernese Mountain Dogs also have unusually high mortality due to musculoskeletal causes

like Arthritis, hip dysplasia, and cruciate ligament rupture.

Prospective Bernese Mountain Dog owners should be prepared to cope with a large dog that

may have mobility problems at a young age.

Conclusion

In conclusion, these are both large, loving and loyal dogs.

And both have their caveats.

Short life spans and health concerns plague both breeds and owners should expect that

with either comes hefty vet bills.

Oh, we should probably mention that both breeds are heavy droolers due to loose mouth skin

and large jowls.

Neither is particularly easy to train, but once trained make excellent family companions

and protectors.

So, which breed do you think wins?

Which would you have in your home?

Let us know in the comments below.

Any other breeds that you'd like me to compare?

Shout them out.

Hey, thanks for hanging with us.

If you want more dog vs. dog videos, you can check out more here.

If you liked this one, go ahead and smash that like button.

If you're a subscriber, thank you.

If not, what are you waiting for?

If you'd like to help me make more videos like this one, there are plenty of ways listed

in the description.

And as always, catch ya next time.

For more infomation >> Bernese Mountain Dog Vs Saint Bernard Dog vs Dog Which is Better? - Duration: 9:25.

-------------------------------------------

Which Are Healthier For You? Almonds or Walnuts? Dr Greger - Duration: 3:27.

Nuts are a superfood and powerhouses of nutrition but which are better almonds or walnuts. Well

as you can see almonds have slightly more protein, magnesium and phosphorus. Almonds

are an amazing source of vitamin E whereas walnuts are quite low. Then walnuts have slightly

more manganese and copper than almonds. The most notable difference between almonds and

walnuts are the amount of omega 6 and omega 3 fats they contain. Almonds are extremely

high in omega 6 and contain hardly any omega 3 whereas walnuts are a rich source. Just

one handful of walnuts will give you 100% of your ALA omega 3s for the day. Studies

have found that walnuts can help with arthritis, autoimmune diseases and other inflammatory

conditions. Walnuts are often ranked the top nut for having both, more antioxidants, polyphenols,

and a higher antioxidant potency than other nuts. Walnuts can improve memory deficits

and learning skills and may also have a beneficial effect in reducing the risk, delaying the

onset, and slowing the progression of Alzheimer's disease. Studies have also shown that Almonds

have been found to improve insulin sensitivity in adults with pre diabetes. This study found

that almonds contain prebiotic properties that could help improve our digestive health

by increasing levels of beneficial gut bacteria, which in turn also boost our body's immune

system. This study suggested that eating almonds could even protect against osteoporosis; by

inhibiting human osteoclast formation, function, and gene expression, so this means that regular

almond consumption could dramatically reduce our risk of developing osteoporosis. In his

September 2017 Q & A Dr Michael Greger was asked which he thinks are better almonds or

walnuts? So let's hear what he had to say, the link to the original video is in the description

below…… Nuts like almonds have a "bad omega 6 to omega 3 fatty acid ratio but their

consumption seems to reduce cardiovascular disease. Does this ratio not matter when eating

whole foods or should we favour walnuts when eating nuts? The reason we worry about the

omega 6 to omega 3 ratio is that we're worried about people consuming lots of junk food that

contains junky omega 6 rich oils such as cotton seed oil, sunflower, safflower, corn oil and

not enough of these wonderful short chain omega 3 fatty acids, alpha acid found in walnuts

and flax seeds, chia and hemp seeds. All nuts are good for you having said that some nuts

are healthier than others and evidence suggests that walnuts are maybe the healthiest so that

is my nut of choice but they are all good for us.

For more infomation >> Which Are Healthier For You? Almonds or Walnuts? Dr Greger - Duration: 3:27.

-------------------------------------------

Arsenal transfer news: Chris Waddle tells Unai Emery which area he MUST target today - Duration: 2:39.

 That's according to former Newcastle midfielder Chris Waddle. The Gunners have been after multiple players in the January transfer window, including the likes of Yannick Carrasco and Denis Suarez, who they've now signed

TRANSFER NEWS LIVE - UPDATES AND LATEST FROM YOUR CLUB ON DEADLINE DAYDEADLINE DAY - THE COMPLETED DEALS SO FAR ON DEADLINE DAY But Perisic, who was linked with Manchester United last summer, isn't looking like joining Arsenal either

 Waddle believes that Unai Emery shouldn't be after the Croatian anyway, as they need to strengthen in a completely different position

 "I don't understand why Arsenal are targeting Perisic," he said. "Arsenal's issues are with their defence so Perisic won't make a difference

 "They have a lot of talent going forward so they should be focusing on bringing in defensive players not attacking players

" A potential deal, however, has fallen through because Inter want to negotiate an obligatory fee for Perisic to join in the summer

 Inter wanted Arsenal to pay a loan fee of £5m before paying £30-35m for the World Cup finalist's services

 On Perisic's future, Inter director Beppe Marotta hinted that Perisic waned to leave the club

 "We've listened to the desire of the player," he said. "But we must also take into account any clubs who are interested in him and his asset value, which represents the investment Inter made when they signed him

" Suarez, however, joined the north London side on loan on Thursday, with a view to make it permanent in the summer

 The Spanish midfielder lacked sufficient game time at the Nou Camp, but Emery will look to thrust him into the starting line-up straight away, it is thought

 Suarez played under Emery when the two were at Sevilla in the 2014/15 season.

For more infomation >> Arsenal transfer news: Chris Waddle tells Unai Emery which area he MUST target today - Duration: 2:39.

-------------------------------------------

How weeks of dithering over which bricks to use helped push up the cost of new EastEnders set - Duration: 7:48.

The BBC's new EastEnders set will cost an estimated £86.7million - in part because bosses wasted weeks deciding which bricks to use

The Corporation set out plans in 2015 to rebuild and extend Albert Square, claiming that the work would be completed by October 2020 at a cost of £59

7million.But the project is set to run £27million over the original budget and is expected to be nearly five years late

BBC executive Richard Dawkins, who has been responsible for the EastEnders set project since 2017, yesterday revealed part of the overspend was due to the Corporation taking 'weeks' to agree on which bricks to use

The broadcaster spent around 11 months negotiating its contract with construction firm Wates, six months more than planned

Mr Dawkins, the £195,000-a-year chief operating officer of BBC Content, was quizzed about the project's delays and cost increase when he appeared before the Commons Public Accounts Committee yesterday (WEDS)

He said it was 'important to look at a range of different types of brick' and claimed they could have been 'fairly criticised' had they not taken time to choose the material

Labour MP Meg Hillier, chairman of the committee, said: 'I didn't think comparing bricks was part of the job description - how long did it take?' Mr Dawkins admitted: 'It was weeks

It was in the first part of last year.' The broadcaster spent £44,000 on brick samples before it signed the contract, it was revealed in a National Audit Office report last year

Labour MP Chris Evans suggested it might have been easier for BBC bosses to go to a DIY shop to look at bricks instead of delaying the project

But Mr Dawkins said it was 'really important' to 'replicate the look and feel of Walford and Albert Square'

He added: 'If you look at the current set, there are different shades of brick, we've had a look at the different types of mortar, this is not just about going and finding off your local DIY store a limited choice

It was the right thing to do.' The bricks must be tinted, moss must be applied, and the peeling paint outside the Queen Vic pub will be recreated to mimic the current set

The soap's existing set was built in 1984 using steel frames, plywood and plaster brick panels with the intention that it would be used for two years

The poor quality of the Elstree Studios set means high-definition filming is not possible and health and safety concerns can lead to filming delays

Meanwhile, BBC director-general Lord Hall admitted yesterday that the broadcaster forced some of its stars to be paid via 'personal service companies' (PSC), leaving them without sick pay or maternity benefits and now facing large tax bills

He said the Corporation accepts 'full responsibility' for 'pushing' people into the controversial arrangements as a pre-requisite of pursuing careers as presenters

The arrangement saved the Corporation millions in National Insurance payments, and looked like it would help presenters reduce their own tax bills

But it has dramatically backfired after HM Revenue and Customs later ordered some of the stars to pay back-dated tax

One anonymous presenter was told not to come back from maternity leave unless it was under the new employment arrangement

Last year, BBC Radio 4 presenter Kirsty Lang revealed to a Parliamentary committee that she even had to work throughout her cancer treatment because the Corporation would not give her sick pay

Yesterday, Labour MP Caroline Flint said that BBC stars were effectively told, 'if you want a career in presenting, you are going to have to move onto a PSC

There is no other choice.'If you want to be a shining star at the BBC, you are going to have to follow this course of action

' Asked whether he accepted this, Lord Hall said: 'Yes I acknowledge that.People were pushed into these things

We're saying that we've accepted responsibility.That's full responsibility.' The BBC previously stood by a 2012 report published by Deloitte, which found 'no evidence of any pressure to move staff to the PSC arrangements'

But yesterday Lord Hall and his deputy director-general, Anne Bulford, accepted that there was pressure regardless

Lord Hall said: 'Going back and trying to find records of how these PSCs were set up and people's correspondence with the BBC about them - we can't find any record which point to one way or the other

'But the evidence from people I've talked to is.that they were asked to take up PSCs'

For more infomation >> How weeks of dithering over which bricks to use helped push up the cost of new EastEnders set - Duration: 7:48.

-------------------------------------------

Simple vs Complex Property Investment Strategies: Which is best? - Duration: 19:24.

When it comes to investing in property, there's so many different ways you can invest. You

can invest using really simple strategies and have success things as simple as buy and

hold property, or you can invest using really complex methods, things like strata titling,

commercial properties and development subdivision. There's so many different ways that you can

invest. We want us to talk a bit about the pros and cons of simple versus complex property

investment so you can get an idea of each and decide which strategy is going to be best

for you. Hi, I'm Ryan from on Property Dot Com dot a u

helping you achieve financial freedom. Today I'm joined by Ben Everingham from pumped on

property. How's it going, Ben?

Awesome, man. Hey Don.

Yeah, very good. So you've done a mix of simple and complex investing in your own portfolio.

Um, I know that you've done that with clients as well. Really excited to talk today about

that idea of like simple versus complex. What's good, what's bad about each? So people can

decide what's best for themselves.

Yeah. So why don't we define what a simple strategy really looks like to you and me these

days because simple 10 years ago looks very complex in terms of what I thought I needed

to do. And simple today looks seriously simple.

Yeah. Well, I think a perfect example of a simple investment strategy for me is the two

properties to financial freedom strategy. Um, if you guys haven't seen that, then go

ahead and Google it, you know, it will show up and you can watch videos on that, um, or

I'll link in the description down below. But the basic concept behind that strategy is

you purchased to high quality properties. You build granny flats on each of those properties.

So you've got four incomes coming in and then you work to pay off those properties over

time. And when they're paid off, you divert the money that was going to pay off those

properties. And now all that rent is going into your pocket after the expenses of the

property. And so that's just a pretty simple strategy because all you need to do is buy

two properties or you need to do is then build to granny flats on those properties and then

basically focus on paying them off.

And so there's not a lot of complexity there. There's not a lot of niche skillsets that

you need to have in order to pull off that strategy. Um, most people can do that, assuming

they can get loans in order to purchase the properties and if they can save the deposits

and most people can actually achieve that and achieve at baseline level of financial

freedom. And then compare that to a complex strategy, which I remember talking to one

of your friends or your wedding who was investing and he was started titling commercial properties,

so he would buy 'em logic blocks of commercial property. So it might be, you know, in the

corner where you've got five or six shops or whatever it may be, but it'd be under one

title. Um, and he would then go about strata titling those properties and then selling

them off individually basically. And so you just need a very different skillset and a

more nice skillset around doing that. Developments, the same development, you can have high profit,

but there's high risk associated with it. So you need to be quite a skilled in order

to pull it off. I think like simple really, you can be a low skilled investor and have

low risk and still have a good chance of success. Complex strategies tend to have more upside

if you do it properly, but also more risk and you need to have more skills to do it.

Yeah, it's an, it's an interesting one. Um, as you said, luck. I've executed on both strategies

and what I wish I had known when I was just starting out or even middle of the way through

my journey is, you know, it doesn't have to necessarily be one or the other. You can start

with a foundation of a couple of really high quality properties with great longterm potential

for capital growth. Great upside in terms of something you might be able to do to them

in the future. And really strong cashflow maybe through a secondary dwelling on age.

And you can lock away that foundation knowing that you're going to get there in the future,

um, and then come back to sort of more complicated strategies if you want to or if you have the

right skill set where you can make those shorter term chunks of cash over a one to 10 year

period and use those jumps to pay off of debt.

So, you know, I don't think there's anything necessarily harder about buying a home and

chatting attendant in it, in the right area at the right time. Then there is the guy there

and do a subdivision. But that's probably because I'm in the property space every single

day. And you sort of learn the lessons with a good team of advisors around you. Um, oddest,

think then something glossy, are excited about doing it the hard way or the big way or the

risky way that a lot of investors get sucked into, particularly through like seminars or

get rich quick vids and all that other stuff yet. But you know, most people that actually,

it ended up much, much, much better off in Sydney 10 years ago. If they could have just

bought two properties and held them, then I would have been from, you know, making 100

or $200,000 every year speculating all the way through and then, you know, losing some

money at the top or the bottom or whatever.

Yeah. So I think, um, let's look at some of the pros and cons of the simple strategy and

then we'll look at pros and cons of the complex strategy. I think one of the pros with the

simple strategy is that it's a lot easier for people to get into. So even buying your

first property is going to be pretty overwhelming. There's a lot of stuff that you need to learn

that you need to experience for the first time working with banks and with mortgage

brokers, dealing with contracts, dealing with settlement periods, building and pest inspections.

Like that's all sort of stuff that you never get to really experience in everyday life

unless you work in the property industry and you've got to do that with a complex strategy

as well. And then some. So I think simple strategy, the pro is that most people, the

things that you need to learn can be learned quite easily or you can get through it without

really knowing much. Like it's quite difficult, like you can stuff it up, but um, you know,

it's a lot easier to wrap your head around.

Market's really, really

forgiving a simple strategy for a 10 to 15 year period where the market is brutal with

a complex strategy if you don't execute it, let alone overlaying market condition at the

time. On top of that. Yeah. And so simple strategy is that it's probably easier for

everyday investors or people who haven't invest to start investing in using that strategy

long term. It's probably more forgiving as well if you're looking at that like 10 to

15 plus year period, if be looking super short term, then I guess that's probably a more

complex strategy anyway.

You know, if you're a short term investor, which is completely cool, like I've got friends

like Tim who was at my wedding, I'm like Michael who does a lot of speculating in my life and

I look at them and I'm like, wow, it's crazy if you do it successfully, how well you can

build, you know, paper wealth or cash in the bank to be able to do other things with. But

man, it's dangerous for the average punter who doesn't understand it or you know, doesn't

do the right due diligence or doesn't have the right team of advisors around them. Um,

you know, I've got a client at the moment and she's an older lady from Sydney that you

introduced me to and she's doing this very complicated strategy. I'm in south Brisbane

at the moment on her own that she did before starting with us.

And it's a one into full lot subdivision. It's taken a two and a half years longer than

she expected. All of our cash has been tied up in it while she's doing it. And she stuffed

up the feasibility, which means she's going to exit out at a loss after four years of

her money. Now she's at a stage of life that it's very, very difficult to get that four

years back then, you know, over 55 years of age for her. And she's also lost the opportunity

to buy it, you know, close to the bottom and hold a couple of really good quality properties

in some of the other markets in Australia. So, you know, it's, it's, it's can sometimes

be a double edge sword. And I see people getting really attracted to something that's high

risk because it's flashy. But the reality is I think people can do much, much, much

better by having a baseline, you know, then then they'll ever get from just speculating

all the way through and you know, talking to a 6,000 investors now, I think in the last

five to 10 years. It's crazy. You know, after looking into their lives, how many people

just come unstuck. And I suppose that's probably. Yes. You know, they say 50 to 60 percent of

aussies actually lose money in property, which is just really difficult to believe when you

look at the longterm performance in every market in Australia.

Yeah, and I think that's like one of the cons of the simple investment strategy is that

it does take longer to make money and to achieve financial freedom, which is why so many people

are drawn to the complex strategies that promise that in three years, you know, you can make

excessive amounts of money and be financially free, which is awesome. Like if you can do

it, great, but there's more risk associated with that and I think that's why that two

properties to financial freedom strategy where you go through those stages of acquiring those

foundational properties and then you go into that stage where you're consolidating and

you're paying off those properties or like accelerating the payoff of those properties.

I really liked that idea because you don't need to achieve financial freedom in order

to get that security in your life. That you will have financial freedom in the future.

And so, I don't know. Simple strategies don't give you financial freedom short term, but

they can just be so much. There's just so much easier to implement and to make money

on long term and to get that financial security that like obviously this video is kind of

coming out bias because we both prefer simply investment strategies for the average person,

but yeah, at the end of the day it's up to people what they think is best for them.

Well, where I'm coming from is artist one, everybody in the world to achieve financial

freedom. I know I want that as well, but that's. I go, you know, because of the, how much better

the world will be when people start realizing that you know, more stuff isn't going to necessarily

make you happy or you know, have to stop doing jobs that they hate or spending time with

people that are toxic for them and they've got choices in their life to enjoy themselves.

Travel, train, start businesses, volunteer, whatever it is that people's passionate and

spend more time with their kids and family. You know, that's where this is coming from.

And I think if I look at the number of people, like something like 50 percent of builders

in Australia go bankrupt over the course of their career, 80 percent of developers in

Australia go bankrupt within a 10 year period.

It's just kind of when the professionals and the odds are against you, you know, I've gone

through three, what you've taught me from a complicated strategy, which was all about

making short term chunks of cash and getting a big chunks of equity in the bank to a cash

flow oriented properties. A separate business of mine that provides me with an income. If

I can't make an income at some point in the future through something else. And that kind

of makes you sleep better at night. You know, that kind of suits the person who liked us

as children who has a good business or a good job. And he's just looking to try and income

stream down the line. That doesn't like risk. That doesn't like huge amounts of debt that

you know, doesn't buy the heart that you have to do it the hard way and go develop or buy

10 properties in 10 years and all that other stuff that for the last 30 years in Australia

has worked because things were always good and now that we're going into different times

may not be the most effective path of least resistance to where they want to be.

Yeah, and I think you touched on something really important there, which I actually think

we should create a video around because all of the messaging is around property as a way

to get to financial freedom, but no one really talks about this concept that we've been working

on for the last year, which is property investing as an insurance policy basically. So in that

a lot of people look at property investing, achieve financial freedom, leave the job and

the life that you hate to live the life that you want. Whereas we now have kind of come

to save property, investing as an insurance policy so you invest in property that will

then go on to achieve financial freedom. For you, but then you go and live an awesome life

and you work in a job like you live an awesome life and your work in a job that you love,

that does pay your bills, that does allow your kids to go to private school or whatever

it is that you want to do, but you live in Allston live today where you're earning money,

but you've got the properties there that if something happens and you know you don't have

that job anymore, then you can fall back on those properties until you find something

else to work out or until you find something else that you're passionate about.

So this idea that property investing is an insurance policy. I like that for the simple

investment strategy and that also people who have an awesome life. Now I say the complex

strategy really can be a really great way to make large chunks of cash to accelerate

your financial freedom to move you forward towards. I think towards that really high

level of wealth as well. And so complex strategies are great for people who are maybe already

invested using simple strategies and they want to take the knowledge and the skills

that they've built, they want to expand on that. They want to grow themselves. A complex

more complex strategies can be a great way to do that and they can niche down and find

specific opportunities. Bucket once you had the skills, they're complex strategies can

be low risk if you invest properly and if you had the skills to do it properly and can

be a great way to build wealth way faster than the simple strategies,

you know, in terms of my investment strategy moving forward, knowing what I know I'm going

to have this low risk, high quality bread and butter, sort of strong cash flow, strong

longterm growth thing going on here.

So that makes you financially secure, right? And financially for a. and so then it's like

layers. You've got that foundational layer that no matter what happens, you can fall

back on that and survive. And then I'm guessing you're going to add on top of that is the

higher risk stuff, but high return, that's it. Like you know, you can take that risk

because you've got the foundation

exactly and you know it. It looked like buying existing properties first for me and then

I started renovating and then I started building granny flats and then I've built four or five

brand new properties and then I moved to subdivisions. So you've got this buy and hold really high

quality stuff, but then over time as you build those skill sets that enables you to take

away some of the risk associated with actually actioning it and your marketing intelligence,

your ability to do, to analyze things properly and the processes you have become stronger

and that enables the mistakes to sort of or some of the risks to disappear market condition

dependent. So it doesn't. Again, it doesn't have to be one or the other. I just think

starting off with the foundation is a really smart thing. If I was doing it all again,

I'll just go straight up hard at two properties to granny flats and as soon as I'd done that

I would be going, okay. What does more of that look like? Versus more of shorter term

chunks of cash to be up to speed this process up.

Yeah. Well then you've got your foundation, you've got that insurance policy and then

you can decide, okay, do I want to do more of the same thing? Do I want to go for big

chunks of equity so that I can do other things? You kind of had that flexibility to choose

it once you had that foundation there

for sure, and that's in a very, very supportive environment where it's very difficult for

me to fail with property, like getting to spend every single day in this industry for

seven years. Father-In-Laws brother, builder brother-in-laws or built out other brother-in-law's

of builder. Almost all of my mates are tradies or share trainees or crypto traders or property

investors or business owners and it's kind of like as these pool of people that I'm constantly

associating with that have these ideas, get all of that support and that team of advisors

and people that you can lean on like Eileen on you. There's zero chance I would've been

able to be successful in that in a lot of people, like 10 years ago. I didn't have any

of that support and it was much easier to fail. It was much easier to make big mistakes

without understanding that I was making him. So I, that

I think as well something that people should be aware of and something that's really helped

you is that you aren't driven by like grade to do like a quick deal. Like I remember you

did that deal in the past where you're going to. It was like a development deal where you're

gonna meet. Yeah. Guaranteed. Like 100 grand. Yeah. Ended up losing tens of thousands of

dollars on that deal because you just jumped at it and was in a way like a bit naive and

a bit greedy. Whereas now like good deals come past you and you're like, Nah, I'm not

going to do that. And then you wait. A great deal comes up and you're like, okay, like

I, I guess I guess I'll do it. So you know, you had that um, self diligence and that knowledge

to pass on things to not get greedy just because it's one opportunity that came past you, like

I've seen you really wait for the right opportunities before you jump on them. And so that's something

to be aware of as well with the more complex strategies is that if you have the patience

to wait for those deals that are exactly the right fit for you, that are lower risk, but

still have a good chance of return that really fit your skillset. If you can wait for those

and not be greedy and just jump on any deal that you think is going to make money, then

that's going to increase your chances of success as well.

Absolutely. Like the quality of your future is determined by the quality of your day to

day habits and the quality of, I suppose, the systems that you put in place in the analysis

that you put in place to actually make sure that you get the right outcome in patients

in

focus is absolutely key. With this stuff that we've talked about on so many other videos,

so they have some pros and cons of simple versus complex property investment strategies.

I think really our message came across quite clear that we support starting with a simple

strategy that really builds a solid foundation for financial security and financial freedom.

And then once you've got that, then expanding upon that, but obviously what you decided

to do is up to you if you want to pursue complex development strategies and then by all means,

go for it. We wish you the absolute best. Build up your skills, become an awesome developer.

You know, you do you and you do what suits you and your financial goals. Um, what we

talked about today really lines up with us and our financial goals as well as like the

clients in the audience that we tend to work with and speak to.

So we hope that this has been helpful to you. If you would like to sit down and talk to

someone and try and get clear on what your next steps are to begin investing in property

and moving towards financial freedom. Then ben and Simon and the team over at pumped

on property are offering free strategy session so you can get on the phone with them, get

clear on where you're at, where you want to be, and what you need to do to get there.

That's a really invaluable resource that they're offering for free, so head over to on-property

dot com dot a u. You can book a free strategy session over there at a time that suits you,

but yeah, thanks so much for tuning in today, everyone. We wish you the most success in

your property journey and until next time, stay positive.

For more infomation >> Simple vs Complex Property Investment Strategies: Which is best? - Duration: 19:24.

-------------------------------------------

✅ Breaking News - Konta loses against Muguruza during the Australian Open match which ends at 3:12 - Duration: 5:43.

Absurd and dramatic, Jo Konta's Australian Open hopes came to an end at 3.12am after an agonising defeat that threatened to run towards breakfast time

Delayed in part because an alternative court was covered in seagull droppings, the British No 1's early hours shift came to nothing when she was beaten 6-4, 6-7, 7-5 by former Wimbledon champion Garbine Muguruza

It had been the latest-starting match in tournament history, getting underway at 12

30am, but the quality on show from both players belied the ridiculous hour at which they were asked to ply their trade

A little bit of Australian Open folklore will not be much consolation to Konta, and more comforting will be the fact that this was her best performance since Wimbledon 2017

She declined to complain about the surreal scheduling at an event that is tennis's answer to the Le Mans 24 hours race, but this was no time to send out two athletes to perform

That they reached such a high level was a tribute to both their professionalism.'It wasn't ideal for anyone

I don't think it's ideal for anyone to do any physical activity when it's bedtime, but it is what it is and both of us were in the same boat,' said Konta

Share this article Share The ludicrous timing was caused by a series of matches on Margaret Court Arena going the full distance, and at one point outside Court No 3 was being prepared as an alternative venue

The tournament could have acted sooner.'Once (the preceding) Zverev and Chardy match went to a fifth set, we were actually going to go out to Court 3 to start, but there was basically seagull poo everywhere,' she explained

'They had to clean the court and by the time they would have cleaned the court, it would have taken 10-15 minutes and we were in the same boat anyway

'Ideally, both of us would have wanted to play earlier - this is no-one's ideal schedule to play in the wee hours of the morning - but we don't make the schedule and we both dealt with the same challenge

'I think it was a high level in general, both of us played really well. I think she started better than I did, but then I think I did a good job of raising my level to make it a competitive match

It's more important to focus on the level of the match and it was unfortunate that more people couldn't enjoy it during the day

'While it was the latest starting contest it was not the one that finished most deep into the early hours

That accolade still belongs to Lleyton Hewitt and Marcos Baghdatis, who in 2008 got off court at 4

38am.By becoming the final second round match to finish Konta at least stretched out British singles participation in the season's first Grand Slam, which came to an end when Muguruza suddenly found some piercing returns to seize the moment when a deciding tiebreak looks inevitable

Eight players started in the main draw, a healthy enough number, but this is the fourth Major in succession in which no British singles player has gone beyond the middle Saturday

Konta deserves no censure for that, because for guts and application this had echoes of Andy Murray's attempted comeback over on the Melbourne Arena on Monday night

It suggests she will have a rebound season.Around 1,000 hardy souls were dotted around the arena, including a couple of locals who had clearly been imbibing most of the evening and were eventually escorted out

Muguruza set out to hit the ball as hard as she could, and while she can be erratic her depth and power were impressive through the first set

She broke in the first game and although Konta responded in fashion the Spaniard held on, saving a break back point at 3-4

With both players continuing to pulverise the ball and the crowd thinning the purposeful Konta began to look the more threatening, but she hit a forehand marginally wide on the break point she created at 2-1 in the second set

Konta looked the more secure player going into the tie-break, which was interrupted at 1-1 for the roof to be entirely closed to keep out a rain shower

It hardly put her off and she lifted her game thereafter, taking it 7-3 as the time hit 2

20am.The clock had struck three as they duelled their way to 4-4, both players unyielding and Konta playing better than she has done since reaching the semi-finals of Wimbledon 18 months ago

It was a cruel way to end when Muguruza found some big returns at 5-6, winning a match that neither participant deserved to lose

Share this article Share

For more infomation >> ✅ Breaking News - Konta loses against Muguruza during the Australian Open match which ends at 3:12 - Duration: 5:43.

-------------------------------------------

James Gunn will probably direct the Suicide Squad sequel, which is being called a "relaunch" - Duration: 2:06.

Photo: Christian Petersen (Getty Images) As DC Comics continues to (successfully) bleed the smothering darkness from its lame slate of comic book adaptations, here comes news that Guardians Of The Galaxy director James Gunn could lend his whimsical approach to Warner Bros.'s Suicide Squad sequel

News of Gunn's involvement was first reported back in October, when it was revealed he would write the script

Now, along with a number of other enticing details, The Hollywood Reporter is making it sound like he's a lock for the director's chair

 That news is especially exciting in light of Gunn's rocky 2018, which saw him fired from Guardians Of The Galaxy Vol

3 after a bad-faith campaign led by right-wing grifters (and mainstreamed by ding-dongs like Ted Cruz) resurfaced some of the director's gross-out joke tweets from 2008, when he was working in the splattery Troma-verse

What's also exciting is that Gunn's vision—titled The Suicide Squad—is reportedly not a direct sequel to David Ayer's exhausting original, but rather a "relaunch." Advertisement "Sources say that Gunn's focus is to take the franchise in a new direction with a mostly all-new cast of characters and actors," THR writes

"Sources also say that the project is also very much rooted in Gunn's vibe, as seen in the Guardians movies." It makes sense, as Margot Robbie's Harley Quinn-focused Birds Of Prey looks to exist in a lighter, more subversive universe than that of Suicide Squad

One can assume she'll return for the relaunch, which also, unfortunately, means we're probably stuck with Jared Leto's "damaged" Joker, what with the pair set to undergo couple's counseling in another potential spin-off

As for Will Smith and the rest of the Squad? Ditch 'em, we say. Hell, you've got Dave Bautista waiting in the wings

 The Suicide Squad is slated for a release date of August 2021.Advertisement

For more infomation >> James Gunn will probably direct the Suicide Squad sequel, which is being called a "relaunch" - Duration: 2:06.

-------------------------------------------

AUTONEW UPDATE-The New 2019 Audi Q8 newer turbocharged, which makes 335 horsepower. - Duration: 12:09.

For more infomation >> AUTONEW UPDATE-The New 2019 Audi Q8 newer turbocharged, which makes 335 horsepower. - Duration: 12:09.

-------------------------------------------

10 MAGIC MATERIALS WHICH YOU SHOULD NOT TRY | BANGLA HISTORY | HD - Duration: 7:44.

Top 10 Magic Materials for Science Experiments

For more infomation >> 10 MAGIC MATERIALS WHICH YOU SHOULD NOT TRY | BANGLA HISTORY | HD - Duration: 7:44.

-------------------------------------------

The fascinating backstory of the periodic table, which is about to turn 150 years old - Duration: 19:26.

The periodic table has become an icon of science. Its rows and columns provide a tidy way of showcasing the elements — the ingredients that make up the universe

Advertisement >  It seems obvious today, but it wasn't to generations of early chemists

That changed when Dmitri Mendeleev started writing a textbook and pondered ways to group the elements together in order to lighten his load

 The Russian chemist spotted an elegant and powerful pattern: He recognized that certain elements exhibited similar traits, and that these traits varied regularly — or periodically — with increasing atomic weight

 So on Feb. 17, 1869 (according to the Julian calendar used in Russia at that time), Mendeleev published a chart of the 60-odd elements known at the time, sorted by their weights and properties

He called it "An At­tempt at a System of Elements, Based on Their Atomic Weight and Chemical Af­finity

" When Dmitri Mendeleev first published his periodic table of elements, it was far less complete than the version we know today

(Dmitri Mendeleev)  It has come to be regarded as one of the greatest scientific contributions of all time

 That's why the United Nations and the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry are celebrating the 150th anniversary of Mendeleev's periodic table

The festivities kicked off in Paris on Tuesday.  The journal Science is marking the occasion with a special issue about the table, which includes an essay on its origins by Michael Gordin, a science historian at Princeton University

Gordin spoke with The Times about Mendeleev's invention and its scientific legacy

Why has the periodic table endured for 150 years?  It's an amazing tool that can compress a huge amount of information into one format

It's one of the first things people learn about chemistry. It's in every textbook

It's on the wall of pretty much every chemistry classroom in the world. Almost every science classroom has the periodic table on display

(Patrick Downs / Los Angeles Times) How did it come about?  Dmitri Mendeleev was writing a textbook when he came up with the idea

It was a scheme he put together in order to help organize the elements in families so that he didn't have to spend time doing each element individually

How did it work?  The table is organized by increasing atomic weight, but broken into rows

When Mendeleev did that, he saw that certain elements have very similar properties — they form acids that have similar strength, they form crystals that look the same

 So, in addition to increasing atomic weight, he saw that there is some other pattern that repeats

He's the one who invented the term "periodic." Did he realize he was onto something big?  I think he perceived a pattern that could be one of two things

Is it just a convenient teaching tool, or is it a deep pattern in nature? He saw it both ways

 Over time, he became more convinced that he had discovered a law of nature. That's normal for scientific findings — when you first propose something, you don't know it's true yet

Would you say Mendeleev "discovered" the modern periodic table?  I usually say that Mendeleev formulated or invented the table

The reason I don't say discovered is that it's not like it's a rock or a mountain

It's a set of relations among things that are like rocks or mountains. Advertisement > But he wasn't the only chemist working on a table 150 years ago, was he?  That's right

There were six different formulations of the table in the 1860s. What sets his table apart?  The first thing is that Mendeleev does all the elements

Previous people had put in many or most, but hadn't done all of them because they weren't sure about the atomic weights

Mendeleev made guesses about their weights to fit them in the table.  The second thing is that he predicted the existence of new elements

When those elements are discovered, his table stands out.  The third reason is that he was very insistent during his lifetime that he deserved credit for the periodic table

Let's back up a minute. How did Mendeleev predict the existence of undiscovered elements?  There are several hypotheses by historians because he didn't write down his thought process

 When Mendeleev started lining up elements with similar properties into columns, he noticed that, in some places, an element seemed to be in the wrong place and should be one column over

When he moved it over, everything worked out. But then there's an empty gap. And he's like, "OK, how do I explain what's in the gap?" And how did he explain it?  He said, "Well, its atomic weight should be about this, because I can average from the elements around it and guess it

" And he's like, "I know what its crystal structure should be. And I know something about what kinds of acids it would form, because it has those properties of the elements above and below it

" A 1947 edition of Dmitri Mendeleev's periodic table of elements is shown. (Sovfoto / UIG via Getty Images)  Within 15 years, three of the elements he predicted in detail were discovered

And they had exactly the properties he said they would. So other chemists didn't make predictions?  Other people recognized that there was a pattern

But they didn't guess about the properties of the elements.  Mendeleev's main competitor is a German named Lothar Meyer

Meyer made a few versions of a similar table in the 1860s, but he never made predictions

He thought it was reckless to guess. He's like, "Chemists shouldn't be doing that, because we don't yet know enough

" What was going on in the 1860s that gave everyone the idea to make tables of the elements?  Today, the periodic table is organized by atomic number, which is the number of protons in the nucleus

But they didn't know about protons then, so they organized everything by atomic weight

They had what they thought were accurate atomic weights for all the elements, but some of those weights were measured by different systems

 Then, in 1860, there was an international meeting of chemists in Germany. Mendeleev happened to be there because he was studying nearby

They propose a unified way of organizing the atomic weights, and when they do that, they correct a whole bunch of atomic weights

 Within a year or two, people started seeing these patterns. Were there earlier attempts to organize the elements?  Yes

One method was alphabetical, which was very common.  The other organized elements by their ability to bond together

So you would create a table and say, sulfur bonds really well with this and this and this, in this order

They look like periodic tables, but they are totally different. They don't list all of the elements, and things appear several times

Do we know what kind of guy Mendeleev was?  We actually know a lot about him. He was born in a Siberian city called Tobolsk, which is almost in the exact center of Russia

He ended up in St. Petersburg for education, and he stayed there most of his life — he taught at the University of St

Petersburg — but traveled very broadly. He was very boisterous, kind of funny, quick to lose his temper, but also clearly very charismatic and engaging

He was also very politically active. He was in the papers a lot.  After he finished the table, he decided he would start keeping all of his mail and all of his letters because he knew he would be famous

He's the kind of person who cared about his legacy and thought of himself quite well

Advertisement > Did he become famous in his lifetime?  Yes. He did the table when he was 35, in 1869, and he lived until 1907

The table became more and more central to chemistry over the course of his life, so he became internationally well known

Scientists didn't really understand atoms until after Mendeleev died. How did that change the table?  We now organize the table based on quantum theory — on the positions the electrons in the outer shell of an atom have

That explains their chemical properties because the electrons determine how they bind with other elements

 Mendeleev didn't know any of that. The electron was discovered in 1897, and he didn't like that idea

He didn't like many of these new ideas. When people discovered new things he couldn't put in the table, he got very frustrated

It bothered him.  But later, Niels Bohr, the Danish physicist who's one of the architects of quantum theory, published a very interesting version of the periodic table that incorporates the insights of the quantum vision of the atom to help explain how the system works

It silenced those who thought the table was just a lucky guess. What else has changed over the last 150 years?  All of these new elements that have been discovered, the very heavy elements

They are principally results of using colliders and things like that to make them

They live for a very short period of time — microseconds. But filling out the table has taught us a great deal about how the nuclei of these atoms work

Kosuke Morita of the Riken Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science in Japan points to element 113 on the periodic table

Japanese scientists created the highly radioactive element, which they named Nihonium

(Kyodo News via Associated Press)  We now understand why there are as many columns in the table as there are, and how many rows down we can go before the atom becomes too unstable

We now have a table with no gaps, and that gives us a real feeling of understanding nature

Is the table complete now?  I'm sure somebody will try to create new elements so you could build further rows

But the question of whether it's worth the investment for the amount of knowledge we get is a question that scientists and politicians would have to answer

It's not my business to decide. Is there anything about the modern periodic table that would have surprised Mendeleev?  I think he would have been really surprised at how heavy the elements can get, that we've been able to get to 118

 But I think he would have been very gratified that the table is still omnipresent — that this thing he did is still around

 This interview was edited for length and clarity. Support our journalism Please consider subscribing today to support stories like this one

Get full access to our signature journalism for just 99 cents for the first four weeks

Already a subscriber? Your support makes our work possible. Thank you.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét