Chủ Nhật, 17 tháng 2, 2019

Youtube daily is the new Feb 17 2019

There is a new 80s mix pack on Music Maker Jam!

I'm so excited!

These vocals are not MMJ (added externally)

The time travel pack means massive synths, pads and ...

Drums!

In the 2nd half of this video, we'll also do an 80s ballad.

Vocals from the J-Pop pack take a trip on the time machine to the 80s.

No 80s song without hovering pads

"CuteSwedishPopChords" added from J-Pop

But where are the guitars?!?

I love the "Gloria Poly" synth melody.

Gloria also plays guitar

Quintessential: The melodic chord changes.

But this pack can do more than disco dancing.

After the guitar solo we'll explore slow dancing.

Guitar Solo?!?

The pack also has its own vocals ...

... but they are no match for Gloria's synth

But what does Jennifer Rush have to do with all of this?

Well, it turns out that you can also time travel to slow dancing in the school gym in 1984.

Bass lines like this were all the rage in 1984.

Just like electric pianos, mullets and Jennifer Rush.

Boring

How about adding a Dubstep loop?

Note: These are not MMJ vocals (added externally).

Let's check if they give us any other ballad material.

There is a pad named Whitney

Whitney was so big in 1985 ...

... that MMJ also named a bass after her.

... and drums. And an Electric Piano.

Ironically, the singer is not named Whitney.

But guess the name of the synth melody...

What could they possibly name the guitar?

Next up: A look at the official demo song.

But first, let's listen to the Time Travel vocals.

They have a lead-in that I neglected here.

Oops!

Better check the demo song (coming up in a few seconds)

this is the demo song

Don't' forget to leave a comment like or subscribe.

More MMJ stuff at www.facebook.com/superjam..academy

www.facebook.com/superjam.academy

For more infomation >> Jennifer, Rush! I'm SO EXCITED about the new 80s pack on #musicmakerjam! I spent 330 free Beatcoins - Duration: 10:30.

-------------------------------------------

The Jussie Smollett Hoax is the New Ice Bucket Challenge - Duration: 5:41.

This is Philip Wyeth. Pretty ecstatic right now that the Jussie Smollett hate crime

hoax story's falling apart. Why? Because on the night of the alleged

attack, I wrote this on Twitter in response to the claim that the people

who attacked him said, "This is MAGA country!"

I wrote, "This is Egg-On-Your-Face country." Millions of credulous fools allowing

themselves to be whipped into a Pavlovian frenzy by media manipulators.

But 'the feels' of virtue signaling are too good to resist." Now here we are, two, three

weeks later, and it's all falling apart in outrageous fashion. Every day some new

ridiculous detail is coming out. Will this guy take the fall? Will he go to

prison? Or will it just be one of those things where in the media, "He needs to

take some time for himself, he needs to go to rehab"? And there would be no

consequences for what? Essentially slandering white people, Republicans,

Trump supporters. But what gets me about this whole Smollett thing is it reminds

me of the Ice Bucket Challenge a few years ago. Who had the courage to resist

doing that stupid shit? You know, it took on a life of its own, and so every friend,

every co-worker, every relative kept retweeting or forwarding the Facebook

videos of them taking it, and "I challenge you." And this time it was the celebrities,

the politicians, the media pouncing on this story dujor about some sort of

hate crime. How many of these high-profile people are now gonna post,

"Hey, I was wrong. I had the Fox Mulder reaction from X-Files.

I want to believe." They all wanted to believe that this crime was true because

it allowed them to believe in their narrative, and then do some sort of

public display of... reconciliation, lecturing, self-righteousness about, "We

need to have that conversation." But now that it's all falling apart and proving

to be a lie... No, we need to have this conversation, where jerks like me, assholes

like me who called it out--because my spidey sense was correct weeks ago--I was

the one who was right. Yeah, I'm a straight white guy who called bullshit

on it the day of, while all of you got to pat each other on the back for weeks

because you're part of this self-righteous, progressive,

forward-thinking--allegedly--movement. When in truth it was all a lie.

How many other hate hoaxes have been a lie since the 2016 election?

Remember the Muslim girl who said that guys in MAGA hats ripped off her hijab?

Turns out she was late for her curfew and didn't want to get her dad mad. And

when she went into court a few days later, her head had been shaved by her

father for lying to him! Where were you calling him out for his

toxic masculinity? We're not even two months into the year

and we've had a handful of these events that, on the surface were one thing, which

made straight white males for the most part look bad--and then when the real

story came out, it was anything but us who did it. When will you learn? Or

because you're part of this axis of the education, media, entertainment matrix you

never face consequences for your incorrect assumptions. Your slanders, your

lies. How much money has the Chicago Police Department wasted that could have been

spent on tracking down real criminals, chasing down this lie? How many times are

you allowed to bear false witness against your political enemies before

you face real-life consequences, and not just a retraction or a correction on

page 28 of the newspaper? And all of the websites like TMZ, New York Times, Good

Morning America on TV, who made money on this story, promoting it, not doing their

due diligence on the facts. Do you have to return that money, or maybe donate it

to a charity in the same way that a celebrity or politician gets in trouble

has to essentially give money to some organization that is tangentially

related to the party they aggrieved? I think at the root of this we can track

down conformity as being one of the worst afflictions of modern American

life. And it's particularly evident among the political Left, because they're in

this arms race of going along to get along. I remember when I was at a cigar

shop last year and there was one man I was talking to, probably around my age,

late thirties, smart guy, a lawyer. And he was saying something to the effect of, "change

equals progress." And I disagree, and here's two examples why. Let's say you

lose your arm in a car accident. That is a change, but that is not progress. You

find out you have a tumor on your arm. Again, that is a change but that is not

progress. My guess is that even if Jussie Smollett did

some kind of perp walk press conference, like Tiger Woods did years ago, the true

believers who tweeted about this, wrote articles about it, held rallies about it...

They just will not be able to back down and let it go. They are too invested in

this narrative. You just can't reason with people or so

bought into a certain ideology, narrative, group hug mentality that they are not

capable of healthy skepticism, common sense, or just waiting to see how things

play out. Because the rewards are instant in the Twitter, Instagram, Facebook world.

The bottom line is that the people who are skeptical and had to hold out, hold

the line for the past few weeks and are now proven right tonight--all you've done

is reduced the level of patience or pity we would have for such stories. "The Boy

Who Cried Wolf" is a fable that has stood the test of time for a reason. And it's

now not just the boy who cried wolf, because we can't assume his gender! But

it's basically an ideology that has cried wolf, a mob that has cried wolf. And

I just think that if you keep trying to pull these things over the next couple

of years, you're taking us to the breaking point. And you really don't want

to see what happens when we get that glaze over our eyes and

we just don't care anymore what you think.

For more infomation >> The Jussie Smollett Hoax is the New Ice Bucket Challenge - Duration: 5:41.

-------------------------------------------

The New Adventures of Winnie the Pooh Intro Mashup Remix Vocal Swap - Duration: 1:02.

Gotta get up

I gotta get going

I'm gonna see a friend of mine.

He's round and he's fuzzy

I love him because he's just

Pooh Bear, Winnie the Pooh Bear

Lookin' for fun

Chasing some honey bees

Pooh Bear, I know he's out there

Grumbly Tumbly

Clumbin' a Honey Tree

Fun never ends for us

We're so adventurous

Least every now and again

And when were alone

And there's nobody home

It's nice to be able

to count on a friend like

Pooh Bear, Winnie the Pooh Bear

Wherever you go

Oh, Won't you take me please

Pooh Bear, I gotta be there.

It's me and it's you

My silly old Winnie the Pooh

For more infomation >> The New Adventures of Winnie the Pooh Intro Mashup Remix Vocal Swap - Duration: 1:02.

-------------------------------------------

ODD SQUAD | The New Big O | PBS KIDS - Duration: 3:08.

it is my pleasure to award you all plates

with pasta glued on them.

I made this.

Thank you.

- I made this. - Thank you. Ooh.

I made this.

Well done.

- I found this. - Oh, okay.

[applause]

Welcome back, Agent Otis.

[all cheer]

Good to have you back, partner.

Good to be back.

For far too long, I've put off going to kindergarten,

but now it is time,

and I need someone to take my place.

Wait, are you saying...?

I want you to run all Odd Squads

as the new Big O.

[all applaud and cheer]

[all applaud and cheer]

That's the last of the juice boxes.

You're all packed up.

Guess it's time to say goodbye.

Whew. Well, see you guys later.

What? No.

Ms. O is leaving.

You taught us everything we know.

Now you know it.

Plus, you taught me, too.

[Olympia, Otis, Oona] Whaaaaaaaat?!

Are we still going?

Whaaat?

Oona, I never thought anyone could come close

to filling Oscar's shoes.

You taught me sometimes even the boss is wrong.

Thank you, ma'am.

Otis, you taught me people can change

for the better.

And lawn bowling.

It's a fairly simple sport.

Olympia, you taught me to always look

on the bright side.

The way you love Odd Squad made me love it even more.

It's been the honor of my life to work with you.

And I've lived a long time.

I'll miss you.

Us, too.

Put that away.

And bring it in.

Do me a favor: go easy on your new boss.

Uh, Ms. O, I know Orson has lots of experience,

but how are we supposed to understand him?

[baby talk]

Easy. Right now, he's saying

something very odd has happened.

[explosion]

[explosions, chickens clucking]

Guess I can stick around a little longer.

Well, what are we waiting for?

[all] GO!

For more infomation >> ODD SQUAD | The New Big O | PBS KIDS - Duration: 3:08.

-------------------------------------------

Sport TV - What Brighton's FA Cup win means for the new Tottenham stadium - Duration: 3:21.

 Spurs fans are desperate for the club to move into their stunning new home in the coming weeks after a long time away from N17

 Spending the whole of last season at Wembley, the Lilywhites were expected to be in their new stadium for the start of this campaign but the opening date has continued to be pushed back

 With the club revealing that the north London derby against Arsenal at the start of next month will be played at the national stadium, no announcement has been made regrading the home fixture against Crystal Palace on Sunday, March 17

 However, there is a real possibility that the game against the Eagles will have to be rearranged due to the club's involvement in the FA Cup

   The quarter-finals of the famous competition are due to be played that weekend and Palace take on League One side Doncaster Rovers on Sunday afternoon for a place in the final eight

 Given that many expect Roy Hodgson's side to advance to the next round with a win at the Keepmoat Stadium, that means Spurs' home game against Brighton & Hove Albion could potentially be the first game back in N17

 With the Palace fixture set to be rearranged providing they beat Doncaster, the game against the Seagulls could also be moved due to their FA Cup run

 The semi-finals are due to take place the same weekend Brighton are down to play in north London and Chris Hughton's side are now into the quarter-finals following their 2-1 win over Derby County on Saturday afternoon

 That means Spurs could potentially face a hectic end to the season with rearranged games against Crystal Palace and Brighton, as well as the fact they could also be in the latter stages of the Champions League the same month

 The draw for the final eight is due to take place on Monday evening and all Spurs fans will no doubt have their fingers crossed that Brighton get one of Man City, Chelsea or Manchester United in the next round

Keep up to date with the latest Tottenham Hotspur news, features and exclusives from football

london via our free WhatsApp service . Text NEWS to 07776197989 and then add the number to your phone contacts book as spurs dot london (case sensitive, with spaces) to receive daily updates and breaking news from Alasdair Gold and the team on Spurs

Your phone number won't be shared with any other members of the group. Click here for more information on the service

For more infomation >> Sport TV - What Brighton's FA Cup win means for the new Tottenham stadium - Duration: 3:21.

-------------------------------------------

HOT | Aurora Sh00ting Updates 5 Killed and Several Others Wounded The New York Times - Duration: 5:14.

HOT | Aurora Sh00ting Updates 5 Killed and Several Others Wounded The New York Times

By and

AURORA, Ill. — A former warehouse employee who had recently lost his job stormed through his old workplace in suburban Chicago on Friday, killing five workers and injuring five police officers.

The gunman, whom the authorities identified as Gary Martin, 45, of Aurora, Ill., was killed in an exchange of gunfire with officers.

His sister, Tameka Martin, said Mr. Martin had worked at the Henry Pratt Companys industrial warehouse for about 20 years before he was let go two weeks ago. The police said they believed that Mr. Martin had lost his job even more recently, on Friday.

A worker received non life threatening injuries in the shooting at the companys warehouse, where valves and control devices used in water and power systems are designed.

Scores of law enforcement authorities swarmed the facility in Aurora, about 40 miles west of downtown Chicago; sections of the city were cordoned off; and schools were forced to keep students inside for more than an hour.

By late Friday, officials said they were notifying the families of those who had died, and would not yet release their names.

Four hospitals reported treating at least seven people who were hurt. Among the wounded were five Aurora police officers who were shot and a sixth officer who was injured responding to the gunfire inside the warehouse. The officers injuries were not believed to be life threatening.

The first calls of a shooting at the warehouse began pouring in at 1:24 p.m. local time, Kristen Ziman, Auroras police chief, said. The first officers arrived four minutes later, rushing in and immediately being shot at, she said. Two of the first four officers to arrive were shot.

Chief Ziman said officers from other departments converged on the site, and teams were assembled to search for the gunman inside the sprawling, 29,000 square foot building. When they eventually found him, about 90 minutes after the search began, they shot and killed him, she said. The police said he was armed with a handgun.

John Probst, an employee who was in the building at the time, told ABC 7 Chicago that he recognized the gunman, a co worker, running down the aisle with a pistol that had a green laser attached to it.

He said he saw one person who was shot and was bleeding pretty bad. He believed there were others who had been shot in the office. He said he and another co worker ran out the back door, and he heard more shots once he was outside.

Officials from Mueller Water Products, of which the Henry Pratt Company is a subsidiary, issued a statement late Friday expressing shock and sadness.

Our hearts are with the victims and their loved ones, the first responders, the Aurora community and the entire Mueller family during this extremely difficult time, the statement said. Our entire focus is on the health and well being of our colleagues, and we are committed to providing any and all support to them and their families.

The officials did not respond to specific questions, and employees reached by phone on Friday night said they had been told not to comment. The company, founded in 1901, has its headquarters in Aurora, according to its website, and also has manufacturing facilities in Washington State and Indiana.

Ms. Martin said she had seen her brother a few days ago at a dinner at her mothers house, and she described him as very depressed, very depressed. She added, He really didnt say too much to me.

Mr. Martins family members met with officers at the Police Department late Friday; some embraced and wept.

The authorities conducted a search of Mr. Martins home on Friday night.

For hours on Friday afternoon, a chaotic scene played out in Aurora, a city of 200,000 residents, as fire trucks, ambulances and police squad cars jammed the neighborhood of houses and warehouses.

Worried parents waited as schools — including one not far from the warehouse — ordered students to shelter in place for more than an hour. Officers searched the blocks around the warehouse. Rescue officials stood by waiting to carry more patients to hospitals. And officials from the coroners office were called.

Its a shame that mass shootings such as this have become commonplace in our country, Mayor Richard C. Irvin of Aurora said. Its a shame that a cold and heartless offender would be so selfish as to think he has a right to take an innocent life.

By evening, political leaders from around the nation began issuing news releases and posting messages on social media offering sympathy and support.

The White House said that President Trump had been briefed on the situation and was monitoring it. J. B. Pritzker, the new governor of Illinois, traveled to Aurora and praised the police officers who ran inside during the shooting.

You rushed toward danger, and in doing that you saved countless lives, Mr. Pritzker said.

Rosalee Andrada, 54, lives in a house on Cleveland Avenue, only steps from the building where the shooting took place. She had just taken her daily medication when she heard sharp staccato sounds coming from outside.

I thought it was just ice cracking, she said.

But her husband, Jose, hustled her and their husky, Rocky, into the basement. She said she heard five shots in total.

Rocky was anxious and wanted to come upstairs, Ms. Andrada said, so they climbed the basement steps and looked through the kitchen window. Countless police officers had converged on the scene, a cacophony of lights and sirens.

She saw three officers helping a wounded colleague, who held his hand to his neck.

They were carrying out their brother, she said.

For more infomation >> HOT | Aurora Sh00ting Updates 5 Killed and Several Others Wounded The New York Times - Duration: 5:14.

-------------------------------------------

Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times - Duration: 2:34.

Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times

Its time to reckon with the internal contradictions of climate policy.

Opinion Columnist

Is Nancy Pelosi a climate skeptic? Of course not — . But you might be excused for thinking so, given the curt wave off the House speaker delivered to the liberally ballyhooed, legislatively stillborn

The green dream, or whatever they call it, nobody knows what it is, but theyre for it, right? That was Pelosi talking about the deal as if it were a grandchilds latest video game obsession. The San Francisco Democrat is nothing if not a political realist, and that kind of realism means that no Congress is going to mobilize the country to fight climate change as if it were an alien invasion, as my colleague Farhad Manjoo .

Higher mileage standards, more subsidies for wind and solar, signing the Paris climate deal? Those are the sorts of policies Nancy Pelosi believes in, and would happily endorse if stars align under a future Democratic president.

But obtaining 100 percent of Americas power needs through renewable energy, upgrading all existing buildings in the United States to meet maximal efficiency standards, and dealing with the issue of cow flatulence by reducing meat consumption, as the Green New Deal proposes? Fuhgeddaboudit.

Then again, if climate change is a potentially humanity wrecking event, why shouldnt we treat it as an alien invasion equivalent? Lets assume and we dont have a moment to lose in substantially decarbonizing the global economy, no matter what the financial cost or political pain. In that case, isnt Pelosis incrementalist approach to climate absurdly inadequate?

Isnt it, in fact, like trying to put out a forest fire with a plant mister?

Marxists of old liked to talk about the fundamental contradictions of capitalism. Today we should also reckon with the contradictions of climate policy. Are we dealing with a problem so severe that it requires the of war socialism? Or should we think of climate change roughly the same way we think about global poverty — a serious problem we can work patiently to solve without resort to extreme measures like or depriving of the attention they deserve?

If its the former, then another windmill subsidy or carbon trading scheme wont do. We need to take extreme measures: to declare a , every citizens carbon footprint, raise taxes on the rich and middle class alike to fund trillions of dollars in green infrastructure projects worldwide, and even impose economic sanctions on China and India if they dont stop .

If the latter, however, then can we at least end the apocalyptic talk, especially since we arent prepared to take more than piecemeal steps?

So far, activists have been able to elide this contradiction, claiming both that climate change is a , and that we can deal with it relatively easily. That may do wonders for public awareness — do your part and bike to work! — but it is self deceiving, if not dishonest. Whatever else might be said of it, the Green New Deal blows the lid off that delusion. Its a remarkably honest attempt to offer a massive answer to what its authors see as an epochal problem.

Yet its virtue is also its undoing. The Green New Dealers may want to spend trillions on a climate moonshot and trillions more on their other policy hobbyhorses . Most people dont even want to spend pennies, at least if its their own money. , voters in Washington rejected a carbon fee by a margin of 12 percentage points. Thats a blue state. Endorsements of the Green New Deal may have rolled in from Democratic presidential hopefuls, but the chances of them enacting any of it if they take office are about as great as Scott Pruitt being elected to the board of the Sierra Club. Even Barack Obama didnt endorse a gas tax when he had a chance to do so in 2009.

All of this means that climate activists should get wise to a central fact: If Pelosi is skeptical of their policies, where do they imagine the rest the country is? Those who believe climate change will become irreversible, uncontrollable and catastrophic in a few years should get to work on their fallout shelters. The E.P.A. wont be coming to the rescue.

By contrast, those who think climate change is a real but manageable problem would do well to say as much, too. Climate change means change, not doom. It shouldnt be hard to make the case, even to conservatives, for large scale investments in climate resilience, such as better coastal defenses. It shouldnt be hard, either, to make the case even to liberals that dynamic market economies are essential for creating the kind of wealth that makes environmental protections affordable, along with the innovations that make environmental fixes possible.

Pelosis seal clap sealed the fate of the Green New Deal. Now its time to move climate policy beyond impractical radicalism and feckless virtue signaling to something that can achieve a plausible, positive and bipartisan result.

The Times is committed to publishing to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some . And heres our email: .

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on , and .

For more infomation >> Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times - Duration: 2:34.

-------------------------------------------

Man Utd transfer target Tanguy Ndombele branded the 'new Paul Pogba' by current Lyon manager - Duration: 2:00.

 Manchester United target Tanguy Ndombele has been described as the "new Paul Pogba" by his current Lyon manager Bruno Genesio

 Ndombele has played 57 times for Lyon since arriving from Amiens in 2017, and he has made a name for himself in central midfield for the club

 The 22-year-old has risen to fame in his home land and even burst onto the international scene after making his debut for France against Iceland in November

 He came on as substitute to replace Pogba himself in that game, and has since played three mores times for Les Bleus

 Such impressive performances have attracted the attention from Man Utd and even Juventus, with the latter club highlighted by his manager as a side he could end up playing for next

 'He is strong physically and above all technically,' Genesio said, as reported by AS

 'With the first touch he manages to pass even three players, and when he starts he is difficult to stop

 'He's precise with his passing, he has a nice dribble. I do not like comparisons, but in fact Ndombele can be a new Pogba

 'Tanguy will become a top club midfielder so I would not be surprised to see him at Juve in the future

But as I am his coach, I would like to enjoy him a little more here at Lyon.'  United's next fixture is against Chelsea in the FA Cup on Monday night

 

For more infomation >> Man Utd transfer target Tanguy Ndombele branded the 'new Paul Pogba' by current Lyon manager - Duration: 2:00.

-------------------------------------------

Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times - Duration: 2:31.

Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times

Its time to reckon with the internal contradictions of climate policy.

Opinion Columnist

Is Nancy Pelosi a climate skeptic? Of course not — . But you might be excused for thinking so, given the curt wave off the House speaker delivered to the liberally ballyhooed, legislatively stillborn

The green dream, or whatever they call it, nobody knows what it is, but theyre for it, right? That was Pelosi talking about the deal as if it were a grandchilds latest video game obsession. The San Francisco Democrat is nothing if not a political realist, and that kind of realism means that no Congress is going to mobilize the country to fight climate change as if it were an alien invasion, as my colleague Farhad Manjoo .

Higher mileage standards, more subsidies for wind and solar, signing the Paris climate deal? Those are the sorts of policies Nancy Pelosi believes in, and would happily endorse if stars align under a future Democratic president.

But obtaining 100 percent of Americas power needs through renewable energy, upgrading all existing buildings in the United States to meet maximal efficiency standards, and dealing with the issue of cow flatulence by reducing meat consumption, as the Green New Deal proposes? Fuhgeddaboudit.

Then again, if climate change is a potentially humanity wrecking event, why shouldnt we treat it as an alien invasion equivalent? Lets assume and we dont have a moment to lose in substantially decarbonizing the global economy, no matter what the financial cost or political pain. In that case, isnt Pelosis incrementalist approach to climate absurdly inadequate?

Isnt it, in fact, like trying to put out a forest fire with a plant mister?

Marxists of old liked to talk about the fundamental contradictions of capitalism. Today we should also reckon with the contradictions of climate policy. Are we dealing with a problem so severe that it requires the of war socialism? Or should we think of climate change roughly the same way we think about global poverty — a serious problem we can work patiently to solve without resort to extreme measures like or depriving of the attention they deserve?

If its the former, then another windmill subsidy or carbon trading scheme wont do. We need to take extreme measures: to declare a , every citizens carbon footprint, raise taxes on the rich and middle class alike to fund trillions of dollars in green infrastructure projects worldwide, and even impose economic sanctions on China and India if they dont stop .

If the latter, however, then can we at least end the apocalyptic talk, especially since we arent prepared to take more than piecemeal steps?

So far, activists have been able to elide this contradiction, claiming both that climate change is a , and that we can deal with it relatively easily. That may do wonders for public awareness — do your part and bike to work! — but it is self deceiving, if not dishonest. Whatever else might be said of it, the Green New Deal blows the lid off that delusion. Its a remarkably honest attempt to offer a massive answer to what its authors see as an epochal problem.

Yet its virtue is also its undoing. The Green New Dealers may want to spend trillions on a climate moonshot and trillions more on their other policy hobbyhorses . Most people dont even want to spend pennies, at least if its their own money. , voters in Washington rejected a carbon fee by a margin of 12 percentage points. Thats a blue state. Endorsements of the Green New Deal may have rolled in from Democratic presidential hopefuls, but the chances of them enacting any of it if they take office are about as great as Scott Pruitt being elected to the board of the Sierra Club. Even Barack Obama didnt endorse a gas tax when he had a chance to do so in 2009.

All of this means that climate activists should get wise to a central fact: If Pelosi is skeptical of their policies, where do they imagine the rest the country is? Those who believe climate change will become irreversible, uncontrollable and catastrophic in a few years should get to work on their fallout shelters. The E.P.A. wont be coming to the rescue.

By contrast, those who think climate change is a real but manageable problem would do well to say as much, too. Climate change means change, not doom. It shouldnt be hard to make the case, even to conservatives, for large scale investments in climate resilience, such as better coastal defenses. It shouldnt be hard, either, to make the case even to liberals that dynamic market economies are essential for creating the kind of wealth that makes environmental protections affordable, along with the innovations that make environmental fixes possible.

Pelosis seal clap sealed the fate of the Green New Deal. Now its time to move climate policy beyond impractical radicalism and feckless virtue signaling to something that can achieve a plausible, positive and bipartisan result.

The Times is committed to publishing to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some . And heres our email: .

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on , and .

For more infomation >> Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times - Duration: 2:31.

-------------------------------------------

Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times - Duration: 3:04.

Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times

Its time to reckon with the internal contradictions of climate policy.

Opinion Columnist

Is Nancy Pelosi a climate skeptic? Of course not — . But you might be excused for thinking so, given the curt wave off the House speaker delivered to the liberally ballyhooed, legislatively stillborn

The green dream, or whatever they call it, nobody knows what it is, but theyre for it, right? That was Pelosi talking about the deal as if it were a grandchilds latest video game obsession. The San Francisco Democrat is nothing if not a political realist, and that kind of realism means that no Congress is going to mobilize the country to fight climate change as if it were an alien invasion, as my colleague Farhad Manjoo .

Higher mileage standards, more subsidies for wind and solar, signing the Paris climate deal? Those are the sorts of policies Nancy Pelosi believes in, and would happily endorse if stars align under a future Democratic president.

But obtaining 100 percent of Americas power needs through renewable energy, upgrading all existing buildings in the United States to meet maximal efficiency standards, and dealing with the issue of cow flatulence by reducing meat consumption, as the Green New Deal proposes? Fuhgeddaboudit.

Then again, if climate change is a potentially humanity wrecking event, why shouldnt we treat it as an alien invasion equivalent? Lets assume and we dont have a moment to lose in substantially decarbonizing the global economy, no matter what the financial cost or political pain. In that case, isnt Pelosis incrementalist approach to climate absurdly inadequate?

Isnt it, in fact, like trying to put out a forest fire with a plant mister?

Marxists of old liked to talk about the fundamental contradictions of capitalism. Today we should also reckon with the contradictions of climate policy. Are we dealing with a problem so severe that it requires the of war socialism? Or should we think of climate change roughly the same way we think about global poverty — a serious problem we can work patiently to solve without resort to extreme measures like or depriving of the attention they deserve?

If its the former, then another windmill subsidy or carbon trading scheme wont do. We need to take extreme measures: to declare a , every citizens carbon footprint, raise taxes on the rich and middle class alike to fund trillions of dollars in green infrastructure projects worldwide, and even impose economic sanctions on China and India if they dont stop .

If the latter, however, then can we at least end the apocalyptic talk, especially since we arent prepared to take more than piecemeal steps?

So far, activists have been able to elide this contradiction, claiming both that climate change is a , and that we can deal with it relatively easily. That may do wonders for public awareness — do your part and bike to work! — but it is self deceiving, if not dishonest. Whatever else might be said of it, the Green New Deal blows the lid off that delusion. Its a remarkably honest attempt to offer a massive answer to what its authors see as an epochal problem.

Yet its virtue is also its undoing. The Green New Dealers may want to spend trillions on a climate moonshot and trillions more on their other policy hobbyhorses . Most people dont even want to spend pennies, at least if its their own money. , voters in Washington rejected a carbon fee by a margin of 12 percentage points. Thats a blue state. Endorsements of the Green New Deal may have rolled in from Democratic presidential hopefuls, but the chances of them enacting any of it if they take office are about as great as Scott Pruitt being elected to the board of the Sierra Club. Even Barack Obama didnt endorse a gas tax when he had a chance to do so in 2009.

All of this means that climate activists should get wise to a central fact: If Pelosi is skeptical of their policies, where do they imagine the rest the country is? Those who believe climate change will become irreversible, uncontrollable and catastrophic in a few years should get to work on their fallout shelters. The E.P.A. wont be coming to the rescue.

By contrast, those who think climate change is a real but manageable problem would do well to say as much, too. Climate change means change, not doom. It shouldnt be hard to make the case, even to conservatives, for large scale investments in climate resilience, such as better coastal defenses. It shouldnt be hard, either, to make the case even to liberals that dynamic market economies are essential for creating the kind of wealth that makes environmental protections affordable, along with the innovations that make environmental fixes possible.

Pelosis seal clap sealed the fate of the Green New Deal. Now its time to move climate policy beyond impractical radicalism and feckless virtue signaling to something that can achieve a plausible, positive and bipartisan result.

The Times is committed to publishing to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some . And heres our email: .

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on , and .

For more infomation >> Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times - Duration: 3:04.

-------------------------------------------

Pete Davidson Called Himself 'the New Kevin Federline' Ahead of Ariana Grande Split - Live News 247 - Duration: 3:21.

 Mr. Grande? Ahead of their split, poked fun at a title he could've potentially been saddled with had he married ex-fiancée

 The Saturday Night Live star, 25, filmed an episode of 's series, : What the Fit, which was posted on Thursday, February 14

A clip from the show features the Going Places actorshow lead Hart, 39, helping an unsuspecting family out with a move

 "Oh, my God, you're engaged to ," one of the family members says while shaking Davidson's hand

 "Yes! I am!" the comedian responds. "I'm Mr. Grande. It's me! The new . How are you?"  The day winds up ending in disaster, however, as the Trainwreck actor, who is "super allergic" to dogs, has a bad reaction to the family's pooches, coughingpouring water on his head

" is having an asthma attack right in front of our face," the Night School producerwriter says in the video

 Davidson then heads outside, where a medic assists him with an oxygen mask. "Yo, Kev, I'll be in a minute," he says through laughs

"Kevin, are we still friends?"  "100 percent your friend," Hart assures him.  Ultimately, the Guy Code alum's relationship with the Grammy winner, 25, didn't go as planned either: The pop star ended their engagement after four months in October

 "They realized it happened too quicktoo early," a source told Us Weekly of the pair at the time

 Grande hinted that their union faced other issues, like her feelings for late ex-boyfriend Mac Miller, with the release of "Ghostin," which debuted on February 8 along with the rest of her Thank U, Next album

 "I know that it breaks your heart when I cry again / Over him, mmh / … Though I wish he were here instead / Don't want that living in your head / He just comes to visit me / When I'm dreaming every nowthen (And then)," she croons on the song

 A source told Us that Miller's death in September made things difficult for GrandeDavidson

"It put a tremendous amount of strain on their relationship," the source told Us at the time

 Davidson, who has been hanging out with since the 2019 Golden Globes, recently had a tattoo inspired by his ex-fiancée covered up with the word, "Cursed

"

For more infomation >> Pete Davidson Called Himself 'the New Kevin Federline' Ahead of Ariana Grande Split - Live News 247 - Duration: 3:21.

-------------------------------------------

Meet the new El Chapo – an evil billionaire ex-cop running world's worst drug cartel - Duration: 6:49.

 Just when you get one notorious drugs lord banged up, along comes one El of a murderous ­successor ready to take his place

 As Mexican cocaine king Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman begins a life sentence, America's Drugs Enforcement Administration must now hunt down an even more fearsome quarry

 A cunning billionaire former avocado grower and cock-fighting enthusiast — who was once a COP

 Nemesio Oseguera-Cervantes — aka — is so fearless he even kidnapped the millionaire playboy sons of his now caged arch-rival

 After setting up his own New Generation cartel in Jalisco state ten years ago, he made his mark in the bloodcurdling Narcos world by dumping 35 bound and tortured bodies in the streets of Mexican port Veracruz at rush hour

Read More Hatton Garden ringleader Basil 'pulled off a £1m raid five years before'    Two years later, Mencho's men raped, killed and set fire to a ten-year-old girl they mistakenly believed to be the daughter of one of their rivals

 In 2015, his assassins executed a man and his young son by detonating sticks of dynamite duct-taped to their bodies

 Chapo's partner Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada holds the title of the planet's biggest drug dealer

But it is little wonder that Oseguera-Cervantes, 52, is the DEA's most wanted, with a $10million bounty on his head

 His crystal meth, cocaine and heroin consignments not only flood the States, but they also hit the streets HERE and in Europe, Australasia, Africa and Asia too

 "He's public enemy number one," said Paul Craine, who was head of the federal DEA in Mexico during the 2016 arrest of Chapo

 "And he's got an army of thousands of bad guys." Read More How Clint Eastwood's The Mule was inspired by war veteran smuggling ton of cocaine    Chapo, 61, ran the feared Sinaloa state cartel and was immortalised in the Netflix series Narcos: Mexico

 He was caught in 2016 and finally sentenced last week.  After his arrest, rival drug dealers ­fought a vicious battle with each other to fill the power vacuum

 Chapo's sons Ivan, 37, and Guzman, 31 — kidnapped at a restaurant by Mencho's men in 2016 and freed after Chapo coughed up an estimated $2million — were muscled out of the way for partner Mayo to take charge

 But as a reclusive diabetic close to 70, his hold on the cartel is slipping.  And while he is seen as a survivor of the old school drug runners who abide by mafia-like codes, former policeman Mencho is the image of the new Mexican cartel don

Read More Mr Blobby balloon for sale on Amazon causes hilarity for very 'rude' reason    His cartel embraces social media as a way to announce their presence – carrying out narco-terrorist attacks, beheadings and the dismembering of bodies, for the world to see

 All the time Mencho stays in the shadows.  He doesn't make the kind of public challenges to ­authority that have led to the downfall of other narcos including Colombia's Pablo Escobar over the years

 And he never, ever touches a phone.  His foot soldiers keep order with assault rifles and wear a uniform of black balaclavas and T-shirts ­emblazoned with the cartel logo

 "He runs his cartel like a paramilitary," says narcos expert Daniel Solis.  "Its arsenal, and its organisation put the regular army to shame

 "With the insight he gained while in the police, Mencho knows the power of a well-structured force

 He has publicly stated he will die ­fighting rather than be taken alive. He expects the same of all his men

" Read More Terrifying moment gunfight breaks out in Irish street as residents duck for cover  Mencho rose to infamy from humble beginnings

He dropped out of school at the age of ten to work on his family's small avocado farm

 Four years later he got a job guarding a weed crop before ­sneaking into California and setting up as a small-time dealer

 He and his cousin were caught ­trafficking and he was deported in the early 1990s

 But on his return to Mexico, he ­managed to hide his criminal past and landed a job with the Jalisco state police

 He left for the Millennium Cartel, an old ally of Chapo's mob, then set up his own firm a decade ago which swiftly became known for its horrifying mass murders

 "Its method of ­killing is more akin to ISIS than the ­cartels," adds Solis. "Never ­before has how they kill, in the numbers that they kill, been seen in Mexico

"  When Mencho is cornered he ­displays his most barbaric streak. Read More El Chapo: Law agent tells of obsession that led him to stop drug lord    On May 1, 2015, the Mexican army planned to strike back at him with Operation Jalisco

 In a pre-dawn raid, elite paratroopers and federal ­police flown in by two military helicopters descended on a ranch where they believed Mencho was hiding

 But the cartel was waiting in armoured trucks.  One of the helicopters was hit, sending it crashing down in flames

Eight soldiers and a police officer were killed.  Hours later, Mencho ordered his men to set fire to dozens of hijacked cars, buses, trucks, petrol stations and banks — gridlocking traffic and bringing Jalisco to its knees

 The Mexican government was forced to send in 10,000 troops to secure the state.  Now, in the wake of Chapo's jailing, the DEA and Mexican authorities are strengthening their bid to bring Mencho down

 If he were ­captured tomorrow, US authorities would be expected to request his extradition, as they did with Chapo

 But one DEA source doubts it will get that far.  "Mencho's such a killer, I'd be surprised if he was captured alive," he said

Read More El Chapo's most daring escapes before he's locked up in Supermax 'Alcatraz' jail

For more infomation >> Meet the new El Chapo – an evil billionaire ex-cop running world's worst drug cartel - Duration: 6:49.

-------------------------------------------

Border Wall, Illinois, Colin Kaepernick Your Friday Evening Briefing The New York Times - Duration: 4:45.

Border Wall, Illinois, Colin Kaepernick Your Friday Evening Briefing The New York Times

By and

Want to get this briefing by email? Heres .

Good evening. Heres the latest.

1. President Trump declared a national emergency to try and build a border wall that Congress refused to give him.

Were going to confront the national security crisis on our southern border, and were going to do it one way or the other, he said in , above. Its an invasion, he added. We have an invasion of drugs and criminals coming into our country.

Nearly all of Mr. Trumps claims about the southern border .

House Democrats plan to introduce legislation to block the presidents move. If approved by Congress, it would put the president in the position of issuing the first veto of his presidency. .

A last minute tantrum by Mr. Trump nearly derailed a deal to avert another government shutdown and forced the Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, to accept an emergency declaration. We have .

2. The Supreme Court agreed to decide whether the Trump administration can add a question about citizenship to the next census questionnaire. .

Critics say that adding the question would undermine the accuracy of the census because both legal and unauthorized immigrants might refuse to fill out the form. About 6.5 million people might decide not to participate, according to one government estimate.

That could reduce Democratic representation when congressional districts are drawn in 2021 and affect the distribution of hundreds of billions of dollars in federal spending.

3. Amazon was long accustomed to highly deferential treatment from localities across the country. But according to dozens of interviews this week, it badly misjudged how it would be received in New York.

Thursdays abrupt announcement that the tech company was canceling a deal to build a new campus in Long Island City, Queens, capped several days of intense behind the scenes maneuvering among government officials and Amazon executives. .

New York was one of two cities chosen for new Amazon campuses. Northern Virginia is keeping Amazons 25,000 jobs, .

4. As the possibility grows of Britain leaving the E.U. with no deal, one country is seeing it as a beacon of hope: Many in Ireland believe a no deal Brexit could lead to the countrys reunification with Northern Ireland.

The sense of a slow momentum toward Irish reunification has become a fast momentum now, said an English economist based in Londonderry, Northern Ireland, where a defaced Welcome to Northern Ireland sign can be seen, above.

But lurking in the background of the debate is the between Britain and Ireland could reignite the violence that largely ended in 1998. And even still, the majority of voters in Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic would need to back reunification in a public referendum — and the British government has discretion over when to call a vote.

Separately, check out our to see what it says about where youre from. You can still play along even if you werent raised there.

5. A former warehouse employee whose relatives said he had recently lost his job stormed through his old workplace in suburban Chicago on Friday, and injuring five police officers.

The gunman, whom the authorities identified as Gary Martin, 45, was killed in an exchange of gunfire with officers.

6. The N.F.L. and Colin Kaepernick, the former San Francisco 49ers quarterback, have settled a case accusing .

Mr. Kaepernick, above center, has not played in the N.F.L. since the 2016 season, when he ignited a protest movement against racism and police brutality by taking a knee during the national anthem. He became a free agent in March 2017. As a parade of quarterbacks found work, filed a grievance asserting that the leagues owners had conspired to keep him out because of his protests.

The terms of the settlement were not disclosed. The league also settled a similar claim lodged by another player, Eric Reid, above right, who knelt alongside Kaepernick and went unsigned for a period.

7. Terminally ill federal prisoners have long had the option of applying for what is called compassionate release — at least in theory. .

An analysis of federal data by The New York Times and The Marshall Project found that 266 inmates who had applied from 2013 to 2017 had died, either after being denied or while still waiting for a decision. During the same period, the bureau approved only 6 percent of applications.

One of the provisions of the new criminal justice law signed by President Trump in December gives inmates the ability to appeal directly to the courts. Steve Cheatham, 59, seen above with his wife, did just that, filing a petition last month so that he could go home to die. He was among the first to be granted release under the new law — but he died before he could make it home.

8. First stop: Puerto Rico.

Our new 52 Places Traveler there, one and a half years after Hurricane Maria devastated the island. He knew he would see progress, but what I didnt expect to see were the omnipresent smiles, the sense of optimism shared by so many people I met, he writes. Above, crowds pour into the streets during an informal Bomba concert.

Explore the cities, countries, regions and states on this years list of .

And our previous 52 Places Traveler writes about experiencing .

9. Meg Ryan and the romantic comedy genre were synonymous from the late 1980s through the 1990s. But harsh reaction to an erotic thriller in 2003 compelled her to step into a less public, far happier life.

For the debut of about the future of romantic comedies, the burden of celebrity and leaving it all behind. The feeling with Hollywood was mutual, she said.

10. Finally, we end the week with a test of wits.

Can you name the Mars rover mission that came to an end this week, the Democrat who entered the 2020 presidential race during a snowstorm or the breed of dog who took home best in show at the Westminster Dog Show? .

Perhaps picking up one of these or is more your speed.

No matter what you do, have a great weekend.

Well be off Monday for the Presidents Day holiday. See you Tuesday.

Your Evening Briefing is posted at 6 p.m. Eastern.

And dont miss Your Morning Briefing. to get it by email in the Australian, Asian, European or American morning.

Want to catch up on past briefings? .

What did you like? What do you want to see here? Let us know at .

For more infomation >> Border Wall, Illinois, Colin Kaepernick Your Friday Evening Briefing The New York Times - Duration: 4:45.

-------------------------------------------

Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times - Duration: 2:34.

Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times

Its time to reckon with the internal contradictions of climate policy.

Opinion Columnist

Is Nancy Pelosi a climate skeptic? Of course not — . But you might be excused for thinking so, given the curt wave off the House speaker delivered to the liberally ballyhooed, legislatively stillborn

The green dream, or whatever they call it, nobody knows what it is, but theyre for it, right? That was Pelosi talking about the deal as if it were a grandchilds latest video game obsession. The San Francisco Democrat is nothing if not a political realist, and that kind of realism means that no Congress is going to mobilize the country to fight climate change as if it were an alien invasion, as my colleague Farhad Manjoo .

Higher mileage standards, more subsidies for wind and solar, signing the Paris climate deal? Those are the sorts of policies Nancy Pelosi believes in, and would happily endorse if stars align under a future Democratic president.

But obtaining 100 percent of Americas power needs through renewable energy, upgrading all existing buildings in the United States to meet maximal efficiency standards, and dealing with the issue of cow flatulence by reducing meat consumption, as the Green New Deal proposes? Fuhgeddaboudit.

Then again, if climate change is a potentially humanity wrecking event, why shouldnt we treat it as an alien invasion equivalent? Lets assume and we dont have a moment to lose in substantially decarbonizing the global economy, no matter what the financial cost or political pain. In that case, isnt Pelosis incrementalist approach to climate absurdly inadequate?

Isnt it, in fact, like trying to put out a forest fire with a plant mister?

Marxists of old liked to talk about the fundamental contradictions of capitalism. Today we should also reckon with the contradictions of climate policy. Are we dealing with a problem so severe that it requires the of war socialism? Or should we think of climate change roughly the same way we think about global poverty — a serious problem we can work patiently to solve without resort to extreme measures like or depriving of the attention they deserve?

If its the former, then another windmill subsidy or carbon trading scheme wont do. We need to take extreme measures: to declare a , every citizens carbon footprint, raise taxes on the rich and middle class alike to fund trillions of dollars in green infrastructure projects worldwide, and even impose economic sanctions on China and India if they dont stop .

If the latter, however, then can we at least end the apocalyptic talk, especially since we arent prepared to take more than piecemeal steps?

So far, activists have been able to elide this contradiction, claiming both that climate change is a , and that we can deal with it relatively easily. That may do wonders for public awareness — do your part and bike to work! — but it is self deceiving, if not dishonest. Whatever else might be said of it, the Green New Deal blows the lid off that delusion. Its a remarkably honest attempt to offer a massive answer to what its authors see as an epochal problem.

Yet its virtue is also its undoing. The Green New Dealers may want to spend trillions on a climate moonshot and trillions more on their other policy hobbyhorses . Most people dont even want to spend pennies, at least if its their own money. , voters in Washington rejected a carbon fee by a margin of 12 percentage points. Thats a blue state. Endorsements of the Green New Deal may have rolled in from Democratic presidential hopefuls, but the chances of them enacting any of it if they take office are about as great as Scott Pruitt being elected to the board of the Sierra Club. Even Barack Obama didnt endorse a gas tax when he had a chance to do so in 2009.

All of this means that climate activists should get wise to a central fact: If Pelosi is skeptical of their policies, where do they imagine the rest the country is? Those who believe climate change will become irreversible, uncontrollable and catastrophic in a few years should get to work on their fallout shelters. The E.P.A. wont be coming to the rescue.

By contrast, those who think climate change is a real but manageable problem would do well to say as much, too. Climate change means change, not doom. It shouldnt be hard to make the case, even to conservatives, for large scale investments in climate resilience, such as better coastal defenses. It shouldnt be hard, either, to make the case even to liberals that dynamic market economies are essential for creating the kind of wealth that makes environmental protections affordable, along with the innovations that make environmental fixes possible.

Pelosis seal clap sealed the fate of the Green New Deal. Now its time to move climate policy beyond impractical radicalism and feckless virtue signaling to something that can achieve a plausible, positive and bipartisan result.

The Times is committed to publishing to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some . And heres our email: .

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on , and .

For more infomation >> Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times - Duration: 2:34.

-------------------------------------------

Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times - Duration: 2:31.

Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times

Its time to reckon with the internal contradictions of climate policy.

Opinion Columnist

Is Nancy Pelosi a climate skeptic? Of course not — . But you might be excused for thinking so, given the curt wave off the House speaker delivered to the liberally ballyhooed, legislatively stillborn

The green dream, or whatever they call it, nobody knows what it is, but theyre for it, right? That was Pelosi talking about the deal as if it were a grandchilds latest video game obsession. The San Francisco Democrat is nothing if not a political realist, and that kind of realism means that no Congress is going to mobilize the country to fight climate change as if it were an alien invasion, as my colleague Farhad Manjoo .

Higher mileage standards, more subsidies for wind and solar, signing the Paris climate deal? Those are the sorts of policies Nancy Pelosi believes in, and would happily endorse if stars align under a future Democratic president.

But obtaining 100 percent of Americas power needs through renewable energy, upgrading all existing buildings in the United States to meet maximal efficiency standards, and dealing with the issue of cow flatulence by reducing meat consumption, as the Green New Deal proposes? Fuhgeddaboudit.

Then again, if climate change is a potentially humanity wrecking event, why shouldnt we treat it as an alien invasion equivalent? Lets assume and we dont have a moment to lose in substantially decarbonizing the global economy, no matter what the financial cost or political pain. In that case, isnt Pelosis incrementalist approach to climate absurdly inadequate?

Isnt it, in fact, like trying to put out a forest fire with a plant mister?

Marxists of old liked to talk about the fundamental contradictions of capitalism. Today we should also reckon with the contradictions of climate policy. Are we dealing with a problem so severe that it requires the of war socialism? Or should we think of climate change roughly the same way we think about global poverty — a serious problem we can work patiently to solve without resort to extreme measures like or depriving of the attention they deserve?

If its the former, then another windmill subsidy or carbon trading scheme wont do. We need to take extreme measures: to declare a , every citizens carbon footprint, raise taxes on the rich and middle class alike to fund trillions of dollars in green infrastructure projects worldwide, and even impose economic sanctions on China and India if they dont stop .

If the latter, however, then can we at least end the apocalyptic talk, especially since we arent prepared to take more than piecemeal steps?

So far, activists have been able to elide this contradiction, claiming both that climate change is a , and that we can deal with it relatively easily. That may do wonders for public awareness — do your part and bike to work! — but it is self deceiving, if not dishonest. Whatever else might be said of it, the Green New Deal blows the lid off that delusion. Its a remarkably honest attempt to offer a massive answer to what its authors see as an epochal problem.

Yet its virtue is also its undoing. The Green New Dealers may want to spend trillions on a climate moonshot and trillions more on their other policy hobbyhorses . Most people dont even want to spend pennies, at least if its their own money. , voters in Washington rejected a carbon fee by a margin of 12 percentage points. Thats a blue state. Endorsements of the Green New Deal may have rolled in from Democratic presidential hopefuls, but the chances of them enacting any of it if they take office are about as great as Scott Pruitt being elected to the board of the Sierra Club. Even Barack Obama didnt endorse a gas tax when he had a chance to do so in 2009.

All of this means that climate activists should get wise to a central fact: If Pelosi is skeptical of their policies, where do they imagine the rest the country is? Those who believe climate change will become irreversible, uncontrollable and catastrophic in a few years should get to work on their fallout shelters. The E.P.A. wont be coming to the rescue.

By contrast, those who think climate change is a real but manageable problem would do well to say as much, too. Climate change means change, not doom. It shouldnt be hard to make the case, even to conservatives, for large scale investments in climate resilience, such as better coastal defenses. It shouldnt be hard, either, to make the case even to liberals that dynamic market economies are essential for creating the kind of wealth that makes environmental protections affordable, along with the innovations that make environmental fixes possible.

Pelosis seal clap sealed the fate of the Green New Deal. Now its time to move climate policy beyond impractical radicalism and feckless virtue signaling to something that can achieve a plausible, positive and bipartisan result.

The Times is committed to publishing to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some . And heres our email: .

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on , and .

For more infomation >> Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times - Duration: 2:31.

-------------------------------------------

Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times - Duration: 2:37.

Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times

Its time to reckon with the internal contradictions of climate policy.

Opinion Columnist

Is Nancy Pelosi a climate skeptic? Of course not — . But you might be excused for thinking so, given the curt wave off the House speaker delivered to the liberally ballyhooed, legislatively stillborn

The green dream, or whatever they call it, nobody knows what it is, but theyre for it, right? That was Pelosi talking about the deal as if it were a grandchilds latest video game obsession. The San Francisco Democrat is nothing if not a political realist, and that kind of realism means that no Congress is going to mobilize the country to fight climate change as if it were an alien invasion, as my colleague Farhad Manjoo .

Higher mileage standards, more subsidies for wind and solar, signing the Paris climate deal? Those are the sorts of policies Nancy Pelosi believes in, and would happily endorse if stars align under a future Democratic president.

But obtaining 100 percent of Americas power needs through renewable energy, upgrading all existing buildings in the United States to meet maximal efficiency standards, and dealing with the issue of cow flatulence by reducing meat consumption, as the Green New Deal proposes? Fuhgeddaboudit.

Then again, if climate change is a potentially humanity wrecking event, why shouldnt we treat it as an alien invasion equivalent? Lets assume and we dont have a moment to lose in substantially decarbonizing the global economy, no matter what the financial cost or political pain. In that case, isnt Pelosis incrementalist approach to climate absurdly inadequate?

Isnt it, in fact, like trying to put out a forest fire with a plant mister?

Marxists of old liked to talk about the fundamental contradictions of capitalism. Today we should also reckon with the contradictions of climate policy. Are we dealing with a problem so severe that it requires the of war socialism? Or should we think of climate change roughly the same way we think about global poverty — a serious problem we can work patiently to solve without resort to extreme measures like or depriving of the attention they deserve?

If its the former, then another windmill subsidy or carbon trading scheme wont do. We need to take extreme measures: to declare a , every citizens carbon footprint, raise taxes on the rich and middle class alike to fund trillions of dollars in green infrastructure projects worldwide, and even impose economic sanctions on China and India if they dont stop .

If the latter, however, then can we at least end the apocalyptic talk, especially since we arent prepared to take more than piecemeal steps?

So far, activists have been able to elide this contradiction, claiming both that climate change is a , and that we can deal with it relatively easily. That may do wonders for public awareness — do your part and bike to work! — but it is self deceiving, if not dishonest. Whatever else might be said of it, the Green New Deal blows the lid off that delusion. Its a remarkably honest attempt to offer a massive answer to what its authors see as an epochal problem.

Yet its virtue is also its undoing. The Green New Dealers may want to spend trillions on a climate moonshot and trillions more on their other policy hobbyhorses . Most people dont even want to spend pennies, at least if its their own money. , voters in Washington rejected a carbon fee by a margin of 12 percentage points. Thats a blue state. Endorsements of the Green New Deal may have rolled in from Democratic presidential hopefuls, but the chances of them enacting any of it if they take office are about as great as Scott Pruitt being elected to the board of the Sierra Club. Even Barack Obama didnt endorse a gas tax when he had a chance to do so in 2009.

All of this means that climate activists should get wise to a central fact: If Pelosi is skeptical of their policies, where do they imagine the rest the country is? Those who believe climate change will become irreversible, uncontrollable and catastrophic in a few years should get to work on their fallout shelters. The E.P.A. wont be coming to the rescue.

By contrast, those who think climate change is a real but manageable problem would do well to say as much, too. Climate change means change, not doom. It shouldnt be hard to make the case, even to conservatives, for large scale investments in climate resilience, such as better coastal defenses. It shouldnt be hard, either, to make the case even to liberals that dynamic market economies are essential for creating the kind of wealth that makes environmental protections affordable, along with the innovations that make environmental fixes possible.

Pelosis seal clap sealed the fate of the Green New Deal. Now its time to move climate policy beyond impractical radicalism and feckless virtue signaling to something that can achieve a plausible, positive and bipartisan result.

The Times is committed to publishing to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some . And heres our email: .

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on , and .

For more infomation >> Opinion Is Nancy Pelosi a Climate Skeptic? The New York Times - Duration: 2:37.

-------------------------------------------

Border Wall, Illinois, Colin Kaepernick Your Friday Evening Briefing The New York Times - Duration: 5:15.

Border Wall, Illinois, Colin Kaepernick Your Friday Evening Briefing The New York Times

By and

Want to get this briefing by email? Heres .

Good evening. Heres the latest.

1. President Trump declared a national emergency to try and build a border wall that Congress refused to give him.

Were going to confront the national security crisis on our southern border, and were going to do it one way or the other, he said in , above. Its an invasion, he added. We have an invasion of drugs and criminals coming into our country.

Nearly all of Mr. Trumps claims about the southern border .

House Democrats plan to introduce legislation to block the presidents move. If approved by Congress, it would put the president in the position of issuing the first veto of his presidency. .

A last minute tantrum by Mr. Trump nearly derailed a deal to avert another government shutdown and forced the Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, to accept an emergency declaration. We have .

2. The Supreme Court agreed to decide whether the Trump administration can add a question about citizenship to the next census questionnaire. .

Critics say that adding the question would undermine the accuracy of the census because both legal and unauthorized immigrants might refuse to fill out the form. About 6.5 million people might decide not to participate, according to one government estimate.

That could reduce Democratic representation when congressional districts are drawn in 2021 and affect the distribution of hundreds of billions of dollars in federal spending.

3. Amazon was long accustomed to highly deferential treatment from localities across the country. But according to dozens of interviews this week, it badly misjudged how it would be received in New York.

Thursdays abrupt announcement that the tech company was canceling a deal to build a new campus in Long Island City, Queens, capped several days of intense behind the scenes maneuvering among government officials and Amazon executives. .

New York was one of two cities chosen for new Amazon campuses. Northern Virginia is keeping Amazons 25,000 jobs, .

4. As the possibility grows of Britain leaving the E.U. with no deal, one country is seeing it as a beacon of hope: Many in Ireland believe a no deal Brexit could lead to the countrys reunification with Northern Ireland.

The sense of a slow momentum toward Irish reunification has become a fast momentum now, said an English economist based in Londonderry, Northern Ireland, where a defaced Welcome to Northern Ireland sign can be seen, above.

But lurking in the background of the debate is the between Britain and Ireland could reignite the violence that largely ended in 1998. And even still, the majority of voters in Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic would need to back reunification in a public referendum — and the British government has discretion over when to call a vote.

Separately, check out our to see what it says about where youre from. You can still play along even if you werent raised there.

5. A former warehouse employee whose relatives said he had recently lost his job stormed through his old workplace in suburban Chicago on Friday, and injuring five police officers.

The gunman, whom the authorities identified as Gary Martin, 45, was killed in an exchange of gunfire with officers.

6. The N.F.L. and Colin Kaepernick, the former San Francisco 49ers quarterback, have settled a case accusing .

Mr. Kaepernick, above center, has not played in the N.F.L. since the 2016 season, when he ignited a protest movement against racism and police brutality by taking a knee during the national anthem. He became a free agent in March 2017. As a parade of quarterbacks found work, filed a grievance asserting that the leagues owners had conspired to keep him out because of his protests.

The terms of the settlement were not disclosed. The league also settled a similar claim lodged by another player, Eric Reid, above right, who knelt alongside Kaepernick and went unsigned for a period.

7. Terminally ill federal prisoners have long had the option of applying for what is called compassionate release — at least in theory. .

An analysis of federal data by The New York Times and The Marshall Project found that 266 inmates who had applied from 2013 to 2017 had died, either after being denied or while still waiting for a decision. During the same period, the bureau approved only 6 percent of applications.

One of the provisions of the new criminal justice law signed by President Trump in December gives inmates the ability to appeal directly to the courts. Steve Cheatham, 59, seen above with his wife, did just that, filing a petition last month so that he could go home to die. He was among the first to be granted release under the new law — but he died before he could make it home.

8. First stop: Puerto Rico.

Our new 52 Places Traveler there, one and a half years after Hurricane Maria devastated the island. He knew he would see progress, but what I didnt expect to see were the omnipresent smiles, the sense of optimism shared by so many people I met, he writes. Above, crowds pour into the streets during an informal Bomba concert.

Explore the cities, countries, regions and states on this years list of .

And our previous 52 Places Traveler writes about experiencing .

9. Meg Ryan and the romantic comedy genre were synonymous from the late 1980s through the 1990s. But harsh reaction to an erotic thriller in 2003 compelled her to step into a less public, far happier life.

For the debut of about the future of romantic comedies, the burden of celebrity and leaving it all behind. The feeling with Hollywood was mutual, she said.

10. Finally, we end the week with a test of wits.

Can you name the Mars rover mission that came to an end this week, the Democrat who entered the 2020 presidential race during a snowstorm or the breed of dog who took home best in show at the Westminster Dog Show? .

Perhaps picking up one of these or is more your speed.

No matter what you do, have a great weekend.

Well be off Monday for the Presidents Day holiday. See you Tuesday.

Your Evening Briefing is posted at 6 p.m. Eastern.

And dont miss Your Morning Briefing. to get it by email in the Australian, Asian, European or American morning.

Want to catch up on past briefings? .

What did you like? What do you want to see here? Let us know at .

For more infomation >> Border Wall, Illinois, Colin Kaepernick Your Friday Evening Briefing The New York Times - Duration: 5:15.

-------------------------------------------

Update | Opinion The Limp Caudillo The New York Times - Duration: 3:18.

Update | Opinion The Limp Caudillo The New York Times

How Trump and x27;s incompetent power grabs are actually weakening the imperial presidency.

Opinion Columnist

In Barack Obamas second term, with his legislative agenda dead in a Republican controlled Congress, the president turned to on an innovative scale. On climate regulation and health care he used the presidential pen to pursue policies denied him by Congress, and on immigration he made a more dramatic leap — claiming a power he himself had previously abjured, and offering a provisional legal status to about half the illegal immigrant population.

At the time I called this caesarism — an attempt to arrogate to the imperial presidency the kind of power over domestic policy that it already claims over foreign and military affairs. And because the decay of republics is an iterative process, where each faction builds on the norm breaking of its rivals, it was fairly obvious — well, to me, if not to his supporters — that Obamas caesarism helped stoke the caudillo appeal of Donald Trump, who promised a cruder version of the same impatient executive ambition.

Now, that caudillo spirit is taking legal form in Trumps most serious power grab to date: the attempt to use a national emergency declaration — a power whose chronic abuse by presidents Congress has never bestirred itself to check — to build the border fencing that the Democratic Party and his own political impotence have denied him.

On the merits, anyone who opposed Obamas moves should oppose this one as well. The scale of the policy change is smaller, but the defiance of Congress is more overt; the might be as Jell O is slightly firmer than a pudding but the bad faith involved in the emergency claim is more extreme.

And in general, serious conservatives are opposing Trump. Vox co founder Matthew Yglesias about right wing pundits who got overheated about Caesarism and caudillos in the Obama era, mentioning myself and National Review editor Rich Lowry as examples. But Lowry against the emergency declaration, and Ill happily endorse his point: If Obama was abusing his powers, then clearly so is Trump.

But in terms of the general lure of presidential rule, the general declension of republican norms into imperial habits, I also think Trumps caudillo act is substantially less dangerous than what his predecessors did.

Here I differ not only from liberals who misremember Obama as a punctilious norm respecter, but also from those conservatives fretting that Trump is for a future liberal president to impose a Green New Deal by fiat. Not that they wont be so tempted — but I just cant imagine anyone looking at the political train wreck of Trumps unilateralism and seeing a precedent worth invoking.

For presidential power to meaningfully expand, it is not enough for a president to simply make a power grab. That grab needs to unite his party ideally it would also divide the opposition , it needs to be cloaked in enough piety and deniability to find support from would be referees, it needs to appear to be politically successful, and finally it needs to be ratified by the other branches of government, if only by their inaction.

This mostly happened with the post 9/11 war powers claimed by George W. Bushs administration: There was pushback and resistance, but many Democrats went along, Bush won re election, and much of his war on terror architecture was adopted and expanded by the Obama administration.

Obamas attempt to play Caesar in domestic policy had more mixed results, since the immigration power grab was tied up by the courts until Trumps election rendered some of it a dead letter. But Obama at least persuaded Democrats and the media to go along with his caesarism, and he established precedents that a President Hillary Clinton would have undoubtedly embraced.

With Trump, though, the only clear precedent being set is one of deplorable incompetence. Hes taking unpopular action that divides his party and unites the opposition, hes doing so with a combination of brazen hypocrisy and nonsense rhetoric that makes the power grab impossible to cloak, hes guaranteeing himself an extended legal battle — and he isnt even accomplishing any obvious goal theres a reason real immigration restrictionists are against this plan except the personal one of saving a tiny bit of face.

This spectacle will not prevent some future president from abusing an emergency declaration more effectively. But the idea that Trumps grab enables future abuses more than the moves that Bush and Obama made is extremely dubious. If anything, precisely because his contempt for constitutional limits is so naked and his incompetence so stark, Trump has modestly, modestly by generating somewhat more pushback than his predecessors.

So the emergency declaration is not itself a constitutional emergency. Rather, as often in the Trump presidency, its a moment that illuminates how a more dangerous would be autocrat might someday act. Its a weird foretaste, not the main event. A warning, not a crisis. A clownish interlude in the republics decline, not the Rubicon itself.

The Times is committed to publishing to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some . And heres our email: .

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on , and , join the Facebook political discussion group, .

For more infomation >> Update | Opinion The Limp Caudillo The New York Times - Duration: 3:18.

-------------------------------------------

The new carer scheme that's giving people a new lease of life - Duration: 9:21.

Tracey McGregor is no stranger to care. For 20 years she's dedicated her life to working for the council and social services , as well as different private care centres, so when she heard about a new scheme, there was no question she wanted to give it a try

Shared Lives allows carers to open up their home and families to include a young adult or elderly person who needs care and support due to mental health problems or learning disabilities

It means it's easier for the individual to integrate into a family situation, as well as into the community

For Ethan Dobb, who was in foster care, it was perfect. Ethan was 17, and his learning difficulty, called Global Development Delay, meant he had become reliant on his social worker – who was planning to move to Spain

In foster care, Ethan needed somewhere else to go – and had just four weeks to turn it around

That's when Tracey stepped in. 'I went to go and meet Ethan in his favourite place, McDonald's !' she smiles

'That initial meeting went well, although he was very shy, then he did a tea-time visit, followed by an overnight stay, and within three weeks he'd moved in,' she explains, laughing

As Tracey and Ethan cuddle up on the sofa at home (surrounded by a few of Tracey's many dogs), it's obvious the pair share a special bond and are the best of friends

'I can't remember what it was like when I first moved in,' Ethan says, 'but I liked her cooking and she makes me laugh

' Cooking is just one of the skills Ethan has been able to develop since moving in with Tracey in 2016

He's also been learning key skills, which have not only helped to boost his confidence, but are also enabling him to reach his end goal – to live semi-independently nearer his mum, who currently lives an hour away

'I made a bacon sandwich myself this morning,' says Ethan proudly. 'And I took my bedding off and washed my sheets

I've also been helping get the vegetables ready for a big roast dinner that we're having

' 'We eat together as a family every night,' adds Tracey. And a big family it is

Also in the McGregor household is Tracey's husband Robert, their daughter Bobbie, and granddaughter Grace, who is just three years old

'Sometimes Ethan and Grace have a clash, but that's because of her age more than anything,' says Tracey

'She adores him, and sometimes Ethan is the only one she'll listen to. He's very calming, and she usually comes bounding over to him as soon as she sees him

' A key part of the scheme is making sure that Ethan has as much emotional support as he needs

After he'd been with the McGregors for a while, the Shared Lives team realised it would be beneficial to get both Robert and Bobbie trained up as support carers too, so there's always someone available to him

And Ethan is thriving. Before moving in with Tracey, he needed to have someone with him constantly

Now he goes to the shops by himself, and is undergoing travel training, so he'll be able to go to college on the train (he previously attended a Special Educational Needs School), and also travel on his own to see his mum, who he adores

'It's going well with Ethan and his mum,' explains Tracey. 'He spent Christmas Day there, and he likes to treat her

I help him arrange days out to the theatre, and he gets his glad-rags on and takes his mum on a hot date

' 'I like pantos and musicals the most,' says Ethan confidently. Ethan's quest to be more independent comes with having more responsibility and taking what Tracey describes as 'measured risks'

So, he has a mobile phone with him if he goes out, in case he gets nervous. But Tracey ensures he makes his own decisions and learns from his mistakes

'A prime example was Christmas ,' explains Tracey. 'He saw a huge white tree in a charity shop and wanted it for his room

I explained it was a nice tree, but it was two days before Christmas and he was off to his mum's for the actual festivities

We weighed up the pros and cons, but wanted it anyway. It took him a whole day to put it up and it moulted everywhere

So he quickly learnt. He makes the decisions and learns. I never say yes or no, but try to guide him in the right direction

' Ethan also contributes towards the food and utility bills, and he buys his own clothes and personal items, loving hitting the high street with his best friend

'He's very style conscious and is obsessed with his hair being right,' laughs Tracey

'When he first moved in he would just cling onto me in the shops. Now he asks where things are and tries things on,' Tracey says with pride

'I love buying DVDs and have over 300 now!' adds Ethan excitedly. Part of Ethan's day-to-day responsibilities include making his bed ('I'd never go in his room without his permission,' says Tracey), helping with the ironing, taking the bins out, and ensuring that all the vegetable peelings get put in the correct waste box

Once all the chores are done, the pair go out together to walk the dogs and have some fun

Ethan's even confident enough now to say hello to the neighbours if they bump into them

Although Ethan has joined Tracey's family life, he has introduced her to a little something he loves too – karaoke

And now she's hooked. 'There's a pub near us that dedicates the first few hours of their karaoke evenings to people with learning disabilities, and Ethan absolutely loves it,' smiles Tracey

'I get up with him and we sing Sam Smith songs together.' 'There's a disco at the pub too, and me and Tracey do our favourite routine together, which is the Birdie Dance,' says Ethan, his eyes lighting up

Another thing Ethan enjoys are holidays with the family, and last year they went to Butlins with a group of young adults with learning difficulties, they've been on a Haven holiday, and they regularly head to the seaside in the family's caravan

But Ethan has a cunning plan to get himself to America. 'Sophie is my daughter-in-law, who works for Virgin Holidays

Ethan really likes her and has had her approved as a support carer too – that's what so special about the scheme, it has to be a true shared life – but he's not silly, he's desperate to get to Disney World!' smiles Tracey

He's come such a long way already with the help and support of the family, but Tracey feels emotional as she realises one day Ethan will be brave enough to leave the nest

'It will break my heart,' says Tracey, grabbing Ethan's arm lovingly. 'Ethan is part of the family now

I know I shouldn't have that attitude, but I can't help it,' she admits. He gets assessed regularly to see how the placement is going and he agrees he isn't quite ready yet, despite being eligible for somewhere to live on the housing register

'Whatever happens we'll always be in each others lives. Or do you want to get rid of me, Ethan?' she teases

'I know everything you do is to help me,' replies Ethan sweetly. 'Sharing is caring for us and we've developed a really open relationship

If I'm poorly and our plans change, I explain it to him and he ends up becoming my carer instead

Plus, what do you say to me every night, Ethan?' asks Tracey. 'And what do I say back to you?' 'That you love me too,' he smiles

A Shared Lives carer opens up their home to someone who needs care and to gain independence

To find out more visit Sharedlivesplus.org.uk

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét