Thứ Ba, 30 tháng 5, 2017

Youtube daily so May 30 2017

Hello, my wife

Whenever I say it, it seems real right?

When did you know

that your feelings for each other is real?

I felt that it was already becoming real

when he defended me on some issues.

Then I already saw his sincerity when he started visiting me at our house to meet my family

I realized that not everybody would do that

That's where it all started

The on-screen scenes were no longer enough for me to get to know Kathryn (more)

Seriously, I want her to be my "love team" in real life

Ford

She likes it

She likes my surname, Ford

Thank you for spending my 21st birthday with me

How long have you been spending birthdays together?

With Kathryn?

Five years

uhm no

six because even before we used to celebrate together

I just want to be with her on my birthday

As long as our trip (to Japan) together pushes through

I will already be very happy

I am very lucky because DJ's family (his mom and siblings) are easy to get along with

I feel happy whenever I see Kathryn and my siblings spend time together

When I saw her post? Of course I felt happy

It took time for DJ to earn the trust of my sisters, mama and especially papa

He earned their trust over the last five years

It's a happy feeling when the person you love is very vocal about his feelings

It means a lot for me

(Our plans) In the next six years

I hope we're able to travel

and we have a steady/stable life

I truly feel his love that's why I'm very happy and blessed

I think (instead of being desperate)

I'm more of persistent/determined when it comes to love

Dj never lets me feel desperate for (affection)

because he drowns me with love

Does forever exist (between you and Kath?

Yes. Forever exists

There is

Forever exists guys

don't be "bitter" about it

Do you celebrate monthsaries?

Not anymore

Kathryn and I celebrate anniversaries

For more infomation >> KathNiel | I love you so - Duration: 3:40.

-------------------------------------------

München unterwegs: So funktionieren die Ampeln im ÖPNV (Folge 2/2017) - Duration: 10:43.

For more infomation >> München unterwegs: So funktionieren die Ampeln im ÖPNV (Folge 2/2017) - Duration: 10:43.

-------------------------------------------

Review movie Wonder Woman (so hot)!! - Duration: 6:31.

Review movie Wonder Woman (so hot)!!

For more infomation >> Review movie Wonder Woman (so hot)!! - Duration: 6:31.

-------------------------------------------

Kim So Hyun - Yoo Seung Ho : Promosi Kdrama Ruler Master Of The Mask - Duration: 0:46.

For more infomation >> Kim So Hyun - Yoo Seung Ho : Promosi Kdrama Ruler Master Of The Mask - Duration: 0:46.

-------------------------------------------

SiS樂印姊妹 So Fa Mi Re Do cover by Emily & Giann - Duration: 2:51.

For more infomation >> SiS樂印姊妹 So Fa Mi Re Do cover by Emily & Giann - Duration: 2:51.

-------------------------------------------

So, we played two man hide and seek. || ひとりかくれんぼ - Duration: 23:55.

x Subtitles will appear later in the video! x

IM SORRY

*RIIIIIIIIIIIPPP*

Something spoopy happened so we booked it and blew out all the candles

McKayla: Okay guys,

So, it's legit a minute til' 3AM. *2:59 AM*

We're getting ready.

Felicity: "Felicity and McKayla are the first it."

Three times.

McKayla: This is going to be interesting.

Felicity: Go

*3AM*

Both: One, Two, Three

Felicity and McKayla is the first it. (3x)

McKayla: So you see guys, it's in there.

And now we have to go to our hiding spot,

turn off all the lights

Okay guys, it's dark

Now what do we say?

Felicity: Close our eyes and count to ten.

McKayla: Okay

Ready?

Close our eyes.

Both: 1, 2, 3-

1, 2, 3, 4, 5,

6, 7, 8, 9, 10.

Felicity: Okay, come on

McKayla: I saw a flashing light.

And now we have to stab it.

Wait, Feli

I'm stuck

*water from drenched doll* ;")

Felicity: Okay, 1, 2, 3-

Both: Crimson is it.

*stabs with pen*

McKayla: Put it back in

Both: Crimson you are it. (3x)

McKayla: We have to ruN

*3:38 AM*

McKayla: Guys, we're going to have to end the game right now.

'Cause I'm seeing some sh*t

It's not good-

*weeping?? not coming from us.*

*tap*

*opening shower curtain*

;")

*Knocking in the background*

:"vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

Felicity: Say three times, "I win."

Both: I win, I win, I win.

Felicity: Turn on the light

For more infomation >> So, we played two man hide and seek. || ひとりかくれんぼ - Duration: 23:55.

-------------------------------------------

Agust D - so far away ft. Suran [Cover Teaser] - Duration: 1:21.

It really sucks, not having anything I want to do

I know that it seems pathetic to not have a dream like everyone else

"If you just do as you're told, if you go to college, everything will be alright"

I'm an idiot for believing those words

I just can't die, so I'm alive

Pass me a drink

I want to get drunk today, so please don't stop me

Anything is okay

Although it might be a luxury for the losers without a job to drink

I can't stand not being drunk

Everything is changing, but why am I the only one here?

Why is it that I'm the only one here while everything is changing?

So far away

Dream

永远

For more infomation >> Agust D - so far away ft. Suran [Cover Teaser] - Duration: 1:21.

-------------------------------------------

SO BAD MY GIRL - SIKBOi x DẾ CHOẮT x DƯƠNG CHU [ OFFICIAL MV ] - Duration: 3:16.

For more infomation >> SO BAD MY GIRL - SIKBOi x DẾ CHOẮT x DƯƠNG CHU [ OFFICIAL MV ] - Duration: 3:16.

-------------------------------------------

Why Hufflepuff So Undervalued? - Duration: 4:16.

For more infomation >> Why Hufflepuff So Undervalued? - Duration: 4:16.

-------------------------------------------

Why Do We Hate Losing So Much? - Duration: 5:22.

Have you ever heard those ads from mattress companies that offer to refund your money

if you don't like your bed,

even after you've slept on it for a few months?

Seems like kind of a bad deal for the mattress company, right?

All those extra shipping costs and mangy used mattresses?

What are they gonna do with those? It's gross.

Well, the thing is: mattress companies know a little something about how humans think.

Once you get a mattress into your home and feel like you own it, it's harder to get rid of.

People often shift their preferences in irrational ways like this, which can be explained by

prospect theory—

"prospect," here, meaning a future event that's uncertain.

The try-it-at-home mattress strategy is a part of prospect theory called the endowment effect.

The idea here is that if you're endowed with—or just given—something,

you usually want to keep it.

For instance, in one set of experiments, people were asked how much they would be willing

to pay to buy a coffee mug.

Other people were just given the mug and asked how much money they would sell it for.

The sellers wanted around three to four dollars more than the buyers wanted to pay—

and it wasn't like they needed a mug more.

The options are basically the same: mug or money.

But the amount of money that it takes to feel like an even trade shifts,

depending on what you have to start.

Just feeling like an object is yours seems to make you value it more,

even though there's no rational reason why it would be worth more.

Beyond buying mugs and mattresses, prospect theory can also explain some irrational decisions

where stakes are much higher—

so-called risky choices.

Like, imagine that 600 people are at risk of dying from a dangerous disease and you are in charge.

Have fun!

Your science advisors propose two plans:

Plan A will certainly save 200 lives.

Plan B has a one-third chance of saving everybody, and a two-thirds chance of saving nobody.

If you had to face this choice multiple times, you might get stuck trying to calculate the best option.

If you pick Plan A three times, you'll save 600 people.

And if you pick Plan B three times, chances are, you'll also save 600 people with one

success and two failures.

This is called the equal expected value.

But this one time, you only get one decision.

So which do you choose: the certain choice, or the risky choice?

In lots of studies that present people with a problem worded like this—with saving lives—

most people tend to pick the sure thing: Plan A.

Now, let's say you flip the way you describe the plans so you're talking about the lives

lost instead of the lives saved.

Plan A will certainly lose 400 lives,

and Plan B has a one-third chance of losing nobody, and a two-thirds chance of losing everybody.

In this case, people prefer Plan B, the risky choice, even though it's the exact same decision.

This is called the risky choice framing effect, because the framing of these problems affects

what you decide.

And one contributing factor is called loss aversion.

It's the idea that, psychologically, we're disproportionately averse to losing things—

even when it's not logical.

We make choices as though losing something feels worse than getting that thing feels good.

Like, imagine I offer to flip a coin to decide whether you win $150, or have to pay me $100.

I'm not gonna do that, it would be a bad deal for me.

But would you take that bet?

Because lots of people don't, even though there's more potential gain than potential loss.

Loss aversion might influence the endowment effect,

and likely affects people's reasoning in that disease dilemma, too.

When a risky choice is framed as saving lives, it looks like a choice between a sure win

of saving lives and a gamble.

The gamble looks worse because it points out people who might die.

When things are framed as losing lives, it looks like a choice between surely killing

people and gambling to save some.

The gamble points out people who might live.

Put it this way, and the choice that's framed as saving lives feels better!

A supposedly superficial wording change makes people more likely to make a riskier choice,

even though the plans in both scenarios are mathematically identical.

All because we seem to really hate losing.

There's some evidence that this framing effect is related to a brain region called the amygdala,

which is usually active when you have an heightened emotional reaction.

A 2010 fMRI study suggests that amygdala activity is related to people's choices in both frames:

picking the safe options for gains, and the risky options for losses.

So for something like the disease problem, it's as though the amygdala reacts to the

emotional gut-punch of that potential loss and death.

So you're driven to whatever's framed more positively, even though it's not a logical choice.

Basically, humans aren't robots!

Our decisions are influenced by feelings and not just math.

But knowing about prospect theory might let you act a little more rationally.

So if that mattress you're trying out sucks, return it.

Don't get too attached!

Thanks for watching this episode of SciShow Psych, which exists only because of our patrons on Patreon!

Patreon.com is a crowdfunding site where you can support your favorite kinds of content,

and make it available to everyone who wants it.

Our SciShow patrons chose SciShow Psych as our latest big project,

and we couldn't have made this channel without our patrons.

Thank you so much—great decision! It's been fun.

If you would like to support SciShow and help us make future projects, you can go to patreon.com/scishow.

And if you just want to keep learning about brain things, go to youtube.com/scishowpsych and subscribe.

For more infomation >> Why Do We Hate Losing So Much? - Duration: 5:22.

-------------------------------------------

Bald 1 Jahr Ehe: So wird Silas & Samuels Hochzeitstag! - Duration: 1:32.

For more infomation >> Bald 1 Jahr Ehe: So wird Silas & Samuels Hochzeitstag! - Duration: 1:32.

-------------------------------------------

Worst WWE Segment Of The Year So Far? WWE Stars Return! | WWE Raw, May 29, 2017 Review - Duration: 5:55.

Will Kurt Angle get impeached?

The Revival return to WWE TV!

And did we just see the worst segment of the year so far?

I'm Oli Davis, and this is the 29th May 2017 edition of Monday Night Raw...in about

4 minutes.

Dean Ambrose & Hardy Boyz beat Miz & Sheamaro After hyping his non-Extreme Rules Extreme

Rules match against Dean Ambrose this Sunday, Miz welcomed Sheamus and Cesaro to Miz TV.

All three men ran down Ambrose and the Hardy Boyz until the Lunatic Fringe himself came

down to interrupt.

Where is this going?

There's only one of you, Dean, and three of them.

You'd need two more wrestlers on your side to even the odds, preferably ones that really

don't like Sheamus and Cesaro.

I can't see how you're getting out of this one!

Yes, Raw opened with yet another obvious in-ring promo set up for a tag match, playas.

The Hardys won as they have done since they returned at Wrestlemania, which would usually

hint they're losing on Sunday.

Corey Graves and Kurt Angle Seemingly bored by Raw's formulaic opening,

Corey Graves did something not at all formulaic: he got up and left the announcer's table

during Michael Cole's link.

He needed to show Kurt Angle a text message, which could apparently ruin the Raw General

Manager.

The mystery is a welcome and intriguing change from Raw's autopilot storylines.

Which means it'll probably get dropped next week and we'll never hear about it again.

Elias Samson beat Zac Evans The Drifter's opening song didn't get

nearly as much heat here as it did in his debut match last week.

Yet despite the crowd's indifference, Samson had another solid showing, dominating Evans

in a smartly booked squash match.

Samoa Joe beat Finn Balor & Bray Wyatt Bray Wyatt, Finn Balor and Samoa Joe had a

really good three way, with Bray and Joe teaming up against Balor for the majority.

Joe got the win, stealing the pin after Balor hit the Coup De Grace on Wyatt.

The match told the story that even if you hit your finisher, in this weekend's 5-way,

anyone could steal the victory.

Rich Swann beat Noam Dar Rich Swann beat Noam Dar in a three minute

match that was more to do with Sasha Banks vs Alicia Fox - a feud entirely based on Alicia

botching a finish three weeks ago.

The Raw women's division, everybody!

Who Beat Up Enzo Amore?

For the second time in a row, Enzo Amore was found knocked out cold backstage.

Is it the Revival?

Generic WWE Interviewer No. 3 pointed out they were backstage last week.

Is it Big Cass?

He seems oddly heelish walking around accusing people.

Or, my pick, Vanguard 1, controlled by Broken Matt Hardy's suppressed alter ego, his subconscious

let loose when he sleeps...yeah, it's probably Big Cass, actually.

Titus O'Neil beat Kalisto To prove the Titus Brand can help you succeed,

O'Neil beat the man his protegee Apollo Crews lost to last week...by hooking the tights.

Bayley...This Is Your Life Alexa Bliss' Bayley...This Is Your Life

segment was based on solid foundations.

Mankind's This Is Your Life segment for The Rock is the highest rated segment ever

on Raw.

The viewership figures aren't in yet, but I'm going to take a speculative punt and

say the new one won't replace it.

This was quite probably the worst WWE segment of 2017 so far.

Bliss ran through Bayley's life with her old yearbook, toy dolls, high school teacher,

former best friend and ex-boyfriend.

And despite going seemingly forever, not one joke landed.

Which is impressive if only from the laws of probability.

The real sad part, though, was the missed potential.

Two components for a potentially great go-home segment were there: Alexa's high school

bully character and Bayley's supposed ex-boyfriend.

Cut the lame jokes and fake trophy props and make the skit build to Alexa snogging the

Captain of the Football Team that Bayley always had a crush on at school.

Not being able to take the humiliation any more, Bayley finally runs down and takes out

Bliss with the kendo stick, looks at the jock she once idolised - who tries it on with her

to get out of the situation - and hits him with the kendo stick too.

Bayley looks badass, Bliss looks like a nasty bully who deserves her comeuppance, and I

suddenly actually want to see them fight each other with a kendo stick this Sunday.

Austin Aries & Jack Gallagher beat Neville & TJP

The Cruiserweights got a whole 10 minutes!

Which normally would be great, but it was yet another combination of Aries, Gallagher,

Neville and TJP.

They had a pretty good match, with Neville tapping to Austin's Last Chancery heading

into their Submission match on Sunday.

Goldust and R-Truth Following their emotionally devastating split,

Goldust and R-Truth got duelling pre-taped promos.

This was some great hype work, with both men talking to the camera, the heel coming off

as unlikeable and the babyface quoting Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction like a badass.

Roman Reigns beat Seth Rollins Seth Rollins took on Roman Reigns in a very

good main event, which the Big Dawg won after a neat finishing sequence ended with a single

spear.

So that was this week's Raw in about four minutes.

Here's the usual ratings recap, from top to bottom - In Awe, Cor, AVRAWGE, Poor and

Bore.

I'll reveal my rating very shortly, but first, vote in the poll above my head to give

yours.

I'll announce the results in tomorrow's WrestleTalk News.

WWE continue their streak of consistently uninspiring go-home episodes that do nothing

to make me want to buy the pay-per-view.

That's the trappings of the Network era.

While I did enjoy the two mystery angles set up and the Wyatt, Joe, Balor and Rollins/Reigns

matches, this episode will only be remembered for the awful This Is Your Life segment.

This week's Raw is Poor.

Is John Cena returning to WWE soon?

And an ex-TNA star looks to be on their way to WWE!

Find out by clicking the videos to the left, press subscribe and support WrestleTalk on

Patreon.

I've been Oli Davis and that was wrestling.

For more infomation >> Worst WWE Segment Of The Year So Far? WWE Stars Return! | WWE Raw, May 29, 2017 Review - Duration: 5:55.

-------------------------------------------

Paparazzi-Erpressung: So wurde Dagis & Eugens Liebe publik! - Duration: 1:45.

For more infomation >> Paparazzi-Erpressung: So wurde Dagis & Eugens Liebe publik! - Duration: 1:45.

-------------------------------------------

War and Peace | So Far [eng sub.] - Duration: 3:00.

How beautiful.

How is it I've never seen this before?

We are all nothing, compared to this clear, blue, infinite sky.

They call me the general who doesn't like to fight.

You are Count Bezukhov now, my dear friend!

But only a fool would sacrifice good men for a bit of glory.

Good way to die, you see. Carrying the standard.

How can I know God

Does it frighten you?

Not a bit.

And now your brother's dead! He's dead!

I'm happy.

I know you would notwish me to be unhappy.

Scoundrel! I challenge you!

I accept.

Dear heart Daughter.

Come on. Take.

You never should have come.

I wronged you, Petrushka.

And I beg your forgiveness.

- Forgive me. - Of course I forgive you, Papa.

He looked at me.

Kuragin.

Bolkonsky.

And I found that I loved him, too.

It's better that we part.

Missed!

Petya!

Get out! GET OUT!

Out! Get out!

Petya, No!

Get down, sir! Get down!

Forward, lads! Hurrah!

I WILL kill you.

There's something I have to do, something terrible.

I hate you!

- Dolokhov. - Petrushka!

Oh, my friend!

Poor Moscow.

Can you forgive me?

Of course.

We won.

And I saw that one can love everything.

It really does seem like fate, doesn't it?

Yes.

As long as there is life, there is happiness.

There is a great deal

A great deal still to come.

For more infomation >> War and Peace | So Far [eng sub.] - Duration: 3:00.

-------------------------------------------

How did SOUTH KOREA become so RICH? - VisualPolitik EN - Duration: 12:20.

Today we are going to talk about South Korea, or as Kim Jong Un would call it, "the bad

Korea". You've probably heard of this country because it is where your mobile phone,

or your TV screen, or even your car was manufactured… Or perhaps because it is the place where the

most watched YouTube video of all time came from…

Yes, South Korea is a big power: not only at the cultural level but also at the economic

one. I'm sure everyone of you watching this video have at least, one product from SAMSUNG,

HYUNDAI or LG…  

South Korean companies are on fire. And this is a surprise given that in 1960, South Korea

was an extremely poor country. And no, we are not talking about relative poverty here.

Other countries like Gabon or Zimbabwe were more developed.

  Nonetheless, in just one generation, South

Koreans went from starvation to one of the most prosperous societies in the world.

  And, so now for the big question: What did

they do in South Korea to become quite so rich?

  Hold on a second though, because I know what

you are thinking if you are a regular viewer… "Ah, this is just another video where we

explain how a country got marvellously wealthy thanks to free market capitalism, right?!

RIGHT?!"  

Well, I'm sorry to disappoint you (or not). But the story of South Korea is a bit different.

Of course, compared with their neighbours to the north, South Korea is a free paradise,

but their economic model has one peculiarity that sets it apart from the rest of the world…

  So then… What are the reasons that explain

this incredible progress in South Korea? And more importantly… Why was Gangnam Style

so controversial in South Korea? Both of this questions are actually related (we promise)

and these are the questions we are going to answer in this video.

FROM THE TOP TO THE BOTTOM  

As you probably know, in 1953, the Korean peninsula was split in two halves after a

war in which over 2 million people died. At that moment we could actually say that South

Korea was the country that was in more trouble economically... The North had all the industries

and companies, while the south was agricultural and underdeveloped region.

  Schools had no desks and the most of the children

got the majority of their nutrition from powdered milk given by the US and Europe. This is why,

in 1960, after many protests, General PARK CHUN HEE organized a coup d'etat and took

power in the country. And this is how the first South Korean dictatorship started.

  For the next 27 years the country had 3 different

dictators. And all of them came to power in a violent way - by overthrowing the previous

dictator. Nonetheless, despite the political instability, these were the times when the

South Korean economic model was created.  

But hold on a minute because this economy is not as free as you might think...

  In fact, a free market is organized in a bottom

up fashion. The private businesses decide how, when and what they want to sell. Then,

the state comes in and regulates all that activity through laws.

  Well… PARK CHUN HEE´s system was the opposite.

This was a TOP-DOWN system. His policy was to meet the most important families in the

country, who controlled most of South Korea's industries. This group included the founders

of Samsung and LG.  

So essentially he put them in a room and said "Look, from now on, I will give you whatever

you need for you to grow."  

If one year you cannot pay taxes… it´s OK! I will forgive you! Do you need some grant?

Here you have it! Do you need to borrow some money from abroad? Well the government will

back your loan! Even if you cannot pay your debts, the state is going to help you!

  "If we are weak, our country will be in

jeopardy. (…)  In order for a country not to fall, it must cultivate its own strength."

--Park Chung Hee  

Nonetheless, unlike other countries like France, South Korea didn't put up any barriers to

international trade. Actually, since that very first moment, the government guaranteed

rule of law and low taxes for all businesses, regardless of where did they come from. But

not only that… Park Chun Hee gave all kinds of tax incentives for companies and individuals

to invest and save money.  

In other words, the big conglomerates like HYUNDAI or LOTTE had to compete in an open

market with other corporate juggernauts from Japan or the US. But, at the same time, they

had the help from the government.  

Since South Korea has no natural resources but a big population, those companies put

a focus on industries that required a large workforce: manufacturing.

  And this was the beginning of…

THE CHAEBOL NATION  

Imagine the life of one of the 100,000 workers employed by SAMSUNG in South Korea. He gets

up in the morning in a house built by CyT, the construction company run by the Samsung

group. While he eats breakfast, he watches the latest VisualPolitik video (or so we like

to think). He does it from his Samsung Galaxy phone. Then, he takes his RENAULT-SAMSUNG

car. Yep, you might not know that, but Renault cars are manufactured by Samsung in South

Korea… And guess where he has his car insurance! Yep, you're getting the trend here, he get's

it from SAMSUNG!  

Then after a hard day working at… (pause) yeah, you got it! Now our South Korean man

wants to get some beers with his colleagues. So he goes to the canteen at… (pause) yep,

you got it! Then, the weekend comes. And our friend wants to spend some quality time with

his wife and his children. He decides to take them to a park. Where do you think he will

go? Yeah, he goes to Samsung's very own Disney style theme park…

  In other words, if you work for Samsung, the

company is everything to you. We are talking about the biggest "CHAEBOL" in all of

South Korea.  

And now you might wonder… What exactly is a CHAEBOL? Chaebols are those big conglomerates

supported by the state. Some of them, like the already defunt DAEWOO, were started by

the administration itself. Others, like HYUNDAI, were born in the 1940s. All of them started

being family owned but, as they grew, they became public companies. And all of them have

different business lines...  

For example, LG is famous for their TVs and their mobile phones... But in South Korea,

they are also the distributors of Coca-Cola.  

In total, there are around 100 chaebols and they are the biggest asset in the South Korean

economy. Now, as I said before, the government places a red carpet under their feet… but

this doesn't mean they have a blank check.  

This is why when a CHAEBOL as big as DAEWOO went bankrupt, no one came to bail them out.

And this is is a clear incentive for this companies to be at the edge of innovation.

For instance, in 2008, SONY, the Japanese firm, wanted to create the first OLED TVs.

But this technology was not advanced enough and the screens were pretty expensive, even

priced to high for most of the luxury market. So the SONY guys put the project on hold,

and never really got back into it.  

South Korean LG had the same technology and the same problem. So what did they do? They

launched OLED mobile phones, with a smaller display. This way, they took advantage of

their assets and, what is more important, they learned how to work with this new technology.

This is why, in a very short amount of time, they found ways to produce affordable OLED

TV screens.  

But hold on a minute because there is another important part which helps explain this very

innovative culture. SOUTH KOREAN EDUCATION

  We all know it: South Korean children have

always one of the best marks in the international PISA test. The whole country stops university

entrance exams start. South Korean schools spend whatever they need to guarantee the

best education for their boys and girls.  

The flipside of the coin is that those kids have the biggest child suicide rate in the

world. In fact, all of South Korea has a problem with suicide -the country having the second

highest suicide rate, per capita, in the world.  

Since the beginning, the government has understood that CHAEBOLS would need high skilled workers.

So they designed an educational system that worked in line with the nation's companies.

This explains why South Korean children are incredible good at maths and have excellent

memorisation abilities.  

Further, their respect for authority and hierarchy is almost religious. And… this is why none

one of them want to start a company. The dream of every South Korean one is to end up working

in one of this CHAEBOLS. If they work hard, they might even become a manager and get a

house in that paradise on earth, in that famous district of Seoul with a name that will sound

familiar to you... Yep, I´m talking about the GANGNAM DISTRICT.

WHAT´S THE MEANING OF GANGNAM STYLE?  

"A human and warm girl during the day. A classy one, someone who knows how to enjoy

the freedom of a cup of coffee but when the night comes down, her hart gets warmer because

she is a girl with two faces… Hey, sexy lady, Opa is Gangnam Style".

  This is an extract from that famous song that

became so popular back in 2012. It even lead to their main singer, PSY, getting into some

trouble with the authorities due to the lyrics having "inappropriate content."

  For a society that is obsessed with the respect

for authority, PSY's aesthetics are something as radical as the hip movements from Elvis

back in the 50s...  

But the truth is that a hierarchical economy, one which relies on a few big corporations

is not a good recipe for a stable economy. In fact, South Korea, big as it is in the

manufacturing industry, lags behind in other fields such as services or finance. And since

the economy depends so much on governmental and chaebol decisions, there is almost no

space for entrepreneurs. Think about it… even if you want it, it is hard to start a

company when your competitors are supported by the government.

  But not only that! These hierarchical structures

are not as efficient as you might think. In fact, most of the CHAEBOLS have become bureaucratic

behemoths that require lots and lots of money to work. Take Samsung as an example. This

firm leads the sales on mobile phones in the entire world. However, they make almost no

profit. And that is a problem.  

Anyway, things are starting to change. A lot of South Korean youngsters have been educated

in Europe or America. And now they are coming back to their country of origin with a new,

more critical mindset, and a more entrepreneurial spirit. This new generation is creating the

roots for an start up ecosystem. But there is still a lot of work to be done…

  Anyway, whether you like it or not, we must

admit that this top-down model has been successful in South Korea. But despite all of this, there

are still some questions to be answered:  

What would happen if one day a company like Samsung collapsed? What would happen to the

country as a whole? And not only that... This marriage between politics and business has

created lots of incentives for corruption on a massive scale. But that's something

we are going to cover in a future video!

  Meanwhile, you should check out this other

video where we tell you about the rising Asian middle class!

  Also don't forget to check out RECONSIDER

MEDIA.COM, the podcast where you can hear the voice on this video that isn't mine!

  And now the question is… Do you think this

crossover between hierarchy and free market could ever work in other countries? What's

your opinion about the South Korean system? Please, leave your opinion in the comment

section below!  

And don't forget that we upload brand new videos every Monday and every Thursday so

don't forget to subscribe so you won't miss anything. If you liked this video, do

give us a thumbs up. And, as always, I'll see you next time.

For more infomation >> How did SOUTH KOREA become so RICH? - VisualPolitik EN - Duration: 12:20.

-------------------------------------------

Christian Hendricks is a foot fetish pedophile and it's TRUE, so NO DISLIKES ARE ALLOWED!!! - Duration: 3:27.

I'm not ready for a new walkthrough yet, but instead, I have an important message for you,

concerning Christian Hendricks.

This guy is an annoying pedophile with a foot fetish towards minors!

He only subscribes to little boys, I believe between 8 and 13 years old (I'm not sure about

that, though), and he asks them to do challenges centered on their bare feet!

What kind of stuff does he ask, if you wanna know?

The "Icarly challenge", "Sucky ducky challenge" and "Royal challenge" are some examples of

dares consisting of licking feet and sucking toes.

He also asks for the "Lego challege" too, since most people do it barefoot.

Be aware that such content is actually regarded as sexual by Youtube, which means if you do

these ideas of videos, Youtube can remove your video and give you Community Guidelines

strikes, and that's NOT good!

I'm repeating, Christian Hendricks is a foot fetish pedophile who will get your channels

into trouble, since he asks you to make feet videos!!

Not only this, but he was also known in the past for attempting to ask some kids to be

naked on camera, which is much worse!!!

And as a result, his previous channel got terminated because of his actions!!

The videos he uploads are shoutouts he gives to random of those kids he subscribes to;

however if you go to his "liked videos" list... you can see that the great majority of videos

you can find are barefoot videos and kids faces.

Can you see that?

Try for yourselves.

Again, this confirms that he has a sexual interest in children, irresistibly!!

So, if you have got comments from him on your videos asking you to do any feet videos for

him, please take this very seriously!

If you are subscribed to this guy, please unsubscribe from him as soon as possible and

tell your parents that a pedophile called Christian Hendricks got in contact with you

through Youtube and asked you to do feet stuff for his pervert purpose!

What he deserves, honestly, is to be reported to the police and arrested for grooming children

online!

Apart from Youtube, he's known for using Google+, Hangouts, Skype, Kik, and Snapchat in order

to increase his number of victims!!

I hope my message today can make you aware about the real intentions of this guy.

I hope he will get banned soon, just as last time.

Peace out!

For more infomation >> Christian Hendricks is a foot fetish pedophile and it's TRUE, so NO DISLIKES ARE ALLOWED!!! - Duration: 3:27.

-------------------------------------------

Citroën DS3 1.2 VTI SO CHIC Navigatie/Leer/Pdc - Duration: 0:59.

For more infomation >> Citroën DS3 1.2 VTI SO CHIC Navigatie/Leer/Pdc - Duration: 0:59.

-------------------------------------------

Citroën DS3 1.2 110 pk So Chic Automaat! - Duration: 0:59.

For more infomation >> Citroën DS3 1.2 110 pk So Chic Automaat! - Duration: 0:59.

-------------------------------------------

Citroën DS3 1.2 PureTech So Chic Airco/Getint glas/Regensensor - Duration: 1:02.

For more infomation >> Citroën DS3 1.2 PureTech So Chic Airco/Getint glas/Regensensor - Duration: 1:02.

-------------------------------------------

Ranking Jürgen Klopp's Liverpool signings so far - Duration: 6:25.

Ranking Jürgen Klopp's Liverpool signings so far

With the transfer window fast approaching, Jack Hallows looks at how each of Jürgen Klopps 2016/17 signings performed across the season. Jürgen Klopp has made a total of seven first-team signings in his time as Liverpool manager so far.

Shrewd deals for Loris Karius, Jöel Matip, Marko Grujic and Ragnar Klavan were reminiscent of the business model he adopted at Borussia Dortmund, while the German proved he is not averse to spending big by splashing £60 million on Sadio Mané and Gini Wijnaldum.

Alex Manninger was also brought in to provide extra advice and an experienced presence for both Karius and Mignolet.

Klopp's most expensive – and arguably best – signing as Liverpool manager so far. The Senegalese split opinion upon his initial signing but hit the ground running with a superb performance on opening day at the Emirates.

The winger injected some much-needed pace into the Reds starting XI and it's testament to his importance that Klopp's side struggled monumentally without him as an outlet during his AFCON absence.

Finished the season with 13 goals and seven assists from 29 appearances, earning him the Reds Player of the Season award and I very much look forward to seeing even more of him next season.

Sadio Mané – £30-35m – A+.

Started the season slowly and despite assisting goals for Adam Lallana against both Arsenal and Leicester, many fans – myself included – were left asking "what does he actually do?".

In fact, it wasn't until the Reds slump in January that Wijnaldum really came to the fore as he morphed impressively into the ultimate big game player.

Gini Wijnaldum – £25m – A.

Within an eight week period, the Dutchman scored the winner against Manchester City, the equaliser against Chelsea and contributed with goals in consecutive victories against Arsenal and Burnley.

Loris Karius – £4.7m – C

Things definitely didn't always go Karius' way during his first season in English football and while there were a handful of good performances that showed the potential Klopp sees in him, he was incredibly error prone.

Mistakes against Bournemouth and West Ham along with a major vulnerability to set pieces were the root cause of his downfall.

It is worth remembering that he fractured his hand in pre-season and with a full summer of preparations under his belt, this time round could be a much different proposition.

Signed as a backup option who himself would probably admit he wasn't expecting to get as game time as he did this season, Klavan did alright for the most part.

Ragnar Klavan – £4.2m – B-

The Estonian provided an experienced head at the back and it seemed as if the bigger the occasion, the more he was able to up his performance.

Solid showings against the likes of Everton and Man City saw him pocket two of the league's most dangerous strikers but for every 8/10 performance, there seemed to always be a 5/10 lurking around the corner.

Jöel Matip – Free Transfer – B+. Would have received an A if it weren't for his injury record. The Cameroonian was a superb signing for the Reds and it finally looks as if we've got a quality centre-back at the club.

Strong, tall, fast and composed on the ball, Matip is everything that Klopp would want in a central defender and while he was an unknown quantity when he arrived, he's quickly become a fan favourite.

Matip also provided the Reds with an extra threat at set pieces, scoring against Crystal Palace and hitting the woodwork a number of times across the season.

He will, however, have to improve his absence record next campaign after missing nine League games with injury this season.

Alex Manninger – Free Transfer -?.

Brought in presumably as an experienced head to help guide Loris Karius and Simon Mignolet in their development.

It's impossible really to rate him as it's hard to know what effect he actually had on the pair of keepers but with Mignolet's recent comments suggesting that the former Arsenal man was a big part of helping him through getting dropped and his resurgence when he returned, I like to think he did the job he was brought in for.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét