How The Globalism Con Game Leads To A �New World Order�
By Brandon Smith
When globalists speak publicly about a �new world order� they are speaking about something
very specific and rather sacred in their little cult of elitism.
It is not simply the notion that civilization shifts or changes abruptly on its own; rather,
it is their name for a directed and engineered vision � a world built according to their
rules, not a world that evolved naturally according to necessity.
There are other names for this engineered vision, including the �global economic reset,�
or the more general and innocuous term �globalism,� but the intention is the same.
The ultimate goal of the new world order as an ideology is total centralization of economic
and governmental power into the hands of a select and unaccountable bureaucracy made
up of international financiers.
This is governance according the the dictates of Plato�s Republic; a delusional fantasy
world in which benevolent philosopher kings, supposedly smarter and more objective than
the rest of us, rule from on high with scientific precision and wisdom.
It is a world where administrators become gods.
Such precision and objectivity within human systems is not possible, of course.
Human beings are far too susceptible to their own biases and personal desires to be given
totalitarian power over others.
The results will always be destruction and disaster.
Then, add to this the fact that the kinds of people who often pursue such power are
predominantly narcissistic sociopaths and psychopaths.
If a governmental structure of high-level centralization is allowed to form, it opens
a door for these mentally and spiritually broken people to play out their twisted motives
on a global stage.
It is important to remember that sociopaths are prone to fabricating all kinds of high
minded ideals to provide cover for their actions.
That is to say, they will adopt a host of seemingly noble causes to rationalize their
scramble for power, but in the end these �humanitarians� only care about imposing their will on as
many people as possible while feeding off them for as long as time allows.
There are many false promises, misrepresentations and fraudulent conceptions surrounding the
narrative of globalism.
Some of them are rather clever and subversive and are difficult to pick out in the deliberately
created fog.
The schemes involved in implementing globalism are designed to confuse the masses with crisis
until they end up ASKING for more centralization and less freedom.
Let�s examine some of the most common propaganda methods and arguments behind the push for
globalization and a �new world order��
Con #1: Globalism Is About �Free Markets�
A common pro-globalism meme is the idea that globalization is not really centralization,
but decentralization.
This plays primarily to the economic side of global governance, which in my view is
the most important because without economic centralization political centralization is
not possible.
Free markets according to Adam Smith, a pioneer of the philosophy, are supposed to provide
open paths for anyone with superior ideas and ingenuity to pursue those ideas without
interference from government or government aided institutions.
What we have today under globalism are NOT free markets.
Instead, globalism has supplied unfettered power to international corporations which
cannot exist without government charter and government financial aid.
The corporate model is completely counter to Adam Smith�s original premise of free
market trade.
Large corporations receive unfair legal protection under limited liability as well as outright
legislative protection from civil consequences (Monsanto is a perfect example of this).
They also receive immense taxpayer-funded welfare through bailouts and other sources
when they fail to manage their business responsibly.
All this while small businesses and entrepreneurs are impeded at every turn by taxation and
legal obstacles.
In terms of international trade being �free trade,� this is not really the case either.
Only massive corporations supported by governments are able to exploit the advantages of international
manufacturing and labor sources in a way that ensures long term success.
Meanwhile, economic models that promote true decentralization and localism become impractical
because real competition is never allowed.
The world has not enjoyed free markets in at least a century.
What we have today is something entirely different.
Con #2: Globalism Is About A �Multipolar World�
This is a relatively new disinformation tactic that I attribute directly to the success of
the liberty movement and alternative economists.
As the public becomes more educated on the dangers of economic centralization and more
specifically the dangers of central banks, the globalists are attempting to shift the
narrative to muddy the waters.
For example, the liberty movement has railed against the existence of the Federal Reserve
and fiat dollar hegemony to the point that our information campaign has been breaking
into mainstream thought.
The problem is that globalism is not about the dollar, U.S. hegemony or the so-called
�deep state,� which in my view is a distraction from the bigger issue at hand.
The fact is, globalist institutions and central banks permeate almost every corner of the
world.
Nations like Russia and China are just as heavily tied to the IMF and the Bank for International
Settlements and international financial centers like Goldman Sachs as any Western government.
Part of the plan for the new world order, as has been openly admitted by globalists
and globalist publications, is the decline of the U.S. and the dollar system to make
way for one world financial governance through the IMF as well as the Special Drawing Rights
basket as a mechanism for the world reserve currency.
The globalists WANT a less dominant U.S. and a more involved East, while the East continues
to call for more control of the global economy by the IMF.
This concept unfortunately flies over the heads of most economists, even in the liberty
movement.
So, the great lie being promoted now is that the fall of the U.S. and the dollar is a �good
thing� because it will result in �decentralization,� a �multi-polar� world order and the �death�
of globalism.
However, what is really happening is that as the U.S. falls globalist edifices like
the IMF and the BIS rise.
We are moving from centralization to super-centralization.
Globalists have pulled a bait and switch in order to trick the liberty movement into supporting
the success of the East (which is actually also globalist controlled) and a philosophy
which basically amounts to a re-branding of the new world order as some kind of decentralized
paradise.
Con #3: Nationalism Is The Source Of War, And Globalism Will End It
If there�s one thing globalists have a love/hate relationship with, it�s humanity�s natural
tribal instincts.
On the one hand, they like tribalism because in some cases tribalism can be turned into
zealotry, and zealots are easy to exploit and manipulate.
Wars between nations (tribes) can be instigated if the tribal instinct is weighted with artificial
fears and threats.
On the other hand, tribalism lends itself to natural decentralization of societies because
tribalism in its best form is the development of many groups organized around a variety
of ideas and principles and projects.
This makes the establishment of a �one world ideology� very difficult, if not impossible.
The first inclination of human beings is to discriminate against ideas and people they
see as destructive and counter to their prosperity.
Globalists, therefore, have to convince a majority of people that the very tribalism
that has fueled our social evolution and some of the greatest ideas in history is actually
the source of our eventual doom.
Nationalism served the globalists to a point, but now they need to get rid of it entirely.
This requires considerable crisis blamed on nationalism and �populist� ideals.
Engineered war, whether kinetic or economic, is the best method to scapegoat tribalism.
Every tragedy from now on must eventually be attributed to ideas of separation and logical
discrimination against negative ideologies.
The solution of globalism will then be offered; a one world system in which all separation
is deemed �evil.�
Con #4: Globalism Is Natural And Inevitable
As mentioned earlier, globalists cannot have their �new world order� unless they can
convince the masses to ask for it.
Trying to implement such a system by force alone would end in failure, because revolution
is the natural end result of tyranny.
Therefore, the new world order has to be introduced as if it had been formed by coincidence or
by providence.
Any hint that the public is being conned into accepting global centralization would trigger
widespread resistance.
This is why globalism is always presented in the mainstream media as a natural extension
of civilization�s higher achievement.
Even though it was the dangerous interdependency of globalism that helped fuel the economic
crisis of 2008 and continues to escalate that crisis to this day, more globalism is continually
promoted as the solution to the problem.
It is spoken of with reverence in mainstream economic publications and political discussions.
It receives almost religious praise in the halls of academia.
Globalism is socioeconomic ambrosia � the food of deities.
It is the fountain of youth.
It is a new Eden.
Obviously, this adoration for globalism is nonsense.
There is no evidence whatsoever that globalism is a positive force for humanity, let alone
a natural one.
There is far more evidence that globalism is a poisonous ideology that can only ever
gain a foothold through trickery and through false flags.
We live in an era that represents an ultimate crossroads for civilization; a time of great
uncertainty.
Will we seek truth in the trials we face, and thus the ability to create our own solutions?
Or, will we take a seemingly easier road by embracing whatever solutions are handed to
us by the establishment?
Make no mistake � the globalists already have a solution prepackaged for us.
They have been acclimating and conditioning the public to accept it for decades now.
That solution will not bring what it promises.
It will not bring peace, but eternal war.
It will not bring togetherness, but isolation.
It will not bring understanding, but ignorance.
When globalists eventually try to sell us on a full-blown new world order, they will
pull out every conceivable image of heaven on Earth, but they will do this only after
creating a tangible and ever present hell.
You can read more from Brandon Smith at his site Alt-Market.com.
If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read,
visit our donations page here.
We greatly appreciate your patronage.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét