Youtube daily which Apr 25 2018

There's A New Break In The Wasserman Schultz IT Scandal Which Will Shock You

Over a year ago, Democratic Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz was part of a massive

scandal which threatened the security of the nation.

Wasserman Schultz's aide, Imran Awan, not only had unauthorized access to many government

servers, but also reportedly stole some key equipment.

Over a year later, more information is still being uncovered as to what the exact extent

of his betrayal was–and the truth will shock you.

A key aspect of the Imran Awan case has been uncovered.

The Pakistani-born IT aide of former DNC head Debbie Wasserman Schultz took a laptop with

username "RepDWS" after he was banned from the House computer network for "unauthorized

access to data,"

Awan then left the laptop unattended in a phone booth with a letter to prosecutors.

The Daily Caller reported:

On Friday, President Donald Trump tweeted: "Just heard the Campaign was sued by the

Obstructionist Democrats.

This can be good news in that we will now counter for the DNC Server that they refused

to give to the FBI, the Debbie Wasserman Schultz Servers and Documents held by the Pakistani

mystery man and Clinton Emails."

Trump appears to have accurately identified a key issue with the "Pakistani mystery

man" that comes straight from court documents.

Lawyers for Pakistani-born Imran Awan currently have a copy of the contents of a laptop with

the username RepDWS Wasserman Schultz wanted to block prosecutors

from seeing what was on it Imran's lawyers have attempted to set up

a situation where it is up to Imran whether prosecutors can see the laptop, claiming "attorney

client privilege" Other analysts say the laptop should be fair

game for review Each twist has increased the intrigue:

On Feb. 2, 2017, Imran was banned from the House computer network for making "unauthorized

access" to congressional data, according to the House inspector general

This happened not long after Wasserman Schultz was fired from the DNC after a cyber breach,

yet she refused to fire Imran or even put him on paid leave, claiming that an IT aide

didn't need to access the internet to do his job

Wasserman Schultz's refusal to fire him meant he had continued physical access to

the congressional office buildings, even though all of his other part-time employers fired

him and he knew there was an ongoing criminal investigation

On April 5, 2017, despite not being allowed to connect to the House network, he was in

possession of a laptop with the username RepDWS and left it in a phone booth, where it was

picked up by police who confiscated it because they recognized that it was left there by

a criminal suspect Let that sink in.

A Pakistani IT aide, who had just been fired by all his other employers for being a suspected

hacker, left a laptop with the username pDWS in a phone booth.

The laptop was placed next to a letter to prosecutors.

What it said is not publicly known.

The cache of documents also included copies of Awan's ID (which assured that police

tied the laptop to a criminal suspect and seized it as evidence rather than returning

it as lost property) and a note that said "attorney client privilege," which put

the laptop into legal limbo.

It is unknown why the laptop was left in a phone booth as the contents of the letters

are also unknown.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz's reaction just adds further to the mystery.

Wasserman Schultz used a hearing later that month which was intended to discuss Capitol

Police's budget to threaten Police Chief Matthew R. Verderosa with "consequences"

if he didn't return what was described as a "character's equipment."

When that didn't work, she used campaign funds to hire a lawyer to keep the laptop

out of prosecutors' hands.

Do you believe this information proves Debbie Wasserman Schultz is guilty of colluding with

Imran Awan?

Leave us your thoughts in the comments section below.

For more infomation >> There's A New Break In The Wasserman Schultz IT Scandal Which Will Shock You - Duration: 14:03.

-------------------------------------------

WHICH USD AEON SKATES SHOULD I GET? - Duration: 7:04.

ola youtube my name is Ricardo lino and I'm a wheel addict today we are gonna talk

about the differences in between the different am skates this case right here

the USD am skate is a state that came out in 2016 and the main difference

between the USDA and and every other aggressive skate on the market is that

the USDA is a unibody construction what is that

well a you Nevada construction is when the frame and the shell which is the

boot is all one piece basically there's no screws holding the frame to the boot

it's just a one-piece construction and what's the main advantage of this the

main advantage is usually you would have balls right here which would be fixing

the frame to the boot but because on these frame you don't need it because

that's the unibody construction again you already know frame and boot all in

one piece instead of that they end up having two holes on the inside and those

holes are spaced for these wheels to go through that will make the frame lower

and will make you get closer to the ground so when you're skating these you

are usually closer to the ground for a lot of people they say that it gives

them more control in my opinion I like the feeling better because it feels like

I'm closer to the ground I guess that's it now they do come in three different

wheel sizes they come in 72 which is this ones right here they also come in

60 millimeters which is these ones right here and they come in 80 millimeters I

do not have any 80 millimeters but these ones are 80 millimeters they just came

out recently over here on this table I have all the models that are available

of the USDA and in 2018 basically these four models these ones right here they

came out in the end of 2017 and this is a limited edition they call it the 20

years special edition and they made these ones for some of the

skaters that scaled for USD and they were basically some legends that the

brand advocate Russia Johnson with the red skate Albert OE with the green one

Karlis piano ski from Brazil with the black one and Billy O'Neill from New

York with the white one these are the four models that we don't have here but

the main difference between these ones and the team skates is that the team

skates come with a different liner all the team skates come with a skinny boy

liner we have made a few reviews about the my feet liners and the skinny boy

was one of the liners that you already spoke about a few times so if you want

to see any video about that liner you can just go on the videos that we

already made and check them out also these ones that I just said they come

with actually with my favorite liner for the a ends which is the second skin

liner which is a little bit slimmer but on this model they even have laces on

top now I'm gonna stop talking about this and I'm gonna talk about the main

difference between the 60 the 72 and 80 and the main differences in between

these skates is obviously the wheel size obviously the 70 to have bigger wheels

and the 60s and eighties will have bigger wheels but I will then affect the

way that you skate if you have the sixties or if you have a 72 you will see

right here 72 is the frame is going to be a little bit longer it's also a

little bit taller right here you can see the frame of the 72 is a little bit

taller on the 80 millimeter skate the frame is even going to be a little bit

longer obviously you'll have a smaller age block on the 72 then you have on the

60 how will that affect the way that you skate what you should know is that when

you have a taller frame like these and with a shorter age block it's easier for

you to get will bite which means that it's easy for you to get stuck on a

Ledge or on the rail there are some guys that will skate them just like nothing

some guys like Nick Lomax will do like a frontside tort like most of us would

never be able to do on the 60s just because they are skilled and probably

girls can't even do frontside tour CDs which are eighties only very few people

would be able to do it but one thing is for sure the bigger the wheels the

smoother the roll is going to be right that's the basic thing if you have 480

millimeters you go it's going to be easier for you to roll through

everything so gonna be easy to roll downstairs it's just gonna give you a

better ride but at the same time if you want to try a topside trick even if it's

not aged block-based trick if you want to try any topside trick on the 80s is

going to be a lot harder because with the taller frame you're gonna need to

bend more and then not everyone has that skill the same if you got to do a way

out if you're gonna do a Royale let's see it here if you're gonna do a Royale

on a 60s you see the boot will touch right here but under 72 you see that the

angle is completely different and if I if I would have a 80 here I'm sure that

80 would be something like that the whole goal with this video is for you to

understand that these skates are different but they both have advantages

in conclusion 80 millimeters compared to the 60s or 72 is compared to the sixes

bigger wheels bigger wheelbase smoother better ride 60 millimeters obviously a

better grind skate a much easier grind skate still a really good roll because

it's a flat set up but you can't really compare it with a 72 or you can't even

compare it with a 80 millimeters and there's one other difference that I

can't really show you here because I don't have the eighties but on the 80

millimeters for extra support they come with a different system they do not have

this fresh but they do have a ratchet see a ratchet system which is just like

the 80 millimeters come with this type of system basically instead of having

just a strap that can get loose it doesn't let you type the skate as much

on 80 millimeters you can just crank it up and make sure that it's super tight

so now you know about the ends my main goal with this video was just to show

you some of differences between these skates if you have any doubts or if

there's anything that you want to know about any of these skates just let me

know in the comments or if there's any other state that you

would like me to review or to show you something about drop me a comment if you

like this video do not forget to give me some thumbs up if you didn't like it

give me some thumbs down and like I always say more important than anything

else just don't forget why we all started skating because it's fun cheers

guys and see you soon

For more infomation >> WHICH USD AEON SKATES SHOULD I GET? - Duration: 7:04.

-------------------------------------------

Passive Vs Active Investing, which is better? - Duration: 11:09.

So why do big investment banks say you should be happy with 10% portfolio return a year? In this video

I'm gonna go over some basics of passive investing and why as an active investor or active trader you can beat those 10%

returns a year comfortably

Hey welcome, on this channel

We talk about stocks and options

With the idea of taking a passive investor into an active trader while allowing you to maintain a full-time job

Or trade as a full-time job, so if you're new here consider subscribing and today

We're going to be talking about passive investing versus actively investing or trading

so to quickly go through some basics of the stock market the number one reason why it is so powerful is because

compounding interest

But because companion interest takes so long to play out you really have to start early to be able to see the potential of

Compounding interest as you can see here it takes 20 years to really see that

Exponential growth that you get from compounding interest

And if you put it on to thirty years or four years or even 50 years

The potential you can get from the stock market is kind of mind-boggling

Another reason to start actively investing and taking control over your finances and working towards financial goals is

The stock market is complicated, and you're gonna make mistakes and those mistakes are gonna

Cost you money, and if you wait until you've seen exponential returns already you're gonna

Have a lot more money at risk and that's gonna affect you more in the long run now to go through a few

basic passive investing strategies

I'm gonna tell my story on how I learned about the stock market

Initially and really what I saw about past

Investing that was pretty flawed and one in the end pushed me towards active investing and active trading

so the first strategy being a stock portfolio this consists of you going out yourself and

Buying 20 to 40 different stocks these stocks would then diversify your portfolio

essentially decreasing your risk

compared to if you just went out and bought one or two stocks if

One of those stocks crashed your whole portfolio would end up crashing as well and compared to having a stock portfolio

You just have a little section of your portfolio that crashes

And that's not as big of a deal as a beginner go out and buying 20 to 40 different stocks

I didn't know how to do that some of those stocks can cost a thousand dollars a share so if you wanted to

Allocate one percent of your portfolio to that certain stock and it costs a thousand dollars

Your trading account would have to be a hundred thousand dollars

This pushed me to learn about mutual funds and think of a mutual fund like a stock portfolio

But it's created through people pooling their money together if I had a thousand dollars

I could not buy twenty to forty different stocks

so then I could go and buy into a mutual fund and

I would then get the same return as that mutual fund so if that mutual fund made ten percent return over the year

I would then make ten percent return on my money that I invested as well

Then the question was which mutual fund do I buy there are thousands of different mutual funds?

And I didn't know how to gauge which ones I should buy

This led me to seeing that I should look for ones that are beating the S&P 500 index return

Which is considered to be the leading indicator of how the market is doing as a whole this let mean ascetics on

Choosing different mutual funds. This is a graph of

mutual funds versus the S&P 500

With the S&P 500 being that market indicator, and that's the red line and as you can see

the mutual funds will either beat the index or lose and get less return than the market and

So I found out that a lot of mutual funds really don't end up beating the stock market

or it's just hard to choose a mutual fund that will beat the stock market and

That can really be 50/50 chance

With the idea that mutual funds were kind of a gamble on which ones would be the stock market and which ones wouldn't I?

Actually found index funds and index funds are designed get the exact same returns as the stock market

So there are also a stock portfolio that you buy into

But there one that is matched exactly to what is in the stock market index so for the sp500

Which is on this graph if you?

Buy into the S&P 500 index fund you will be getting a portion of those 500 companies that the S&P

500 has in its index with the motto of if I can't beat the market I might as well be the market

Index funds made a lot of sense the only problem was

nixed funds and just long-term pinehold strategies

They don't make money in a downwards market and in a sideways market

To give you an example of what I mean by a sideways market

We're gonna look at the S&P 500 again

and this is a chart of more than 20 years if you were holding an index fund between the years of

around 1998 to around

2011

that's what I mean by a sideways market the market did go up and down, but your

portfolio amount would have been the exact same at the beginning of

that 1998 and at the end of that around 2011 in the

Grand scheme of things do you actually would have lost money due to inflation?

This makes it so buying hold strategies like index

Funds only make money when the market goes up

They lose some money when the market goes sideways, and they lose money when the market goes down

And this is why I believe active investing or active trading

Allows you to make money in all three of those scenarios

Another quick thing is if you're gonna

Go the bind hold strategy the stock market crashes a lot

And so if you're gonna have all your money in the index fund of the stock market

You're gonna have to realize in your lifetime of holding over the next 30 or 40 years

You're gonna have to watch your account go through swings of maybe 30 to 50 percent

And I know that I couldn't personally

Sit through my money blue using that much value over the course of a couple years

So why is a small-time investor can we look to beat those hedge funds or just beat the stock market return in general

This is because of our account size those hedge funds

Allocate tens of billions of dollars to buying one stock for us, we're allocating

Nothing compared to that and this allows us to either buy that stock or sell that stock

instantaneously without affecting the price of the market if one of those hedge funds put 30 billion dollars

Into buying a stock at one time that stock would skyrocket

And they don't want to do this because this loses them out on a lot of profits

so it'll take them months to buy up a position or

sell an old position and

because of that they miss out on a lot of gains or

Potential gains because hedge funds take so long the bias on stock

they will start buying before they really should and

So it will look something like this as it is trending down to where they want to buy it

they will have to buy at a loss and

Then as it gets to the price point that they want they will again continue to start buying it

But they will then buy as it starts going up losing out on potential gains

and

Then as the stock gets to the price point that they want to sell out

They will have to start selling earlier than they want to as well

Missing out on some of the profits

And then they will have to start selling later than they want to as well missing them out on

Locking in their profits

And so this creates their profit zone to be something like this to where they can't capture the whole move

Comparing this to us

We can buy right the bottom and sell rate the top this gives us the profit potential of that whole move

I don't want to mislead you and say you'll be able to buy right at the bottom and sell right at the top

Perfectly every time, but this is why we can beat the stock market returns and the professional hedge funds

They can't buy and sell

Instantaneously like us when we see a potential for profit

We can allocate our whole portfolio right away

And we can sell our whole portfolio as soon as we see that profit potential not there anymore these hedge funds

Have a lag time in buying and selling

Causing them to not have as much profit potential as us so the first thing I looked into on how to grow my small account

was penny stocks and penny stocks are really small value companies that trade for pennies a share and

because they trade like this they can be so volatile and

As you can see in this one it gained almost 30 percent in one day

This allows you to make the same gains on your account

But because they trade so quickly you really have to make a full-time job of trading penny stocks

And that's really not what I wanted to do while I was in school

Because I want to start actively trading while being in school or maintain a full-time job. I started looking at trading non. Penny stocks and

These stocks will still make substantial gains

But it will just be over a couple days or a couple weeks

As you can see on this stock it took a couple weeks to make a twenty percent gain

But because it took that time it would allow you to be able to trade this while having a full time job

or being a full-time student

But if you wanted to date rate you could still do that

You could either buy shares or you can buy options which would leverage your shares

And this would allow you to still get the same returns that those penny stocks would give you every day

But the beauty of this is if you started learning while having a full-time job

And then started mastering the markets and you want it to start day trading you could do that and switch

but if you started with penny stocks you would have to only day trade and

Making that switch from having a full time job to just leaping into something like that really isn't possible

Hey, thanks for watch this video subscribe if you want to start actively investing and take control over your financial future if you have any

Burn questions right now ask them in the comments below. I will get back to them and with that in mind. I'll see you soon

For more infomation >> Passive Vs Active Investing, which is better? - Duration: 11:09.

-------------------------------------------

Which Creatine Is Best? [You Might Be Surprised!] - Duration: 3:03.

Hey guys, Paul from Ultimate fat Burner.com here and in this video, I'm going to answer

the question, which creatine is the best.

If you want to find out you're going to have to stick around.

I'll be right back in just a couple of seconds, don't go anywhere!

hey!

Alright!

You're still here, awesome.

Thanks for sticking around.

So let's get right to the question, "which creatine is best?"

And it's a good question to ask, because I bet you have heard a ton of different opinions

on the topic.

However, regardless of what you might have heard, there really ins't any dispute

as to which creatine is best.

It's creatine monohydrate.

Yep.

Ok, ok, so I can hear you saying, Paul, what about creatine HCL, or creatine ethyl esther,

or buffered creatine (which also known as a

Kre-alkalyn) or creatine citrate, or this new 3-creatine blend I just saw some guru

promoting on YouTube 10 minutes ago?

Well, here's the thing...

It's entirely possible that there is a creatine that works BETTER than creatine monohydrate,

but at this time, there's no clinical evidence to support this argument.

Almost all the scientific studies that support the use and safety of creatine as a sports

performance supplement were performed on creatine monohydrate.

The other versions of creatine either have no supporting data, very little supporting

data, or the clinical data shows they are actually less effective than creatine monohydrate.

Two examples of creatine proven less effective are creatine ethyle esther and buffered creatine

(kre-alkalyn) and I'll include a link to the clinical studies that show this in the description

under this video so you can confirm this for yourself.

Here's the thing about creatine monohydrate...

It's cheap.

And it works.

And guess what?

Every time you see a new version of creatine you'll notice that is costs 3-4 times as much

money at least.

In my opinion, most of the time, claims for newer more effective versions are

just marketing, as retailers and manufacturers try to get you to switch from a product that

costs less than $10/month to one that costs $30-40 a month or more.

You can spend your money on this stuff if you like, as long as you keep in mind, that

99 times out of 100, the claims made for these products

aren't backed by much - or any - scientific studies.

Alright guys there you have it, the "no bs" answer to which creatine is best.

If you liked this video a thumbs up or a share would be awesome,

and of course, if you have questions or comments or want to share your feedback on any of the

different creation variations you have tried, please leave a comment below - I would love

to hear from you and I know our viewers will appreciate your perspective as well.

And before yoiu go one last thing... if you're not subscribed, now would be a great time

to do so, especially if you like no BS supplement videos.

Thanks so much for watching, and I'll see you really soon.

For more infomation >> Which Creatine Is Best? [You Might Be Surprised!] - Duration: 3:03.

-------------------------------------------

Fundamental Analysis vs Technical Analysis - Which Works Better? | #AskDrWealth - Duration: 5:30.

Fundamental Analysis versus Technical Analysis

This is a highly debated topic,

so which one should you use?

Hi, I'm Alvin, I'm the founder of Dr Wealth

Today I'm going to discuss with you about the differences between

Fundamental Analysis and Technical Analysis,

and also the limits to each of the approaches.

But let's first define 'Fundamental Analysis'.

For 'fundamental analysis', most of the investors use

things like financial statements,

or it can even be like economic indicators

to gather some

sensing on the value of a particular investment.

So there's this belief that

price is NOT always equivalent to the value of the investment.

Which means, if the price is BELOW the value on investment,

it becomes generally a GOOD buy for them.

So that is the primary belief or 'fundamental analysis'.

Now, let's define 'technical analysis'.

What most people understand is that

they usually derive information like

'Buy' and 'Sell' signals from the chart itself.

And the 'chart' is the representation of the stock prices movement over time.

and it can be other technical indicators such as;

derivation of price, or even

volume data.

And that's how they make certain decision on

whether a stock is going to be bought or sold.

The primary belief of technical analysis is that,

price reflects all the information that is available.

So whether there are some changes in the fundamental of the business, etc,

technical traders believe that the information has already been priced in.

So you can see there's a fundamental difference in the belief,

and that's why these two camps are very different approaches,

and they can't really agree with one another.

Let's now talk about the LIMITS of fundamental analysis.

The belief is that value is very important,

to determine the value of the business.

For example, they have to look at the financial statements and things like that.

but sometimes the information that's provided may not be 100% accurate!

So, for example even in SGX, in Singapore,

listed companies there are (in the past),

For example, PRC managed companies listed in Singapore

which are called the 'S chips',

they had many incidents of reporting FALSE numbers,

and that misled investors to think that

there's a lot of value in a company but

actually is all made up.

So when the information is false,

fundamental analysis breaks down.

It's actually acting on false information to provide certain valuation.

That is the key issue of fundamental analysis.

And the second thing is that,

when a stock is 'undervalued',

Let's say a stock is worth $2,

and the price now is $1,

so obviously, it is undervalued.

But!

If it goes to 80c, it is still undervalued,

if it goes to 60c, it is still undervalued right?

So for fundamental analysis, the other problem is:

there isn't a very precise entry and exit,

for all this positions.

It gives you a very wide range and

that makes some investors uncomfortable because

they are not sure what to do at a particular point in time.

That said, technical analysis also have their limitation

The core belief is that price reflects all information,

but that is only true, if there is enough transactions

to validate the stock prices.

For example, if is there very low volume or,

lowly transacted stocks in the market,

technical analysis doesn't really work.

Because the prices are only determined by

one or two buyers and sellers,

they are not enough to validate the prices.

The price discovery is very weak in that sense.

So which means...

then the belief breaks down,

because the price is not reflecting enough opinions of the market participants.

And the second thing is

for technical analysis, usually it's difficult

to manage large capital.

Because technical analysis usually requires

agility and nimbleness, to go in and out of the market.

Having too large a capital,

slows down as the agility

and it becomes very stressful for the trader to

want to take out or take up position.

They might end up moving the markets.

Given that on the contrary,

you can see that

the limitations of technical analysis

is actually the benefit for fundamental analysis,

and vice-versa.

I'll give you one example.

Let's say the information is false,

but there are insiders who know that a company may not be doing as well...

this may be reflected in the stock price.

They may not be trading at very good prices,

or don't have very good price trends.

And...

"precise entry and exit" that doesn't exist in fundamental analysis,

actually exists in technical analysis.

Managing large capital is difficult for technical analysis

because they need precise entry and exit.

On the other hand, for fundamental analysis, it becomes an advantage

because investors can take a long time, or a long horizon,

to add up position or get out position.

So...ladies and gentlemen,

these are the core differences and

personally if you ask me,

I'm more on the FA side,

more on the Fundamental Analysis side,

because I have found it easier to make money and...

I've also seen more successful fundamental analysis investors

then technical analysis traders.

Some of you might be thinking "why not just combine both together?"

You can do that but provided that...

that it doesn't lead you to "paralysis by over-analysis"

because sometimes you may have mixed signals,

then what do you do about them?

So, that's it for today!

I hope that you have found your edge in the market.

be it 'fundamental analysis' or 'technical analysis'.

I'll see you next time