Youtube daily which Feb 24 2018

- It's time for episode 34 of The Vyral Marketing Show.

I have two Facebook ads here.

One got 495 clicks. The other, only 38.

What was the difference?

Stay tuned.

("Feel Good (Cavego Extended Remix)")

So, welcome back to The Vyral Marketing Show.

I'm Frank Klesitz, the CEO of Vyral Marketing

and the co-founder of Vyral Marketing.

I'm also the host your show here,

where I talk about all things marketing,

and today, we're gonna talk about a Facebook ad.

But it's not even about the Facebook ad.

It's about writing a great advertisement

to get someone to respond.

I have two ads I'm gonna show you today.

One got 495 clicks over 90 days.

And one only got 38.

And the difference, I'll tell you,

is what's called long vs. short copy.

Do you write a long ad, or do you write a short ad?

And if you're not familiar, copy is short for copywriting.

And the best definition of copy, or copywriting rather,

is salesmanship in print.

It's writing persuasively to identify someone's pain,

and then to convince them

to take your offer as their solution, alright?

But, before we get into that,

I don't necessarily like talking about Facebook ads

or online marketing or Internet marketing.

We have to focus where you get results first.

And this is where every client starts at Vyral Marketing.

It's where you start here at our firm at Vyral Marketing,

is by reconnecting with and nurturing

your number one, often most neglected, business asset.

And for those of you on the show

that have been following me, you know what that is.

It's your database. It's your customers.

It's your past clients, which are centers of influence.

It's even your unconverted leads.

What are you doing to stay in touch with them?

Because your competition is.

What are you doing to stay in touch with them?

to show that you can help them, to stay top of mind,

to win the battle of their mind,

so that when they have a problem again, they call you.

And that's what we're all about here at Vyral Marketing,

is to help you reconnect with your number one,

usually often most neglected asset, which is your database,

and to help communicate with it using videos,

because that helps you attract, not chase business.

And that's the mission of our show,

where I wanna give you tips and strategies

to help you attract business, not chasing it,

and it starts with reconnecting with your database.

Now, if you wanna do that, and you wanna plan to get more

from your database and to build one to position yourself

as a trusted authority and expert

so people call you and they have a problem to solve,

go to the homepage of our website, getvyral.com.

On the homepage of our website,

you can download our Official Video Marketing Plan.

It'll walk you through exactly how to reconnect

with your database, grow it, optimize it,

communicate with it, and prioritize follow-up.

So check that out, alright?

So, let's get into the show.

I have two Facebook ads here.

One did incredibly well. One, not so much.

And the difference, I'm gonna explain to you why,

is one was more informative than the other.

And before I get into showing you these ads

and what they were for,

let me give you the backstory of this.

I was asked to write an advertisement

for an outbound prospecting company.

I've talked about them before on the show

and they have callers in the Philippines,

they'll make calls for you to identify leads.

And I had to write an ad to help advertise a service,

to generate some leads for the owner.

So, I tried to figure out what was the number one thing

people really want if you're gonna hire someone

in the Philippines, as far as making calls for you.

And I think the number one concern is how they sound,

'cause they're too much of a language barrier,

or you tell it's some foreigner

that's gonna connect with your audience, alright?

So, the offer was to click here on the ad to request a call,

to listen to call examples,

so you can actually hear live recorded call examples,

and you can hear the dialect

and hear how you speak, alright?

So, I think that's what the market really wanted.

So, I wanted to really think about

if I was gonna click on an ad

and I really wanted to know something

and there was a number one objection that came up,

what's the offer?

So, I figured it'd be call examples.

And that's probably what you've thought about, too, alright?

But here is the difference.

I had to decide, do I write like a short Facebook ad?

Or, you may have seen some longer Facebook ads

where you click "see more" and it's just this long,

giant, explanatory article.

I didn't know which way to go.

So, I don't really wanna get focused on Facebook ads here,

because this could apply to a direct mail piece,

it could apply to your emails,

as clients here at Vyral Marketing.

It could apply to the length of your videos.

The videos here I do on the show are anywhere between 15,

sometimes as long as 25 minutes,

because I wanna be informative.

I'm creating this video for you, our viewer,

who actually wants to know the answer.

I'm not trying to convince you to watch, here.

I already know you're going to watch this.

So, I wanna give you the full and complete answer.

Now, one of the things,

I'm gonna give you a couple principles

when you're designing advertising to how to, where to start.

Let me give you the first principle.

When you have to write an ad, I want you to think about

the best advertising in direct response marketing,

which is what you do, because you wanna put out advertising

and get calls and responses back.

You're not doing brand or image advertising,

or institutional advertising, where you play some commercial

to create a feeling and link your logo to it.

No one watching this, you can't afford that.

That's millions and millions of dollars, okay?

So, when you do advertising,

you wanna put a message out to the marketplace,

get them interested, and get them to respond,

and you want the responders to be educated,

motivated prospects that are actually very interested

in buying, not tire kickers,

because the expense of following up

and sorting through all the tire kickers,

because you wrote a very poor ad, is very expensive.

You only want the good leads,

not necessarily weak or bad ones, okay?

So, generally speaking, the more informative

the advertising, the better the results.

Now, I'm not the one to say that.

David Ogilvy said that.

But the more informative the advertising,

the better the results.

We're gonna come back to that here in a minute.

The second principle I want you think of

when it comes to advertising,

is if we can make the advertising so good,

that people would pay money to receive it,

that would be an incredible standard to hit.

Think about that.

If there was a very informative advertisement

that was so good that people would pay money to see it

or to receive it, I think that's a pretty good ad, isn't it?

Right? So I've tested this and I have the results, okay?

So, this is for this prospecting company.

Here's the short ad.

"Quickly scale up your home seller lead generation

"with a full-time, outbound prospector

"to cold-call homeowners likely to sell their home.

"We'll send you 30, 60 home seller leads a month,

"and your Filipino calling assistant

"will dial 700 homeowners a day, speak with 35 people,

"and send you one to two leads per day.

"Request a call to hear live examples."

Nothing wrong with that ad, and typically speaking,

this is probably how most Facebook ads you see.

Good headline, good offer, good unique selling proposition.

It explains exactly what they do.

This would certainly intrigue me,

and I might wanna click the contact button.

And if you press play on the image,

you actually see pictures of some of the callers,

so you can kinda see what their environment is,

which is pretty interesting

if you've never been to the Philippines, alright?

So, I was like okay, that was one ad,

and the client loved the ad because it was short,

and this is a High D business owner

that doesn't have much time for anything,

and wants a short ad to get to the point.

And I think for most people, you might think

"Yeah, we just want short and to the point."

Okay, well, maybe that's the case.

Let's look at ad number two. Let's pull this one up.

Oh my goodness! 15 comments, four shares, 49 reactions.

Pretty much the same ad, but let's expand this ad.

And I actually have it here on the sheet of paper.

Not only is it one page of content,

it's two full pages of content for this ad.

Look how long this is.

Two full pages of content, and I decided "You know what?

"If I saw this ad, I would have so many questions

about this, I don't even know what I would respond."

I wanna know, How much does this cost? What's the dialer?

Is this even legal? What do they say as the script?

How many calls? Why is that the call number?

Does that conversion rate hold true across all markets?

Like, my mind just starts exploding

with all these questions,

and chances are the type of prospect

that's going to spend the money on this,

their mind starts kind of wondering,

How in the world does that work? too, right?

And they may not want to click the "Contact Us" button

to be talked to some salesperson to try to

hard close them on something, that has to hit their numbers

before the end of the quarter, alright?

Well, I'm gonna let the results speak for themselves.

Let's take a look at short copy. Over 90 days.

Over 90 days, there was $665 spent on Facebook for the ad.

Alright, so not much. $665 over 90 days.

We had 38 clicks on the short, and 495 on the long copy,

which is counterintuitive that no one reads these long ads.

Everyone has short attention spans. That's not true!

It's not true. Look at the relevance score.

The relevance score is a seven for the long copy

and four for the short.

What the relevance means, it's like a bell curve.

An ad with a five is like, this is kinda averagely relevant.

It kinda angers half the people,

and maybe is interesting the other half, right?

As you can see here, seven, it's in the 70th percentile,

so 70% of people say that this ad was actually relevant.

I found this interesting.

And the more relevant the ad, the lower your cost,

because Facebook likes serving relevant ads

because it keeps people on the platform

verus just getting angry and seeing crappy advertisements

all the time, alright?

So a more relevant ad, but get this.

The cost per click was lower. $1.23 as opposed to $1.42.

But that just absolutely blows my mind,

that 495 clicks over 38.

So as you can see here...

I would go so far, I don't have the full data here,

but really what matters is how many consultations

were generated and who signed up, right?

But think about it.

Would you want a lead from a short copy ad

that basically says one or two sentences about the service,

and click here to opt in?

Or would you want a lead of somebody that read

two pages of educational information?

Let me just give you an idea.

I'm not gonna read the whole ad to you,

for time's sake, but look at this.

I literally went in here and said, I gave away the farm.

I know a lot about this business.

I know how much the callers are paid.

I know where they get the number buy.

I actually told them who to contact to buy the numbers.

I told then which dialer to use.

I told them exactly what the conversion rates are.

I told them who we use for a telemarketing attorney,

so this is legal and legit.

We shared how you manually dial

with a telephone consumer protection laws,

wireless number as opposed to using dia--

I literally gave away, I almost put like a free report

or a blog article on Facebook, okay?

Because what two standards did the long copy ad hit?

Well, the more informative the advertising,

the better the results, right?

And second, if you could make the advertising so good

that people would pay money to receive it,

the better the result.

And there you have it.

495 clicks on long copy, 38 on short.

Now, again, I wish I had the data of how many consultations,

how many signups, for full ROI of some 10,000% return,

but that's not the point.

The point is, when you're trying to influence someone,

you want to write and create an advertisement

for the person who is interested,

not for the person who is not.

Let me say that again.

When you're writing an advertisement,

you wanna write for the person who is interested,

not for the person who is not.

You see, you're headlining the ad.

"Want to quickly scale up your home seller lead generation?

"We'll hire you a full-time outbound prospector

"to call homeowners to likely sell their home."

That probably got rid of, say, 80% of the market.

Not interested in that, so they're not gonna read the rest.

Who cares?

But the headline will get the interest of the individual

saying "Yes, I am interested in that, tell me more."

And now you walk them

through some amazing, educated article,

'cause chances are, if you're watching this,

you are probably a consultant, an advisor,

an expert that has expertise you wanna share.

This is your opportunity to win trust by just explaining

how the problem is solved.

Now, what are the chances of someone reading this,

let me give you another thing that people say.

What are the chances of someone reading this

and stealing your ideas and go launching on their own?

Zero.

It is so hard to just take some article

and go build some business.

And if you're successful watching this, you agree with me.

Here at Vyral Marketing I got when I first started the firm,

with John, my business partner, like 10 years ago,

I was publishing videos of how to edit videos

and how to write emails,

literally how to do everything we do here at Vyral.

And everyone's like "Oh, doesn't everyone wanna steal

"what you're doing at Vyral?"

I'm like "Yeah, there's plenty of people doing this,

"but I wanna demonstrate my expertise to build trust

so people use us," right?

And that's what I challenge you to do.

Create advertising, think about your Facebook ads,

your YouTube ads, whatever it is you're doing,

any advertising you're doing.

How can you make it so good,

people would be willing to pay for it?

And use the principle: the more informative

I can make this advertising, the better the result.

And this applies specifically to professional services,

which is who you are, watching this, alright?

I don't know if it's necessarily the key for Nike.

They're more about branding

and linking the brand to a feeling, okay?

So, hope you learned something.

Okay? Something to think about.

When you're writing your next ad,

when you're trying to win someone over,

take as much space as you need

to fully explain how something works,

fully explain your offer,

write for the person who is interested,

not for the person who is not.

And I bet, when I look at those numbers,

whether it's an email, whether it's a video,

whether it's a direct mail piece, whatever, okay?

Infomercial on TV.

Is that, wow, your long copy may get less initial views

because it's maybe overwhelming.

The people who do watch it are interested prospects

and it's gonna make you more money, okay?

Because the leads are gonna come in,

they're gonna be highly interested, highly qualified,

and you're not gonna have to spend

a lot of time on follow-up.

The people who are not interested,

they're coming from the short copy ad.

Alright? Just something to think about.

So, that's the show for you today.

Long copy versus short copy.

I challenge you to go long

to make advertising that is very informative

and is so good people would be willing to pay for it.

If you like this show, and you wanna watch more shows,

we're up on iTunes.

You can also go on our Facebook page.

We're also on YouTube.

And on our website, go to the home page of our website,

scroll down to the bottom, you'll be able to opt in

to our VIP list where we actually email you

right when a new episode comes out,

with some other educational information I have

from time to time across all industries,

no matter what industry you are in,

because I know many of you are in real estate,

which is where our firm started.

We also have more viewers coming in from beyond real estate.

So, if you like this show and you have a question

you'd like to ask me on the show, I'd be happy to answer it.

Go to getvyral.com/ask, submit your questions

and our producer Peter will reach out to you

to see if I can answer that for you live

right here on the show.

So, thank you so much for watching,

and we'll see you in the next episode.

For more infomation >> Ep. 34 - Long vs. Short Ads - Which is better? - Duration: 16:09.

-------------------------------------------

Which Arsenal players could win them Carabao Cup final against Manch ● News Now ● #AFC - Duration: 2:24.

Graeme Le Saux believes Arsenal's two new signings will be crucial against Manchester

City in Sunday's Carabao Cup final.

They will come up against a formidable City side who are cruising towards the Premier

League title.

And Le Saux says January arrivals Henrikh Mkhitaryan and Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang will

have to raise their game.

"I don't think the Gunners will play a defensive style of game and they I think they will try

to take the game to City," he said, speaking to Betfair .

"Henrik Mkhitaryan will be a key player in this match,

because he's going to be the one that plays in between the lines and could be the catalyst

for creating precious chances for them.

"Alexandre Lacazette scored up at the Etihad but he is out through injury so it's a really

good opportunity

and stage for Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang to show his quality and importance to his new

team.

"Lacazette just hasn't seemed to have fulfilled the potential everyone hoped he would.

He came to Arsenal with pedigree, and while he's scored goals, he just hasn't featured

as much as you would have thought and he looks like he doesn't quite fit in.

"Pep Guardiola's team regularly have over 60 per cent possession in games so that shows

what their principles are -

keeping the ball, playing out from the back and just dominating teams.

"Again that's a sign of how much quality they have and how hard they are to stop."

"If you're not playing as your best as a defender you're going to get exposed

and if you're not playing your best as a creative player, the limited chances you get, you won't

take.

"Teams get very few chances against City, so if you're going to beat them you have to

take every single one that comes along.

For more infomation >> Which Arsenal players could win them Carabao Cup final against Manch ● News Now ● #AFC - Duration: 2:24.

-------------------------------------------

INDIA or SWEDEN - Which Country is Better? - Duration: 5:35.

In this episode of FTD facts

I'll be comparing the amazing European nation of Sweden with the South Asian giant

India how you guys doing my name is Leroy Kenton and welcome back to another episode and guys let me know down below in the

comments section which guns you do you think is better India or

Sweden and also if this is your first time here on FTD facts

Don't forget to hit that subscribe button and that battle

Notification if you like learning about the different countries and cultures all around our world we post videos daily

Whether you're new here or a longtime viewer. Don't forget to give this video a big thumbs up now

Let's get right into this episode. Okay starting off with India

occupying a huge chunk of South Asia the country of India consists of 29 states six union territories and the Delhi

National Capital Territory

Which includes New Delhi?

Which is India's capital with roughly 1/6 of the world's population India is the second most populous country in the world

after China and that total population is

1.35 billion people now India is a country that's doubled in size in the past 40 years

And it's expected to pass China as the world's most populated country in the next couple of decades the population

Density of India is 380 7.9. People per square kilometer and the land area is a total of 3 million

287,000

590 square kilometers now introducing Sweden Sweden is officially known as the kingdom of Sweden and by area

it's a third largest country in the European Union Sweden is one of the world's most innovative nations and

Actually, it's been called the most digitally connected

Economy and it's interesting to note that Sweden also has not

participated in any war for almost two centuries

The total population of Sweden is nine point nine eight million making it the 91st largest country in the world by population

And their population density is a total of twenty four point two people per square

Kilometers and their land area is a total of 450 thousand two hundred and ninety-five square kilometres next up

I want to look at the money and economy of these two nations of India and

Sweden the currency that India uses is the Indian rupee and one Indian rupee equals about

0.16 US dollars

Now the Swedish currency is called the Sweden Crona and one Sweden Crona equals zero point one three u.s.

Dollars now for India it has one of the largest and most diverse

economies in the entire world

But because of its enormous population it in terms of its income and gross national product the GNP per capita

It's one of the poorest countries on earth

Another GDP is a total of 2.2 six trillion dollars and their GDP per capita is six point five seven

Thousand dollars India's top exports are refined petroleum at nine point nine percent

Diamonds at nine point three percent and jewelry at four point nine percent the highest imports are crude petroleum

Which is at eighteen percent and gold which is at sixteen point six percent and diamonds at five point five percent?

So those are some financial numbers for India

And now I want to move on over to

Sweden's financial numbers so Sweden is a twenty six largest export economy in the entire world and

Sweden's economic freedom score is seventy six point three making its economy the 15th

Freest in the world students GDP is five hundred and ten billion dollars and its GDP per capita is forty-nine point two

Thousand the top experts in Sweden are cars at five point five percent

Refined petroleum at four point seven percent and package medicaments at four point one percent

Sweden's top imports are cars at six point two percent crude petroleum at four point two percent and vehicle parts at three point nine percent

Now I want to compare the living costs of India and Sweden and see which country is

cheaper or more expensive to live in now when we look at the total living costs of Sweden compared to

India we see food in Sweden is a hundred and thirty seven percent more expensive

Housing is two hundred and twenty eight percent more expensive

Clothing is at sixty seven percent more expensive

Transportation is a hundred and eighty nine percent more expensive

personal care is 91 percent higher and

Entertainment is 26 percent higher in

Sweden so overall Sweden is a hundred and thirty five percent more

Expensive than India now closing off this episode. I just want to look at two more things in national debt India's national

Debt is roughly 1.1 trillion US dollars, and the total debt per citizen is

928 dollars Sweden's national debt is

222 billion u.s.

Dollars and his debt per citizen is twenty-two thousand four hundred and ninety eight dollars so guys that concludes this side-by-side

Comparison of India and Sweden let me know all your thoughts and comments down below

I really want to hear what you guys have to say all of your input as well as any suggestions for future which is better

episodes that you want to see we have more videos about

India and

Sweden as well as other parts of the world those links are down below as well as will have a link to the playlist at

The end of this episode you can also follow me on social media those links are down below as well

Until the next time guys stay educated and stay awesome. I'll see you real soon

Hey, and you made it to the end of another episode and before you run off here are some episodes that we highly recommend you

Can keep on learning and be sure to come back here to FTD facts every single day?

We post daily episodes, and yeah, so you can brag to your friends and families, how smart you're getting by watching FTD facts episodes

I'll see you guys real soon later

For more infomation >> INDIA or SWEDEN - Which Country is Better? - Duration: 5:35.

-------------------------------------------

Russia or China? Which is America's greatest threat? - Duration: 5:08.

For more infomation >> Russia or China? Which is America's greatest threat? - Duration: 5:08.

-------------------------------------------

COPYING DIANA|Following in her footsteps: all the ways in which Meghan Markle mirrors Princess Diana - Duration: 10:05.

Please press the bell icon on YouTube app and never miss another update this is

stubborn news channel please subscribe for updates

following in her footsteps all meagan mark O'Meara's Princess Diana

as Megan Markel acclimatize --is to public life more comparisons are being

drawn between her and Prince Harry's late mother Princess Diana

royal insiders have said that the British Royals haven't been shaken up

this much since Diana nor have the public been so enraptured by someone

with so much commitment in the last 20 years

but the similarities don't end there

nearly 30 years apart both Princess Diana and Megan Markel blazed a stylish

trail within the British royal family dianna ruffled feathers in the late 80s

and early 90s with her fondness for daring shoulder bearing gasp gowns was

met with disapproval from high-ranking royal family members not to mention her

off-duty wardrobe

she was once pictured running back to her car in London wearing a Harvard

sweatshirt and gym shorts

kill horror

Dianna's former stylist and a Harvey told The Telegraph that she in the late

Princess were learning the Royal ropes together trying to cure it cutting edge

looks befitting the most talked-about woman in the world

neither of us really knew that much about royal etiquette and what was

expected of her style wise she explained

we're going to bow have to dress for tea Diana would say

and then we'd have to guess about the style of dress she should wear and find

lots of options

she very quickly jettisoned gloves

the royal family all wore them but Diana just preferred not to Megan was met with

similar objection for having the audacity to wear ripped jeans in her

first event with then-boyfriend Prince Harry in September

she has stayed true to her signature lucky looks look and keeps residents of

her new home happy by mixing British designers with an arsenal of Canadian

couturiers for her carefully choreographed public appearances in the

run-up her May wedding

and she has been shunning structured skirt suits in favor of more relaxed

attire like flared jeans or an Alexander McQueen tuxedo

only wearing a required by uniform pillbox hat for Christmas Day

celebrations with her future in-laws

infamous interview with Megan and Harry after their engagement it's clear the

couple's mutual attraction for charity work was a catalyst of compatibility

between the pair

Herry gazed adoringly as his new fiance saying she can do anything when asked

about their future intentions

both of us have passions for wanting to make change for good

with lots of young people running around the Commonwealth that's where we want to

spend most of our time he said there's a lot to do

and Megan has been living up to her word it was revealed earlier this month that

she made two secret visits to victims of the Grenfell tower fire purposely not

seeking media attention of her endeavors

dianna similarly would famously sneak out of kensington palace to visit sick

children in hospitals around london even bringing prince william when he was 12

to educate him in addition to leaving kensington palace to visit homeless

shelters in the night

during her lifetime diana became synonymous with her preferred charity

organizations including aids research in most children's charities a COS

similarly chosen by Kate Middleton

if I'm going to talk on behalf of any cause I want to go and see the problem

for myself and learn about it she told The Washington Post's Katherine Graham

about wanting to be more than just a figurehead

Diana was and Megan is acutely aware of her impact on the public

today there are an endless array of photos of Megan standing back and

genuinely funning with gratitude as she greets well-wishers around the UK

last week she surprised everyone by speaking Filipino to visitors from the

Philippines in Scotland the see overage of Markel has been

overwhelmingly positive safe for some questionable commentary in the early

days of her relationship with Harry in a recent piece by the Daily Mail

denouncing her as - huggy wuvvy for well hugging people when she meets them

in her sit-down engaged interview she addressed the CoV rich of

her race which had prompted her then-boyfriend to issue a statement

denouncing the British media's portrayal of her which she described as

disheartening

you know it's a shame that that is the climate in this world to focus that much

on that Oh our that that would be discriminatory in that sense but I think

at the end of the day I'm really just proud of Who I am and where I come from

and we have ne veut put any focus on that

we've just focused on who we are as a couple she said

Diana was just as welcoming when dealing with visitors who would take time out of

their lives to catch a glimpse of her or a handshake as they were extraordinarily

lucky

it was this seemingly effortless affability why she was dubbed the

people's princess

while Kate Middleton has to adhere to stricter guidelines in public for myriad

reasons largely because her husband will ascend the throne eventually Meghan

doesn't have the same restrictions because she's 36 because she's American

because Harry is bumped further down the line she has a lot more freedom

Diana was just 20 when she Wed Prince Charles and when dealing with the public

she had the self-assuredness of a woman twice her age

miss Harvey spoke fondly of her dealings with Diana saying everyone was always so

nervous but Diana put them at ease

she started off so shy and ended up so confident

it just shows what we can still all learn from her

fire to her engagement May rudely gave an interview with Vanity

Fair discussing her new chapter as a royal girlfriend a move which would have

been choreographed and approved by the Royal Communications Office and one

which divided critics

the decision to choose a prestige publication a respected journalist and

give enough to bits to satisfy the public's appetite proved just how adept

she is at portraying herself in a positive light a handy quality to

possess when you've become internationally recognized overnight

during her relationship with Harry some publications began to lose the run of

themselves the couple had only been together a year

in public for six months but we knew Eve everything there was to know about her

dianna on the other hand Diana was incomparable in her dealings with the

press and appeared on the sea over of British Vogue on three occasions during

the course of her lifetime

the late list till Burris who was editor of vogue at the time orchestrated to co

ver with the princess and Alexandra Shulman approved her third silver which

was to commemorate her tragic death in 1997

please subscribe our Channel stubborn news for latest news thanks for watching

you

press the bell icon on YouTube app and never miss another update

and in the end a humble request that please subscribe our channel stubborn

news for latest updates thank you

For more infomation >> COPYING DIANA|Following in her footsteps: all the ways in which Meghan Markle mirrors Princess Diana - Duration: 10:05.

-------------------------------------------

QUIZ: Which Stray Kids Member Are You? - Duration: 1:03.

For more infomation >> QUIZ: Which Stray Kids Member Are You? - Duration: 1:03.

-------------------------------------------

Obama's DACA program tied to growth of deadly MS 13 gang which h - Duration: 5:14.

Obama�s DACA program tied to growth of deadly MS-13 gang which has spread to 22 states:

End it NOW

The one reason Americans should support President Donald J. Trump�s decision to end the Deferred

Action on Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program initiated by his predecessor is that President

Obama�s executive order creating it was unconstitutional.

Of course, that�s too much to ask in today�s hyper-politicized environment; Americans who

supported Obama�s DACA program never cared whether it was constitutional or legal.

But okay, I get the politics.

How about supporting the recision of the program because it improves community safety and national

security?

Are those still �bipartisan� objectives?

As reported by the Washington Examiner, DACA recipients are part of a group of 300,000

or so illegal immigrants who are feeding the recruitment efforts of MS-13, one of the deadliest,

most dangerous gangs in the U.S.

And now its members have spread to nearly half of all states � 22 to be exact.

The gang, which was �stifled under President George W. Bush,� the news site noted, has

committed crimes � many of them horrific � in at least that many states:

Since 2012, 207 murders have been tied to the gang called �Mara Salvatrucha,� and

there are over 500 cases nationwide of MS-13 members being charged in major crimes, according

to the report from the Center for Immigration Studies.

What�s making the situation worse is that it is difficult to deport these predators

because there are so many sanctuary cities around the country whose leaders have passed

ordinances forbidding local police from cooperating with federal immigration authorities � acts

of defiance that have only grown stiffer in the age of Trump, who has pledged along with

Attorney General Jeff Sessions to crack down on these jurisdictions.

The author of the center�s study, Jessica M. Vaughan, said the crackdown and deportation

effort cannot happen quickly enough.

(Related: DACA �dreamer� wanted by police for allegedly murdering a store owner in Texas.)

In discussing how the gang managed to replenish itself and its ranks under the open-border

policies of the Obama administration, she told the Washington Examiner:

This resurgence represents a very serious threat to public safety in communities where

MS-13 has rebuilt itself.

The resurgence is directly connected to the illegal arrival and resettlement of more than

300,000 Central American youths and families that has continued unabated for six years,

and to a de-prioritization of immigration enforcement in the interior of the country

that occurred at the same time.

Researchers she supervised at the immigration reform think tank discovered that the gang�s

presence was more heavily concentrated in regions where so-called �unaccompanied alien

children� were placed under the last administration; this includes the states of Virginia, California

(of course), Maryland and New York � all blue or, in the case of the Old Dominion,

purple, states.

Which, again, proves what a disaster to public health and safety liberals are � they are

the same people who want to import dangerous gang members while working to disarm law-abiding

Americans at the same time.

Vaughan cited one example � a Maryland DACA recipient who has been charged with gang activity

and who urged friends in El Salvador to rush the U.S. border and take advantage of Obama�s

wide-open door policies:

One MS-13 clique leader in Frederick, Md., who had received a DACA work permit and was

employed as a custodian at a middle school in Frederick, Md., and who was recently incarcerated

for various gang-related crimes, reportedly was told by gang leaders in El Salvador to

take advantage of the lenient policies on UACs to bring in new recruits, knowing that

they would be allowed to resettle in the area with few questions asked.

Several of these unaccompanied minors now have been arrested and incarcerated for various

crimes, including a vicious random attack on a sheriff�s deputy in 2015.

Americans don�t see eye-to-eye on much these days, but if we can�t even agree to end

insane immigration/sanctuary city policies are leading to the death of American citizens,

then there�s no point in debating how to make our children safer at schools.

For more infomation >> Obama's DACA program tied to growth of deadly MS 13 gang which h - Duration: 5:14.

-------------------------------------------

Mangakakalot - A Place on which one of my reaction is nonsense to begin with. - Duration: 1:26.

*Just a regular day on google*

Hmm? What the-

"Get a Life"

*German Kid Intensifies*

Kid you need to really stop crying over a game.

Oh hey theres me!

Lighhhhhht Novels

or commonly known as MaNgAzuU

*Boring explanation of me explaining the definition*

And Whats Better way to start

Than a website called

MangaKakalot.com

And you know I am not surprised?

Well, its a long story

So I'll a CinemasSins Parody Called WebsiteoSins

Dramatic Intro :o

Well, that's it for today.