Thứ Tư, 2 tháng 1, 2019

Youtube daily which Jan 2 2019

year of the golden pig has dawned people in South Korea are hoping for better

luck in 2019 as pig symbolized abundance and good fortune kim hyusun tells deeper

into the meaning of the year of the golden pig pigs are seen as a symbol of

wealth and good fortune in Korea as they gave birth to many piglets during the

1970s and 80s barber shops in Korea had images of pigs on their walls hoping to

attract more customers coin banks have also long been in the shape of pigs

known to be fertile animals pigs are often associated with abundance and thus

many believe that those born in the year of the pig will live a prosperous life

the Chinese character for home is a combination of a modern character that

represents a house on the top and a character below that represents a pig

likewise people have domesticated pigs for a long time in Korea pigs were used

as sacrifice for memory of rituals for ancestors and were a precious food

source for the Korean people as 2019 is the year of the pig and it's an earth

piggy er according to the sexagenary cycle that are known as kanji that

consists of a combination of a color and an animal earth pig also symbolizes

yellow or gold and this is why 2019 is a year of the golden pig which comes just

once every 60 years 2007 was the year of the red pig but it was marketed as the

year of the golden pig but this year is definitely the year of the golden pig

according to the Chinese zodiac those people in Korea are hoping to benefit

from some Lady Luck in 2019 kimi-san arirang news

For more infomation >> 2019 celebrates the Year of the Golden Pig, which comes every 60 years - Duration: 1:49.

-------------------------------------------

2019 celebrates the Year of the Golden Pig, which comes every 60 years - Duration: 1:54.

the year of the golden pig has finally dawned upon us people here in South

Korea are hoping for better luck in 2019 as pigs symbolize abundance and good

fortune in this country our Kim Hyun Dell's deeper into the meaning of the

year of the golden pig pigs are seen as a symbol of wealth and good fortune in

Korea as they give birth to many piglets during the 1970s and 80s barber shops in

Korea had images of pigs on their walls hoping to attract more customers coin

banks have also long been in the shape of pigs known to be fertile

animals pigs are often associated with abundance and thus many believe that

those born in the year of the pig will live a prosperous life the Chinese

character for home is a combination of a modern character that represents a house

on the top and a character below that represents a pig likewise people have

domesticated pigs for a long time in Korea pigs were used as sacrifice for

memory of rituals for ancestors and were a precious food source for the Korean

people as 2019 is the year of the pig and it's an earth piggy er according to

the sexagenary cycle that are known as kanji that consists of a combination of

a colour and an animal earth pig also symbolizes yellow or gold and this is

why 2019 is the year of the golden pig which comes just once every 60 years

2007 was the year of the red pig but it was marketed as the year of the golden

pig but this year is definitely the year of the golden pig according to the

Chinese zodiac those people in Korea are hoping to benefit from some Lady Luck in

2019 kimi-san arirang news

For more infomation >> 2019 celebrates the Year of the Golden Pig, which comes every 60 years - Duration: 1:54.

-------------------------------------------

Accuracy vs Fluency when Speaking English - Which One Is More Important? - Duration: 13:17.

For more infomation >> Accuracy vs Fluency when Speaking English - Which One Is More Important? - Duration: 13:17.

-------------------------------------------

WHICH 360 CAMERA SHOULD YOU BUY IN 2019?! - Duration: 18:32.

Five, four, three, two, one.

Happy New Year!

(snoring)

- Wha, wh, eh...

Happy... never mind.

Okay so it's January 1st

and you probably know what that means:

It's time to figure out which 360 camera

you should buy in 2019!

I'm not gonna go super in depth in this video

because I've already made in depth reviews

of most of these cameras, but I do wanna give you

a rough idea of which cameras are the top players

and which cameras you should forget about.

I'm only going to cover 360 cameras under $1000

in this video and if there's a camera you have your eye on

that you don't see here, there's a good chance

I knocked it out in a previous video.

Links to all these cameras can be found

down in the description.

So, without further ado,

let's get into it!

I want to start with the camera

that everyone's talking about and that

is the Insta360 One X

And yes, I did just pull it out of my underpants.

So I made a two part review of the One X,

which you've probably seen by now

and I basically declared this as the best 360 camera

of 2018, which kinda makes it seem like the obvious choice

as the best camera to buy in 2019, right?

Well, just wait a minute.

First I'll talk about the pros

and the first one is the design.

This is one of the best designed 360 cameras

I've ever seen.

We've learned so much now about 360 camera design,

after point and shoot cameras have been prevalent

for about three years.

And you can tell that this camera has fixed

all the mistakes of the past cameras.

Things like having a removable battery,

having an LCD screen, having a charging port

that is easy to access, as well as the tripod mount

and SD card slot being situated almost perfectly.

If you added spatial audio mics and replaceable lenses

to this camera, this would be

the perfectly designed 360 camera.

It's also light, slim and pocketable.

I can't stress how important this is

from a 360 camera design.

It's got to be small, compact and easy to take around.

On top of that, the 360 photos and videos it takes

are really impressive.

Most 360 cameras you think of

as being good at just one thing,

whether it be photos or videos, but the One X,

I can confidently say, is excellent

at both photos and videos.

The dynamic range is really good,

the sharpness and resolution is good

and the colors are the best we've seen yet

from an Insta360 camera.

Not only does it shoot 30fps

at 5.7K but it shoots 100fps at 3K.

And this slow motion doesn't look jittery

and simulated, it looks like legit slow motion.

I haven't seen slow motion look this good

from a 360 camera ever, unless you use a lot

of After Effects plugins.

Not only does it do slow motion well

but its hyperlapses are amazing.

All you do is press the record button

and walk for a few minutes and you have yourself

a cinematic masterpiece that you just made in five minutes.

This effect is seriously addictive

and when you combine slow motion with hyperlapse,

you have a video that is going to capture

your audience's attention, scrolling through

that news feed, ten out of ten times.

Next is the workflow.

The One X has the best all around workflow

for photos and videos of any 360 camera.

The app is so well designed and easy to understand

that you don't need a computer anymore

to edit your footage.

You can download your files, reframe and export in minutes

and I'm not talking about a basic edit,

I'm talking about properly edited and reframed 360 videos.

The camera's app should be a big factor

when choosing a 360 camera and no question,

Insta360 have the best.

When coming up with flaws of this camera,

it's really hard to think of them.

If I go by what I've seen in some of the Facebook groups,

the biggest issues people have had was firstly

the audio, there are a few complaints

about the audio not being very good, I disagree,

but I've heard that quite a bit.

Next is its compatibility with a lot of older devices,

specifically Android has been the biggest one

and a few tablets.

It seems like people are trying to use the One X

with devices that are older than about three years

and that's just not going to cut it.

For 5.7K video, if you think about it,

that's a massive file and you're doing a lot

when you're shooting, downloading and editing 5.7K footage,

so you will need a device that is of the last two years

at least, if you wanna have any chance of using the One X.

Do check out part one and two of my One X review

before buying but,

to give you a spoiler,

yes 1000%, you should buy the One X.

I feel like I almost need to change the title

of this video to, Can anything beat the Insta360 One X?

I think you'll find that, a few of these cameras

do beat it at certain things.

It's not the best all around camera,

but I do consider it the best camera for most things.

This brings me to the previous two Insta360 cameras,

the One and the Nano S.

Should you buy these?

Uh, no.

I mean look, just six months ago, these were

two great options and at $239 each,

which is what they're at now,

you should consider them if that's all you've got.

But the One X is such a significant upgrade

from both of these cameras, that it leaves them

with no unique selling points.

There's no reason why you would choose either

of these cameras, if you have $400 to spend.

I know I was very pro Insta360 One last year

but after the One X came out, it improved on this camera

in every single way.

If you already own this, it's still a good camera,

don't get me wrong, but if you're looking to buy

your next camera, then you will wanna consider

the other cameras on this list, specifically the One X.

I hate to say it, but I'm putting both of these cameras

on the Meh list.

Next up we have the Gear 360 family, the 2016 and the 2017

cameras from Samsung.

These were both great and industry leading

when they came out, but in 2019 they have nothing

over their competitors, other than price that is.

I spotted these two on Amazon this morning

for $76 and $59, which makes them among

the cheapest 360 cameras money can buy.

This is the only reason these cameras

are still on this list. (bell dings)

If you don't wanna spend a lot,

but you wanna get a taste for 360,

these are good basic cameras for a good basic 360 result.

The 2016 is only compatible with Samsung phones,

the 2017 is with Android and iPhone

but you will wanna double check before you buy it.

Next is the YI 360 VR, my old nemesis.

And straight away, the list I'm putting this on

is the do not miss out on a great bargain.

I looked on Amazon this morning and it was $183, oh my god!

Yeah, you heard right, $183 for a 5.7K camera.

I've had my issues with the YI in the past,

the main one being, it's not really compatible

with MAC or iPhone and I'm an Apple person,

so this camera is unusable to me.

But if you're on PC or you're on Android,

you should absolutely consider this camera,

if your budget is under $200.

The results you'll get are fine, not amazing.

The dynamic range isn't good, the colors aren't great

but the sharpness is really good.

It's got both high resolution photos and videos,

so if you're one of those people that totally geeks out

over resolution over everything else,

then you should consider the YI 360 VR.

I'm putting this in the buy category

(bell dings)

for the moment.

If it goes back up to its former price,

which is $399, it's going back on the Meh list.

That's the thing with these cameras,

if the price is right, then it can put some

older cameras like this one, back into contention

as a serious camera to buy.

Next is the Garmin adjective.

No I'm just kidding, it's the Garmin VIRB, ha ha ha ha ha.

And not a lot has changed with this camera since last time,

including the price.

This is still a $699 360 camera

and it just doesn't warrant buying it over the others.

The only thing it has above all the other 360 cameras,

is its replaceable lenses.

And don't get me wrong, replaceable lenses

is a really good feature but is it worth $700 for that?

No, may as well buy two cheaper cameras

and risk one getting broken.

If you take a lot of risks with your 360 camera,

I would consider it, since it's also shock proof

but otherwise, I'm putting the VIRB,

(bell dings)

in the Meh list.

Next is another 360 camera with a funny name

and it's the Kandao QooCam.

I made a video called,

Why you Shouldn't Buy the Kandao QooCam,

but if you watched it you'll see,

that's not really what I meant.

I meant it was still early days.

The camera had a lot of potential

that it hadn't fulfilled yet

and I feel like it's come a long way

in the last few months.

Firstly, it's one of the only 360 cameras

that doubles as a 180 camera.

That's really cool and when you take 180 photos

and videos, it's really cool to watch them back.

Especially now that Facebook have introduced

the 3D photo feature.

You can now shoot photos on the QooCam,

upload them to Facebook and they'll appear as 3D photos.

When you watch back your 180s in a headset,

this is where it really shines.

You can see layers of depth within your photos and videos.

They're actually way more immersive

than 360 photos and videos because 360 only has one layer,

whereas 180 has several layers of depth.

So that's cool and that's what I'd say

the unique selling point of the QooCam is.

It also does potentially the best

360 video stabilization of any of these cameras,

but not by much.

They're all extremely good

and other cameras like the Rylo and the One X

are maybe one percent less good than the QooCam.

So that's not really the deciding factor.

The 360 photos and videos that come from it are good,

they're not outstanding

but they're good enough for social media.

Now that they added DNG raw to the QooCam,

I'd say it probably has the best DNG raw

of any 360 camera.

A lot of them do it now, but personally I notice

from playing around in Photoshop,

I can recover so much more detail with QooCam DNGs

than I could with any other camera.

Did I mention it has a three hour battery life,

that's really impressive, since the average 360 camera

battery lasts about an hour.

Should you buy the QooCam?

(bell dings) Yeah, if you wanna shoot 180,

you wanna shoot DNG raw

and you need a camera with a really long battery life,

then you should seriously consider this camera.

Exterminate, exterminate!

The next camera, is the Ultracker Aleta S2C

and you're probably thinking, what the hell did he just say?

Yes this is a camera that not too many people

know about, including myself.

I can admit, I have not turned this camera on yet,

because I just got it in the mail,

but that is my goal for early 2019.

Why is this camera special though?

Is it because it looks like a spaceship?

No, this camera is special

because it shoots 66 megapixels 360 photos.

Yes you heard that right, 66 megapixels 360 photos.

The next highest we've seen from a consumer 360 camera

has been 30 megapixels,

that's more than double the resolution.

From the samples I've seen, the sharpness looks really good

and I feel like this camera is the half way point,

between a point and shoot 360 camera

and shooting 360s with DSLR.

I've gotta say, the exposure balance wasn't great

from those samples but maybe those

just weren't taken with optimal settings.

It does have inbuilt HDR

and inbuilt stitching but at a $999 price point,

I would say wait (bell dings)

until I get a proper video out, before you go ahead

and buy the Ultracker Aleta S2C.

(space warbles)

Another shout out, real quick, to a camera

that has just been released,

that I haven't gotten my hands on yet

and that's the Vuze XR.

This is a 5.7K 360 video camera,

that also doubles as a 180 camera,

so this could very well give the Kandao QooCam

a run for its money.

I can't say too much yet because I haven't used it

but it's $439, stay tuned, because I will have videos

coming out later in January

(bell dings) to cover the Vuze XR.

Next camera on the list, is the Theta V.

And straight away, I'm putting the Theta V

in the do not buy category. (bell dings)

Wah, what, what?

Mr Ben I've watched your videos

and you told me to buy the Theta V and now you say this.

I know, that's a pretty bold call isn't it?

Well here's the reason.

I have a sneaking suspicion that Ricoh

will be a releasing a new camera soon.

Late last year we saw Insta360 release their new camera

and we all expected something new from Ricoh

and we didn't get anything.

Normally two months, three months before Christmas

is the time that they all release new cameras

and we heard nothing.

So Ricoh are definitely due for a new camera.

I can't say when, I have no idea when

but I'm pretty certain it is going to happen soon-ish.

And the Theta V is a good camera,

I've always been a fan of it,

but if you're looking to buy your next camera,

you shouldn't buy it.

Because no doubt, Ricoh will be working on

the next generation camera and it's worth waiting

that extra little bit so you can get the latest

and greatest Theta Camera.

Hm, hm, hm, I just started a rumor, a 360 rumor.

(laughing)

Next are the twins.

The Mi Sphere and the Madventure 360 camera.

And you know what, I'm getting stick of sticking up

for the Madventure 360.

It was supposed to be different to the Mi Sphere.

They were supposed to add all these great features.

But, they haven't.

It's just an orange Mi Sphere, there, I said it.

But not just an orange Mi Sphere,

an orange Mi Sphere at $310,

when the Mi Sphere is at $222.

Why would you pay more?

It makes no sense.

Yes it might come with a few more accessories in the box

but is that really worth almost $100?

No, therefore I'm putting the Madventure 360

(bell dings) in the do not buy category.

Because of the much cheaper price,

the Mi Sphere is the obvious choice of these two cameras.

But why should you buy the Mi Sphere?

Yes, it has been outdone by the One X

in basically every way, but I still do consider it

very much a relevant camera in 2019.

This is firstly for its all round ability

with both photos and videos.

There's so much you can do with this camera in both areas.

It shoots amazing 360 photos with very good resolution

and the 360 videos are also really good.

It actually has a lot going for it.

Check out my Mi Sphere review if you haven't seen it already

to see everything, but the reason it's still here

and the reason I'm putting it in the buy category,

is the price.

If you're someone with only $222 to spend

and you want a good result for your 360 photos and videos,

then the Mi Sphere is the obvious option.

It's definitely not as good as the One X

but I'd say it's 2/3 as good, for half the price.

So if you can't afford the $399 price tag

of the One X, then you will wanna consider the Mi Sphere,

because it's still the best (bell dings)

and most versatile 360 camera, under $300.

Next we have this little camera.

The Rylo, which was groundbreaking when it came out

for its amazing six axis stabilization.

It was the best at the time

and totally blew all the other cameras out of the water.

In early 2018 its draw cards were its stabilization,

hyperlapses and reframing.

And over the course of the year, Insta360 copied everything.

Not only did they get their stabilization as good

as the Rylo, but they added the hyperlapse effect

to the One X app.

And the reframing in the app is now better than Rylos.

And look, they have been working on the Rylo

in the past year, they've added features

like 5.8K video up from 4K.

They've added a desktop app and they fixed a few of their

workflow issues but, I just can't think of why

you would buy the Rylo over the Insta360 One X,

it's better in basically, no ways.

So I'm sorry to say it Rylo but Insta360

took all of your best features

and you're left with nothing.

(paper snapping)

And by nothing I mean it's still got lots of good features

but if you're buying a camera for the first time,

(bell dings) the One X has everything

over the Rylo.

Last but not least, it's One X's biggest competitor,

the GoPro Fusion.

The Fusion was the winner last time I made this video

but due to GoPro not doing too well as a company,

they haven't updated the firmware, the software,

the app, nothing.

And that's okay because it was a really good camera already

so that wasn't something that had to happen.

But I guess we're just kinda getting used to having

all of these updates, all the time

with most other 360 cameras.

And we're not going to get them anymore from GoPro

because it seems like they've given up that 360 pursuits

for now, so I'm not expecting a Fusion two

and I'm not expecting any future updates on the Fusion.

The good is, the Fusion shoots amazing 360 photos

and 360 videos, they're absolutely incredible.

In today, in 2019, the 360 video from the Fusion

absolutely blows me away.

The dynamic range is so good, it looks really sharp

and the image is just beautiful.

But what's not good is the workflow.

This has always been its biggest flaw

and it's never been fixed.

It's always been hard to edit your photos on your phone

and that's just a basic thing for 360 cameras,

having the ability to download to your phone

and edit your 360 photos.

You can't do that with the Fusion.

Even a year after it's been released.

We did see any update to Fusion Studio,

which is a desktop app, a few months ago,

but it didn't really fix the bigger problem

people were having, which is, footage taking days

to render and stitch and export.

The software constantly crashing even on fast computers,

as well as the file sizes being ginormous.

That made creating these beautiful 360 videos,

kinda hard to do, almost impossible for a lot of people.

You really need a minimum of 16 gigabytes of RAM

and a four gigabyte graphics card

to make this camera workable

and not many people have those specs.

I even upgraded my computer to quadruple that

and I still had a few issues.

So for me, that means the Fusion workflow

takes a minimum of an hour to even do a basic video

and I don't have an hour free, I'm a busy guy.

So as a result, I just haven't used the Fusion

in the past few months.

Once I discovered the One X and how fast the workflow can be

I fell in love, and any workflow longer than 10 minutes

made me feel like I was really wasting my time.

So while I think the Fusion does produce

an exceptional result, you need a fast computer

to work with it.

If you don't have that, don't bother.

I'm putting the GoPro Fusion (bell dings)

on the cameras you should consider list.

Man, the One X is a real jerk.

It's basically taken all the best features

of 2018's best cameras and combined them

into one perfect camera.

Now I don't work for Insta360

and I'm not being paid to say this

but none of us expected this, that one camera

would make all these other cameras unnecessary.

Since I got it a few months ago,

I haven't used any of these cameras.

Be gone with you!

(hands clap)

Yeah, that's better.

So, this is the front runner in early 2019.

No doubt this hierarchy will change as the year progresses,

so definitely hit that subscribe button

if you wanna find out about all the latest

and greatest 360 cameras that 2019 has to offer.

Also do check out my full reviews of all the cameras

you've seen today, if any of them peak your interest

and you wanna learn more.

Also I'd be keen to know,

(bell dings) what is your favorite

360 camera in early 2019 and why?

Leave a comment down there and let me know.

Also I wanna let you guys know,

my 360 video course is on sale right now.

So you can find a link to that down in the description.

That's it for me, I hope you have a Happy New Year

and capture your world in 360 in 2019

and I'll see you in the next video.

(snoring)

For more infomation >> WHICH 360 CAMERA SHOULD YOU BUY IN 2019?! - Duration: 18:32.

-------------------------------------------

Campaign fail number 1? Instagram Live video which shows Elizabeth Warren chugging on a beer - Duration: 18:14.

Campaign fail number 1? Presidential hopeful Elizabeth Warren is blasted for 'desperate' and 'try hard' Instagram Live video which shows her chugging on a beer

Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts is being widely criticized on Tuesday for pandering to millennials by posting a live video Q&A on Instagram while chugging on a beer.

The 69-year-old Warren cracked open a beer on-camera on an Instagram livestream on New Year's Eve, and took questions from followers.

The seemingly-spontaneous video channeled similar social-media efforts by former Texas Senate candidate Beto O'Rourke and incoming New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, following Warren's announcement Monday that she is forming an exploratory committee for a 2020 run.

'I'm here in my kitchen, uh, and um, I thought maybe we'd just take some questions and I'd see what I can do,' Warren began as she looked into a camera apparently set up on a countertop.

She continued: 'It's been kind of an amazing day.

So, today, I, um, got up early this morning, and, uh, talked to a bunch of folks on the phone, and then went outside and talked to the press -- and this is our house, and has been for a long time, and there are all these reporters, and trucks, and everybody outside the house.'.

Shortly afterwards she said: 'Hold on a second -- I'm gonna get me a beer,' and walked out of view of the camera.

Warren, who has a proven track record as a small-dollar fundraiser, announced upon returning that she has already received donations from individuals in all 50 states, the District, and Puerto Rico, adding: 'It really has been an exciting day,' she said.

She told followers she and her husband would be following their usual New Year's Eve routine: 'We watch Casablanca, we get some good food. and, um, we sit there upstairs and we watch Casablanca.'. She added the movie fills her with hope.

Ocasio-Cortez, 29, used Instagram stories and livestreams during her run last year to connect with her supporters. O'Rourke often broadcast himself cooking at home during his failed bid to unseat Ted Cruz in Texas.

But Warren's appeal to young voters struck many as inauthentic given her personality. 'Elizabeth Warren seems more like a chardonnay senator than a beer senator,' Boston University politics professor Tobe Berkovitz told The Boston Herald.

'It's just sort of trying too hard … and people have pretty good radar for that sort of thing. Ryan Williams, a Republican strategist, said: 'She's never really made this type of appeal.

'She's nervous about newer younger faces in the Democratic party. 'She's making a pretty desperate attempt to make it look like she's cool.

The reaction on social media was similarly critical. 'Looks like we have candidates shamelessly copying [Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez] by doing kitchen Instagram videos,' tweeted Laura Wilson.

'Either Democrats think 12-year-olds vote or they realize their base is stupid and votes for style over substance,' tweeted another Twitter user. 'It's impossible to take Elizabeth Warren seriously,' tweeted Lee Border.

'Elizabeth Warren took a moment out of her "I'm just a regular gal" video to go get a beer, crack it open and drink it. The hypocrisy is astounding,' tweeted a Twitter user.

Other Twitter users said Warren drinking beer was ironic given that Democrats thought Brett Kavanaugh wasn't fit to be a Supreme Court Justice.

Kavanaugh was confirmed to the bench after a bitter battle during which a woman came forward to accuse him of attempted rape during a high school party more than 30 years ago.

Journalist Michael Tracey tweeted: 'Oh my god every 2020 presidential candidate is going to livestream their personal lives non-stop like insecure teens. Happy frickin new year.'.

Warren is the first candidate to take the major step toward a run in what is expected to be a crowded field.

Ocasio-Cortez's communications director told Rolling Stone his candidate thought social media had 'more capacity for transparency and just to be herself'.

President Donald Trump said on Monday that he would 'love to run' against Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, though one would have to 'ask her psychiatrist' if she has a chance to win.

It was unclear what Trump meant by the comment, which he made during an interview on the Fox News Channel on Monday.

'I wish her well, I'd love to run against her,' the President told Fox News after Warren announced that she was forming an exploratory committee - the first step which indicates a plan to eventually run for the White House.

Trump then mentioned the controversy over a DNA test which Warren took to prove that she is of Native American origin. 'She did very badly in proving that she was of Indian heritage,' Trump said.

'That didn't work out too well. I think [Fox News reporter Pete Hegseth] ha[s] more than she does, and maybe I do too, and I have nothing. 'So we'll see how she does.

When Trump was asked if she can win, he replied: 'Well, I don't know, you'd have to ask her psychiatrist. Warren dodged questions on Monday about her biggest political liabilities as she jumped headfirst into the 2020 Democratic presidential primary process.

In announcing the formation of a presidential exploratory committee, Warren staked out the first significant territory in what will likely be a crowded field of Democrats itching for a swing at Trump.

But she showed no sign she's ready to overcome the self-inflected scandal that has dogged her for years: her questionable claim of American Indian ancestry.

The result was an unsteady performance that none of the three major cable news networks broadcast live from beginning to end.

Asked in her first question as a candidate-in-waiting how she will respond to Democrats who worry that her slow-motion ancestry gaffe had left her too vulnerable to be electable, Warren defaulted to talking points.

'I'm in this fight because I understand what's happening to working families,' she said outside her home near Boston, standing alongside her husband Bruce Mann.

Trump has long been critical of Warren for claiming to have Cherokee ancestry, a move the president claims gave her preferential treatment in university hiring at Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania.

Warren conceded this month that she is 'not a person of color,' following her embarrassing October release of DNA test data that concluded her proportion of American Indian blood might be as small as 1 part in 1,024 – lower than average European-Americans.

She sidestepped a separate question on Monday about whether her far-left brand of populism will polarize American voters, denying her meaningful support outside the liberal northeast U.S. Instead she acknowledged only that CEOs and investment bankers won't like her.

'The problem we've got right now in Washington is that it works great for those who have money, to buy influence,' said Warren, 69. 'And I'm fighting against that, and you bet it's going to make a lot of people unhappy.'.

The 69-year-old Democrat would not, however, rule out accepting help from super PACs built with their political contributions. 'Would you take support from super PACs,' a reporter asked.

A flustered Warren said only that 'I don't think we ought to be running campaigns that are funded by billionaires, whether it goes through super PACs or their own money that they're spending.

That fell short of a pledge to shun their help as she runs for the White House.

'I've already received donations from all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico,' she boasted, before revealing that she would spend New Year's Eve with her husband doing what they always do: watching the 1942 film 'Casablanca.

Trump aides licked their chops and laughed as they anticipated a battle between the president and the ultra-liberal swashbuckler he regularly mocks as 'Pocahontas.

A Trump administration official with knowledge of the president's thinking said Monday that Warren 'will go down in flames,' and cracked a subtle Native American joke. 'She's going to somehow ride her far-left platform into the White House?' the official asked.

'How?'. 'It's a dream come true,' said a second official, adding a fond hope that Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal would follow Warren into the race.

'Can we get Blumenthal to run too? More phony Democrats, please,' said that official. Trump has similarly weaponized Blumenthal's past missteps, turning his military career into a case of stolen valor because he has falsely claimed to have fought in Vietnam.

Blumenthal served in uniform as a U.S. Marine reservist for six years but spent the war thousands of miles from harm's way. Warren's New Year's Eve launch guaranteed she had the nation's political spotlight largely to herself.

'America's middle class is under attack,' the 69-year-old Massachusetts Democrat said in a launch video. 'How did we get here? Billionaires and big corporations decided they wanted more of the pie. And they enlisted politicians to cut them a bigger slice.'.

She tried to strike a uniting tone, declaring that 'no matter what our differences, most of us want the same thing: 'to be able to work hard, play by the same set of rules and take care of the people we love.

That's what I'm fighting for.'. The Republican National Committee blasted out a scathing reply. Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said that Warren 'couldn't be more out of touch.

With her lack of support from voters – including in her home state – on top of her phony claim to minority status, now that she is formally running Americans will see her for what she is: another extreme far-left obstructionist and a total fraud.'.

Warren burst onto the national scene a decade ago during the financial crisis with calls for greater consumer protections.

She quickly became one of the party's more prominent liberals even as she sometimes fought with Obama administration officials over their response to the market turmoil.

Now, as a likely presidential contender, she is making an appeal to the party's base. Her video notes the economic challenges facing people of color along with images of a women's march and Warren's participation at an LGBT event.

In an email to supporters, Warren said she'd more formally announce a campaign plan early in 2019.

Warren is the most prominent Democrat yet to make a move toward a presidential bid and has long been a favorite target of President Donald Trump.

In mid-December, former Obama housing chief Julian Castro also announced a presidential exploratory committee, which legally allows potential candidates to begin raising money. John Delaney is the only Democrat so far to have formally announced a presidential campaign.

But that's likely to change quickly in the new year as other leading Democrats take steps toward White House runs.

Warren enters a Democratic field that's shaping up as the most crowded in decades, with many of her Senate colleagues openly weighing their own campaigns, as well as governors, mayors and other prominent citizens.

One of her most significant competitors could be Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who is eyeing another presidential run harnessing the same populist rhetoric.

She must also move past the widely panned October DNA test stunt meant to bolster her claim to Native American heritage. Instead, the use of a genetic test to prove her ethnicity emboldened Trump's taunts of her as 'Pocahontas.'.

There was no direct mention of the controversy, or of Trump, in Monday's video. It did include images of the president and his inner-circle current and former aides who her base most loves to hate: Kellyanne Conway, Stephen Miller and Steve Bannon.

Warren has the benefit of higher name recognition than many others in the Democratic mix for 2020, thanks to her years as a prominent critic of Wall Street who originally conceived of what became the government's Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

She now faces an arduous battle to raise money and capture Democratic primary voters' attention before Iowa casts its first vote in more than a year.

She has an advantage in the $12. 5 million left over from her 2018 re-election campaign that she could use for a presidential run.

Warren's campaign is likely to revolve around the same theme she's woven into speeches and policy proposals in recent years: battling special interests, paying mind to the nexus between racial and economic inequities.

'America's middle class is under attack,' Warren said in the video. 'How did we get here? Billionaires and big corporations decided they wanted more of the pie. And they enlisted politicians to cut them a fatter slice.'.

For more infomation >> Campaign fail number 1? Instagram Live video which shows Elizabeth Warren chugging on a beer - Duration: 18:14.

-------------------------------------------

BRING IT ON VS. RAISE YOUR VOICE: WHICH ONE HAS YOU CHEERING? - Duration: 0:45.

For more infomation >> BRING IT ON VS. RAISE YOUR VOICE: WHICH ONE HAS YOU CHEERING? - Duration: 0:45.

-------------------------------------------

'This disease is a monster': virus which has left hundreds of kids paralyzed since 2012 - Duration: 15:07.

'This disease is a monster': Furious moms blast CDC for failing to act on mystery polio-like virus which has left hundreds of kids paralyzed since 2012, killed at least two and is now expected to hit unprecedented levels in 2020

Furious mothers of children who have been left partially disabled and fully paralyzed by the polio-like illness of Acute Flaccid Myelitis (AFM) have blasted the CDC for failing to act - and say they warned the organization that 2018 was going to be the worst year yet.

Several parents of children who were diagnosed with the illness up to four years ago have spoken to DailyMail. com and revealed their anger that more has not been done to educate doctors and stop the illness in its tracks.

This year the number of cases reached its highest yet with 341 children taken ill across 39 states - 186 of those cases have so far been confirmed with investigations underway on the rest.

That is a steady climb from the 35 confirmed in 2017, 149 in 2016, 22 in 2015 and 120 in 2014. The illness appears to surge every other year with every resurgence worst than the last.

More than 17 countries have reported the odd AFM case, however, only the US has biannual surges and now experts are warning ahead for 2020.

The disease has been likened to polio, which struck tens of thousands of children a year in the US before its vaccine was introduced in the 1950s. However, this virus is not thought to be responsible for the outbreaks.

It may be caused by the EV-D68 virus, which is a distant relative of polio and coincided with many cases in 2014.

CDC doctor Dr Ruth Lynfield calls EV-D68 'the leading hypothesis'. EV-A71, another polio relative, and rhinovirus are also suspects but no conclusions have been reached.

In past cases it has robbed children of the use of limbs but has also left many fully paralyzed and even in need of ventilators to breathe. At least two children have died.

Parents of those affected say many could have been saved in this year's outbreak if only the CDC had acted sooner to raise awareness of the condition.

And worryingly they say their actions still aren't good enough in the face of the outbreak which expects say will only be worse in the next expected wave of 2020.

Heather Werdal's son Hayden was stricken by AFM back in 2014 when he was just 13.

Within nine days from getting a cold he was paralyzed. Now four years on he can speak and move his right arm slightly but that is all and he is considered a quadriplegic.

'Up until this summer I don't think the CDC did anything,' she said from her home in Bremerton, Washington. 'I don't think they took it seriously. They said, 'We were so caught off guard when it happened'.

Are you freaking kidding me? Us parents have been talking about it for years and by the time the first cases were reported this year, we knew we were facing a bad year – that's what outraged us.'.

'We think there are a lot more cases that the CDC admits to or have officially diagnosed. We have over 600 affected parents on our parents board.'.

The parents want states to be forced to report cases and to have a protocol for handling those brought to the ER room displaying symptoms of the disease.

They saw too few doctors are aware of the possibility of AFM - let alone actively on the lookout for it.

Werdal also says that little has been done to study past cases - limiting the ability of scientists to even begin to find a cure.

'No one is following our children,' she said. 'How do you track a new disease and see what treatments work and recovery looks like when nobody is following our kids.'.

Angie Anderson's daughter Mckenzie was six when she fell ill with 'the sniffles' just before Christmas in 2014. Within 12 days she was a quadriplegic completely paralyzed from the neck down with a machine to breathe for her.

Her mother flagged the possibility of AFM in her first call to the pediatrics office but the doctor had never heard of it.

She was told to stay home and monitor her daughter for what was likely a cold. Soon she lost control of all of her limbs and eventually her ability to breathe unaided.

'It has been so poorly handled,' she told DailyMail. com from their home in Albany, Oregon. 'I have been so frustrated and maddened. I thought after all these kids getting sick someone would have paid attention.

And It comes out of the blue so quick. But there was no information in the hospital - it's just all this garbage about Ebola.

They spend millions on all these other diseases but when it's 120 kids they say it's a drop in the bucket.

'Every other year it gets more and more serious. We kept telling people, '2018 is going to be a bad year', because every other year it gets worse and nobody listened. Nobody wanted anything to do with it.

'One kid is too many and these numbers are getting higher every year. This disease is a monster.'. In November, the CDC finally launched a task-force to look into the condition.

It will bring together experts to discuss the CDC's response to the outbreak and will make regular reports on what is being done.

Some parents were invited for a one-off meeting with the body - the first time the government body has officially met with them.

'I want to reaffirm to parents, patients, and our Nation CDC's commitment to this serious medical condition,' said CDC Director Robert Redfield, MD, in a press release.

'This Task Force will ensure that the full capacity of the scientific community is engaged and working together to provide important answers and solutions to actively detect, more effectively treat, and ultimately prevent AFM and its consequences.

Katie and JP Bustamante's son Alex, 6, died in May after falling ill with AFM in 2016. Katie reveals that doctors were so badly briefed about the illness that they were searching the internet for answers on AFM.

Eventually the couple were the ones who ended up briefing medics from parent message boards about possibly ways to treat the condition. 'We had no idea what was happening and neither did the doctors,' Katie told Dailymail. com.

'They first suggested a stroke - but the tests did not support that. After a few days they had narrowed it down to AFM or Transverse Myelitis, neither of which we had heard of.

It took over a week for them to determine that it was AFM. I think the PICU doctors were very puzzled and really had no idea what to do other than treat the symptoms.

There was an intelligent, well rounded team of doctors, but there just wasn't any information available. They were searching on the internet for answers.'.

I was shocked to know that it had been around for four years prior to Alex's diagnosis. When I tried to do my own research, there was nothing from the medical community available. Nothing.

'I believe that the CDC has finally jumped to attention. But it took the AFM families reaching out to the media to get there.

Also, I think that we need more than just the CDC; there needs to be substantial research to find out what is causing AFM and how to treat and prevent it.

Other groups need to be involved and I hope to see that happen. 'Once Alex told me he couldn't use his thumb, I called our hospital and we were on our way to emergency within the hour.

I wish I had known about some of the acute phase treatments that were successful for other families. 'He may have had somewhat of a chance. You assume the ICU doctors know what they're doing.

I wish I could have found the parents' Facebook group right away because frankly, that's where most of our treatment ideas were taken from, and then we would present them to our doctors and seek out the physicians that were aware of them.

'After about four months we started to realize that we knew more about AFM than the doctors. Alex was training them.'. The couple are now part of the AFM Association Afmanow. org alongside Heather Werdal.

WHAT IS ACUTE FLACCID MYELITIS (AFM)?. The term 'myelitis' means inflammation of the spinal cord.

Transverse myelitis is the broad name of the disease, and there are various sub-types. It is a neurological disorder which inflames the spinal cord across its width ('transverse'), destroying the fatty substance that protects nerve cells.

That can lead to paralysis. AFM is an unusual sub-type of transverse myelitis.

Patients starts with the same spinal inflammation, but their symptoms are different and the disease develops differently. The main distinction is that AFM patients are weak and limp, while patients with general transverse myelitis tend to be rigid.

Most AFM patients start to struggle with movement of the limbs, face, tongue, and eyes. They then begin to lose control of one limb or sometimes the whole body - though many maintain control of their sensory, bowel and bladder functions.

Unlike transverse myelitis, which has been around for years, doctors are still in the dark about why and how AFM manifests itself. WHAT IS ACUTE FLACCID MYELITIS (AFM)?.

The term 'myelitis' means inflammation of the spinal cord. Transverse myelitis is the broad name of the disease, and there are various sub-types.

It is a neurological disorder which inflames the spinal cord across its width ('transverse'), destroying the fatty substance that protects nerve cells. That can lead to paralysis.

AFM is an unusual sub-type of transverse myelitis. Patients starts with the same spinal inflammation, but their symptoms are different and the disease develops differently.

The main distinction is that AFM patients are weak and limp, while patients with general transverse myelitis tend to be rigid. Most AFM patients start to struggle with movement of the limbs, face, tongue, and eyes.

They then begin to lose control of one limb or sometimes the whole body - though many maintain control of their sensory, bowel and bladder functions.

Unlike transverse myelitis, which has been around for years, doctors are still in the dark about why and how AFM manifests itself.

For more infomation >> 'This disease is a monster': virus which has left hundreds of kids paralyzed since 2012 - Duration: 15:07.

-------------------------------------------

2020 Candidates Are Lining Up. Which Democrat Matches the Moment? The New York Times - Duration: 6:13.

2020 Candidates Are Lining Up. Which Democrat Matches the Moment? The New York Times

By and

Senator Elizabeth Warrens formation of an exploratory committee for president on Monday represents a sort of political ball drop, the beginning of a new year and new campaign that will feature an unusually large number of Democrats seeking the presidency.

As the 2020 Democratic primary gets underway, the defining characteristic of this first stage of the race is the sheer uncertainty about who is even running. More than 30 Democrats are mulling presidential bids, but hardly any of them qualify as an instant front runner or a gifted, tested campaigner, and some of the biggest names could pass in the end.

Even beyond the field of specific candidates, this will be one of the most fluid nominating contests Democrats have had in recent decades. A leaderless party, they are in a moment of transition from center left politics to a more ideologically pure brand of liberalism.

Democrats are grappling with what they stand for, what their voters expect, and what demographic groups will be most critical in winning an Electoral College majority in 2020. But most of all, they are unified by a once unimaginable objective that only illustrates how unpredictable American politics has become: ensuring Donald J. Trump is just a one term president.

It is hard to recall a recent presidential primary where, at the outset of the race, there was this much genuine mystery — not only about who would eventually emerge as the nominee, but who planned to run at all.

Ms. Warrens announcement Monday was expected. And it will not be a surprise when in the coming weeks.

But the number of would be candidates who may ultimately stay out of the race is larger than the list of contenders who are certain to run.

There are the well known, or at least much buzzed about, Democrats who are still deliberating: Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. is the most prominent of this group, and leads the field in initial polling in Iowa. But there is also great anticipation over Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, the runner up for the Democratic nomination in 2016, and , whose losing Senate bid this year electrified many grass roots Democrats.

It is unclear if any of these men will enter the race — particularly Mr. Biden, who, associates say, is ambivalent about running after over three decades of presidential fits and starts.

[Make sense of the people, issues and ideas ]

There is also great uncertainty about lesser known potential contenders who could be formidable — and if the Trump phenomenon proves anything, it is that making any assumptions about candidates is folly.

Will and — who both just won third terms in presidential battleground states — go beyond their flirtation with running? And what of the roster of current and former Democratic governors, like Steve Bullock of Montana or Terry McAuliffe of Virginia?

Presidential politics recalls the adage that 80 percent of life is showing up.

Except in the case of primaries. Then, its about knowing when to show up.

That question, more than anything, is what looms over Ms. Warrens candidacy: Would she be the president today if she had run in 2016, as some liberal activists and admirers urged her to? Mr. Sanders ended up filling the void on the populist left and ran a surprisingly strong campaign against Hillary Clinton.

Ms. Warren was hardly the first White House hopeful to risk waiting. Bill Clinton, for example, opted out of the 1988 campaign and still became president four years later.

But the more recent history of presidential calculations suggests that candidates are wiser to run when the moment presents itself. That is what Mr. Obama did in 2008 after just four years in the Senate, the same period Ms. Warren would have served by 2016. Some Democrats think 2020 is Mr. ORourkes moment: He has been in the House for just six years, but many liberals see his energy and freshness as inspiring.

[ Earlier than you may think.]

One reason Ms. Warren announced on Monday and declared so early, her allies suggested, was to erase any uncertainty about her intentions among supporters whom she kept waiting — and ultimately disappointed — in 2016.

But now, instead of a head to head race against Mrs. Clinton, Ms. Warren is entering a wide open campaign facing questions about her sensitivity on race and her political savvy after the release of a DNA test of her Native American heritage. and did nothing to stop Mr. Trumps mockery of her roots.

Timing is also crucial in presidential races because the issues can change so quickly. Mr. Trumps incendiary rhetoric and policies around race and immigration have shifted the political conversation away from matters of economic inequality, which has been the lifes work of Ms. Warren and which defined much of the 2016 Democratic primary.

Still, her party has plainly moved to the left on economics and social justice. So as much as anything, Ms. Warrens candidacy will test whether 2020 primary voters will demand that their candidates take unwavering positions on issues like universal health care and Wall Street regulations, much as they have historically expected them to do so on supporting abortion rights.

Mr. Sanderss 2016 candidacy demonstrated that there is hunger among Democrats to confront Wall Street excesses and income inequality. But whats less clear is how much of a premium the voters will put on purity on these issues — and if they will overlook a softer line from a candidate who inspires them and who they think can defeat Mr. Trump.

Ms. Warren is one of several potential candidates who have crusaded against the influence of wealthy donors and corporations, even to the point of calling out fellow Democrats for taking a more pliant approach to big dollar fund raising and business regulation. And she is unlikely to be any less confrontational with rivals in the primary who are heavily backed by billionaire donors, or who are billionaires themselves.

I dont think we ought to be running campaigns that are funded by billionaires, whether it goes through super PACs or their own money that theyre spending, she told reporters on Monday. Democrats are the party of the people.

That poses a threat to possible Democratic candidates like Michael R. Bloomberg and Tom Steyer, who are aligned with liberals on important issues like climate change and immigration but embody the kind of capitalist wealth that many despise. She may also cause trouble for non billionaires like Mr. Booker and Mr. McAuliffe, who have collected enormous sums of money over the years from banks, hedge funds and pharmaceutical corporations. Mr. Booker recently became the first candidate to have a super PAC formed in support of his anticipated campaign.

There is reason to expect Democratic primary voters and activists will be wary of candidates they see as too cozy with big money.

In the 2018 midterms, Democratic candidates who disavowed corporate money fared exceedingly well in primary elections, and the incoming House majority is expected to make ethics and campaign finance legislation one of its first priorities. Revulsion from a money soaked political system is one of a few concerns that links Democrats on the activist left, such as Representative elect Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, with less ideological party favorites like Mr. ORourke.

It is not difficult to imagine Ms. Warren emerging as a kind of good government buzz saw on debate stages dotted with billionaires and super PAC beneficiaries. Whether or not voters thrill to her persona or policies, there may be no candidate better equipped than she is to help set the rules of engagement around political money and the 2020 field — and to call out those who flout them.

Ms. Warrens step into the 2020 race was one of the biggest political stories of the day, but even a Democrat of her stature had to share the news cycle with an and . So it is likely to go for most of the 2020 campaign, as a president prone to political brinkmanship and angry outbursts simultaneously navigates divided government and his own battle for a second term.

Crises in government could routinely overshadow the Democratic primary campaign. Democrats internal debates about ideology and their partys identity could be obscured by louder, more venomous clashes between the two parties. And challengers hoping to beat Mr. Trump on the campaign trail may have difficulty competing for attention when he is in the White House — or on Twitter.

At times, there could also be moments of friction between the Democrats running for president and the Democrats helming the party in Congress. In the case of the shutdown, there is relatively little daylight, at least so far: Neither legislative leaders like Nancy Pelosi nor candidates like Ms. Warren want to build a border wall. But in other fights — from cabinet nominations to possible impeachment proceedings — there may be a wider gap between would be presidents striving to win primary votes and legislative tacticians aiming to outmaneuver Republicans or cut deals with them.

Candidates like Ms. Warren, and other sitting senators like Ms. Harris and Mr. Booker, will each have to strike their own balance between joining the fights of the day in Washington — often in reaction to Mr. Trump — and introducing themselves to voters around the country, outlining their agendas and drawing contrasts with their rivals for the nomination.

For more infomation >> 2020 Candidates Are Lining Up. Which Democrat Matches the Moment? The New York Times - Duration: 6:13.

-------------------------------------------

CAMPERSION PIXEL LAB VS PICS ART WHICH ONE IS BATTER (HINDHI/URDU) 2019 - Duration: 7:16.

For more infomation >> CAMPERSION PIXEL LAB VS PICS ART WHICH ONE IS BATTER (HINDHI/URDU) 2019 - Duration: 7:16.

-------------------------------------------

If you could only pick one social media channel, which would you choose? - #FTZCHATS - Episode #11 - Duration: 3:19.

For more infomation >> If you could only pick one social media channel, which would you choose? - #FTZCHATS - Episode #11 - Duration: 3:19.

-------------------------------------------

Dan Whiston's Dancing On Ice predictions and which contestants are ones to watch - Duration: 10:06.

 Dan Whiston has revealed which contestants he's got his eye on for Dancing On Ice victory

 The three-time champion is returning to the ITV show in a brand new role this year, and he'll be working with all the celebrities and professionals as the associate creative director

 And before the show has even started, Dan's revealed his ones to watch

 He knows what he's talking about, having won the show three times, on the very first series with Gaynor Faye and again with Hayley Tamaddon and Beth Tweddle

 The star reckons there are a couple of celebs lined up for the new series who already have a great chance of winning

Dancing On Ice's Dan Whiston on why the show's not CURSED like Strictly Come Dancing    During an exclusive chat with Mirror Online, he said: "ITV flew me back and I did a big masterclass with all the celebs and we've got a great line up this year, we've ticked all the boxes

 "We've got the presenter, the pop star, the Love Islander, we've even got a movie star this year

Didi [Conn] could be another little Debbie McGee moment because she's great on the ice, I think she's one to watch

 "Also James Jordan is doing very well and he's really determined

 "All the boys this year are all really competitive with each other and that's really strong even in the early days

 "We've got a strong cast and they all want it, it's not about the pay cheque for any of them

"  He added: "I think Didi will surprise people because she's a more mature lady and people might not expect it

James Jordan and our Pussycat Doll [Melody Thornton] is very good on the ice, she's going to be one to watch for sure

   "We've got a level playing field at the minute, it's whoever puts the time in now, it'll pay off in time to come

"  Dan ended up taking a different role in the show due to his prior commitment of working as assistant director on show Holiday On Ice in Brussels

 And he said he was delighted when ITV created a new role for him

 He told us: "I will miss competing a little bit but I'm really excited to get stuck into something new because I've done it for so long

This will be my 11th series so I've done a decade of Dancing On Ice so it really feels the right time to move up, it feels the right thing so I'm very excited about getting this role

"  He added: "They've created a skating role for me as well so at some point in the show I'll be doing a big number, so it's lovely because I'm not hanging up my skates, I still get to perform but also to help create the magic as well

"  As someone who has won the show multiple times, Dan is ready to pass on his secrets for success

Dancing On Ice's Jason Gardiner slams Cheryl over 'questionable' judging credentials    He said: "I've been really lucky, I've had some amazing celebs and been lucky to win three times

 "The secret is to keep it fun

If you have a really good time with your celeb and you have a laugh and get on well, that celeb's going to want to come and spend more time on the ice, they're going to want to put the work in

 "If it becomes too serious too quick they'll think, 'Bugger this, I'm going home'

The secret is keep it fun and just have a good time because you won't get your time again once you're voted off that's it

 "The star of the show is the celeb you're working with so make them look the best they can

It's not about you, it's about them

"  We also asked Dan to weigh in on the ongoing debate of whether the show is tougher for the male or female celebrities taking part

 He told us: "It's a really good question, when you're lifted in the air as a celeb, she's not just lifted, she has to do her end and if she doesn't do what she needs to do it's very dangerous

   "For example, when I've done a 'headbanger' with a celebrity, they've had to know what they're doing because if she doesn't do what she's mean to do she'll smash her face in and it's very scary

 "Some people do say it must be easier for the girl getting lifted but it's very hard because they've got to do their end

 "If I say for example, 'Give me your left hand and I'm going to fling you upside down three times and you've got to land on one foot in my arms', if you give me the wrong hand you're going to hurt yourself

So there's a lot of pressure on the female celebs as well

 "I do take the point that maybe the boys have to work a little bit harder on their basic training at the beginning because they can't hide anything

 "They have to be strong on their feet before they can lift a girl up so they've got that extra to do but I would say as lifting goes and the trick goes it's a 50/50 affair, the girls have to be as strong as the boys

"  * Dancing On Ice kicks off on ITV on Sunday, January 6 at 6pm   Do you have a story to sell? Get in touch with us at webtv@trinitymirror

com or call us direct 0207 29 33033 Showbiz and TV editor's picks

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét