Welcome friends to another edition of Economic Update, a weekly program devoted
to the economic dimensions of our lives, jobs, incomes, debts, our own, those of our
children, those in the largest society we live in.
I'm your host Richard Wolff, I've been a professor of economics all my adult life
and I hope that that has prepared me well to present these weekly updates, to
get an idea of what's going on in the economy around us. I begin one more time
with the uber corporation I talk about them because it's important to
understand that the so called gig economy or the so-called startup economy
has another side to it which their publicity hides but which it's important
to understand first the stark facts that were recently released a year ago 2016
hackers broke in to the uber system and thereby got all kinds of information
credit card numbers addresses all of that of get this 57 million uber
customers and drivers a year ago we learned about it over a year later it
was hidden by the uber company they knew all about it for a year but the news
gets worse a ransom was demanded by the hackers in order not to use and go
public with what they had achieved and the uber corporation paid them $100,000
good deal for the hackers to hide all of this but as these things will it came to
light what does this mean well it means that uber lied to us by not telling us
57 million of us that our information had been compromised for a year
lord knows how many people's lives were messed up in terms of their
and a whole lot of other things like that over that period of time a ransom
was paid that's how the corporation handled it well let's see what that
means here's what it probably means without having the books of the uber
company available you can't be sure but it probably means that companies like
uber which accumulate all kinds of very valuable information or to spend a lot
of money making sure these private bits of information are secure
clearly uber didn't do that and maybe uber calculates like no doubt other ones
of these companies do that it's cheaper to pay off the hackers $100,000 then to
make sure that our information given freely to uber is secure and this leads
to the general conclusion about companies like uber basically uber
provides taxi rides that's right they do the same thing that a taxi company does
you get involved with them you call them you hail them and they take you where
you want to go that's what uber does only this is a difference years ago when
taxi rides began and people discovered that the taxi might not be safe might
not be maintained correctly might not have the adequate insurance it needs we
discovered that the private taxi company would shave the corners to make more
money and so to protect the public we instituted commissions and the
Commission's made the taxi companies take the necessary precautions and that
of course is expensive so what the Commission's did was set the taxi rides
at a price that would pay the driver and pay the company enough money to meet the
demands of the commissions for our safety
all that uber is is a way around the safety and thereby they can compete with
taxis because they don't have to maintain the same
50 they don't have to maintain the vetting of the driver they don't have to
maintain the insurances that a regular taxi company has so they could make more
profits which they did and we pay the price
you know how the drivers aren't as good the insurance isn't as good the
maintenance isn't as good and now we discover that the security of our
information isn't very good taxi companies didn't accumulate that
information we didn't have to be protected now we discover like with
taxis we need a commission to oversee this company because in its drive for
profits it sacrifices the public and that's a problem with a capitalist
system where profit is the bottom line not serving the customer that's only the
means to get the bottom line up there and we can see what that means my next
update has to do with sugar sugar is a crucial item in the diet of the United
States and over many other countries sugar produces that is the capitalist
companies that raise process package and all the rest sugar have an association
like all industry groups it's called the sugar Research Foundation it turns out
in an article published in the academic or scientific journal PLoS Biology
November 21st of this year they reported on research of three professors at the
University of California in San Francisco that back in the 1960s the
sugar Research Foundation sponsored some scientific research to look into the
question what is the relationship between sugar consumption on the one
hand heart disease and bladder cancer on the other and when that research began
to suggest to scientists that there was a connection that would be important to
let everybody know about the sugar Research Foundation abruptly stopped the
research stopped the funding of the research and so in the intervening half
a century we have been kept in the dark about that
potentially crucial research obviously because it was not in the interest of
the sugar businesses to rescue us from what they were doing and making profits
it's another sign of the danger of putting the food production of our
society in the hands of companies whose first objective is profits not the
safety or nutritional value of what they produce my third update today has to do
this will come as a big surprise with President Donald Trump I know you
perhaps have already heard enough for more than enough about what he's doing
but this is something you may not have heard about you know in the past
politicians knew it was appropriate to keep a certain distance between
themselves as political office holders and business interests about making
money with mr. Trump the notion of keeping a distance has disappeared and
in a way that's very helpful because you can see what was kind of hidden before
nice and clearly presented to you so I'm gonna go through five recent business
activities that mr. Trump has been involved in because I think it's an
important part of understanding what the leadership of this country now involves
number one in New York City there is a Trump Soho Hotel in lower Manhattan it
is having a hard time it turns out that New Yorkers and people visiting New York
seem not to like to see the Trump name on the hotel and so they haven't been
going there occupancy rates are poor money is not being made and so a divorce
has been arranged between the Trump Organization and that hotel so that it
won't be the Trump Hotel anymore because that's the strategy of how to make this
hotel pay score one again mr. Trump's financial interest here's
another part of that story that hotel is partly a hotel and partly a set of
condominium apartments the condominium owners have together sued the Trump
Organization because they claim in order to buy those co-op apartments they were
given figures by the Trump Organization which inflated the amount of money being
spent and the number of these apartments that were being sold to create the
impression that there was a groundswell of demand for these choice pieces of
real estate turns out that those numbers weren't accurate at least that's the
claim of the condo owners living in the same building but now it gets juicier
let's turn to the following statistic which I have to admit when I first
encountered it was so overwhelmingly I did a double and triple check just to
make sure the numbers are right mr. Trump has been president for roughly 400
days as we produce this program listen to this on 100 days out of the 400 he's
been president he visited one or more of his own properties let me explain what
this means on a trip to some foreign country he makes stops along the way
not because he has business to do in terms of being the president it's
because he's got with him an army of press people who will take good pictures
of him at this hotel that golf course this hotel and golf course this is
publicity that would cost millions if it were paid for but it's on your dime and
my dime because he's traveling in the presidential jet if he did it once in a
blue moon you'd think it was kind of tasteless he did it 100
days out of the 400 he's been a president this is a systematic
self-promotion of his business interests in the month of November 2017 we have a
new business on the Internet it's called Trump store.com
it sells hats polos and other golf gear with the Trump name on it
I want to let that sink in and now the last one Republican Party groups have
decided it's a good idea to locate their events at the properties owned by the
president so the last one I heard of and so I decided to bring it to your
attention in early November of this year at
mar-a-lago in Florida the Republican attorneys general Association of the
United States had a dinner with their most important corporate donors it cost
one hundred and twenty five thousand dollars per person to attend this event
and it was for a weekend at mar-a-lago so all that money had to be paid to mr.
Trump who owns the facility this is a level of mixing politics and business
that goes beyond what we've had in the past I'll leave you to draw your own
conclusions. Before going on to the remaining updates, I want to remind you
we maintain two websites that I want to urge you to visit, and make use of.
rdwolff with two F's dot com and democracyatwork.info that's all one word
democracyatwork.info. There's a great deal of material that we load up
to these websites every day, it's there to enhance to elaborate to extend what
we do on this program it's available to you 24/7 no charge
whatsoever these websites allow you also to communicate with us what you like and
don't like about the program what you'd like to see us do these websites allow
you to follow us on Facebook Twitter and Instagram to see what we're doing on
YouTube and so on it's a resource that we make available
to partner with you in making the reach of all that we do even greater than it
would be if it was just us alone rather than in partnership with you for those
of you that are listening to this program if you would like to see the
televised version of the program please visit us at patreon.com that's patr
yo n patreon.com slash economic update for the television version of the
program returning to our economic updates I want to talk about what is for
me a personal tragedy because I live in New York City the tragedy I'm talking
about is the subway system this is a fundamental public service
millions of people rely upon this institution to get to and from work to
get to and from business jobs friends associates family members you name it
it's the way you move around a big city scattered across five big boroughs but
the subway system in this the largest city in America the city most visited by
folks from other parts of the world let me tell you about the conditions that
it's in first daily ridership 5.7 million people use the subways every day
that is double the number of people who used it 20 years ago in other words we
have an enormous increase in the need for the reliance on the social
importance of this mass transportation system
the percentage of weekday trains that reach their destinations on time 65%
that is the worst performance of any major transit system anywhere in the
world including other cities in the United States there are many
transportation subway systems around the world that have records in the high 90%
of on-time performance there is no excuse no necessity for this dereliction
of service to the public the amount of money that the MTA that's the authority
that funds the subways gave to the subways this year
is 250 million dollars in 1990 that's 27 years ago it gave the authority in
today's dollars 1 billion dollars let me make it clear to you we've doubled the
number of people that use the subway and we've reduced by 75% the amount of
actual purchasing power dollars we've given them so there's no mystery about
why the subways are late there's no mystery for those of you that are not
familiar with the New York subway system no mystery about the fact that there are
rats that it is dirty beyond all words that it is noisy that their bathrooms
are not you cannot even think about going in there they're locked anyway
because nobody does on and on and on what a travesty and it makes a mockery
of efficiency that word used to describe American capitalism
there's no efficiency here millions of hours of work time are lost by people
who are stuck on slow trains or don't get to work at all where's that
accounted for nowhere and here's the reason politicians don't spend the money
to maintain this subway and why not because if they maintain the subway
they'd have to get the money by raising taxes they dare not do it to the court
operations and the rich because they threaten to support politicians against
the ones who might do this politicians who won't do it so the politicians in
office are afraid to tax corporations and the rich and likewise they are
afraid to tax the mass of people who already spend too much money on the
subway ride who are already taxed beyond what they can care for and tolerate and
they are afraid of losing their votes so the way the politicians work in this
crazy system is by not taxing the money and therefore saving by not maintaining
the quality and the efficiency of the subway system they hope they can get
through four years on the Commission go on to a higher political office and let
the declining subway become the next politicians headache that's not a
problem of these individuals that's a problem of a system that works this way
this is a crazy way to function it isn't efficient it isn't appropriate it isn't
fair because obviously the people who are not paying the taxes are very
different from the people who have to rely on an unstable unsafe unsanitary
subway system every day of their working lives I turn next to Britain not because
I'm only interested in speaking to British people about their situation but
I'm doing it because Britain's reaction to the crisis of 2008 is rather close to
that of the United States imposing an austerity on the mass of people getting
a recovery in quotation marks mainly for the corporations and the rich and
letting it bypass the mass of people but focusing in the newspapers owned by
corporations and the rich on the recovery they are enjoying with the
little clever maneuver of suggesting everybody is enjoying it when it's not
the case the latest statistics from the Institute of Fiscal Studies which is the
Office of Budget Responsibility the leading official of the British
government indicates that household disposable incomes will fall for an
unprecedented 19 straight quarters between 2015 and 2020 in other words we
are now in the middle of the longest sustained decline in the household
income of the British working class in the history of the country that's what's
called a recovery that only benefits a few at the expense of the many this
makes it the worst decade in the performance of the British economy
according to the Bloomberg News Service on the 23rd of November it makes it the
worst performance decade in the British economy since 1812 when Napoleon invaded
Russia there's no way that you can do anything other than shake your head
about such a performance the last item I want to talk about is in a way profound
it has to do with Norway a very little country under 6 million actually 5.3
million people in other words the country of Norway is a much smaller
population than say the city of New York all by itself but the country of Norway
was lucky in a particular way and luck has an awful lot to do with the economic
story I'm about to tell you a couple of weeks ago Norway shook up the world
market in gas and oil why well to understand this you have to understand
that some decades ago oil was discovered in Norway and the ocean around Norway
good luck for Norway a lot of oil what Norway did understandably was
become rich wealthy grow with the revenue from all the oil but the revenue
was so enormous that the Norwegians understood like other countries in this
situation that eventually the oil would run out and if they made their entire
economic well-being dependent on oil when the oil went out so would their
economic well-being so here's what they did they established something called a
sovereign wealth fund what that is is money set aside in this case by the
country of Norway part of the revenue they got from the oil and gas they were
lucky enough to be sitting on wouldn't be spent for the ongoing functions of
government wouldn't be given to private enterprises would be run by the
government as a fund to be invested in companies around the world and to
generate their by a growing stream of income from a growing pot of wealth that
would sustain the people of Norway long after the oil and gas they had was used
up and that is now in excess of a trillion dollars worth of Norway's fund
so what shook up the world the decision of Norway to sell all of the stocks in
oil and gas companies that their sovereign wealth had invested in why
because they think the era of oil and gas is coming to an end they said so
they don't want to be invested in the shares of oil and gas company as the
world's use of oil and gas fades out and we shift to solar energy to wind energy
to all of the other forms of generating energy that are either going to be
cheaper or safer or both and the Norwegians even though their economy
still depends on oil we're smart enough and careful enough to know
if you pardon the pun which way the wind is blowing in terms of their investments
something that other investors in oil and gas everywhere in the world should
be thinking about something that half the states in the United States whose
incomes are dependent on oil and gas maybe ought to be thinking about that's
why it shook everybody up but here's what I want to talk to you about the
absurdity of this and this is not a critique of Norway they're doing what
this system makes reasonable to do and I hope you've understood that from my
description 5.3 million people are deciding through their government what
to do with trillions of dollars of wealth is that democratic they are a
tiny point one percent of the world but they owned over almost 2% of the world's
stocks of corporations because they happen to be located where there happens
to be oil this is a very strange way of using the resources of this planet it's
like a game of lottery you happen to get the oil under your country you can shape
how the world works for a hundred years and if you happen not to you lose no
wonder then the world is riven with conflict and tension and envy and
bitterness this is no way to use the resources of a planet it ought to have
been done in a democratic way with a sharing of resources across populations
so we're all in this together and not at each other with a kind of slavish
subordination to private property and the happenstance of geology and
geography what a way to organize a world economy everybody on your own everybody
preserving their little piece of the action their little profit no matter how
chaotic so a decision by 5.3 million people in Norway
we'll change the prices of oil and gas the energy we all rely on for 7 billion
people who are the dog and Norway is the tail who's wagging who here that is an
irrational way for capitalism to develop the world economy and that's the most
important part of this remarkable story from Norway we've come to the end of the
first half of economic update I hope you have found that these economic updates
shed some light on what is going on shed some light on where we're headed and
they represent an important kind of economic news unfortunately not reported
on in any way that could and should be the case for an informed public stay
with us we will be right back
you

For more infomation >> This there are 5 markers of the user message which not know. - Duration: 4:05. 

Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét