REPUBLICAN LAWMAKERS HAVE VOTED TO ESSENTIALLY GET RID OF
AN OBAMA ERA ACTION THAT WOULD BAN SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL
INDIVIDUALS FROM OBTAINING LETHAL WEAPONS, GUNS TO BE
SPECIFIC.
THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT BARACK OBAMA HAD WORKED ON FOR A
FEW YEARS AND IT FINALLY WAS PUT INTO PLACE CLOSE TO THE END
OF HIS SECOND TURN AND NOW HOUSE REPUBLICANS HAVE DECIDED,
NO, WE ARE NOT INTO THIS NOT ALLOWING MENTALLY ILL
PEOPLE TO HAVE GUNS THING, SO LET'S GO AHEAD AND REPEAL IT.
TO GIVE YOU THE DETAILS, THE RULE WHICH WAS FINALIZED BY
THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION IN DECEMBER,
BAND SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFICIARIES FROM BUYING
GUNS IF THEIR DISABILITY PAYMENTS ARE HANDLED BY AN
OUTSIDE PARTY DUE TO THEIR MARKED SUBNORMAL INTELLIGENCE,
OR MENTAL ILLNESS, INCOMPETENCY, CONDITION, OR DISEASE.
THIS INCLUDES PEOPLE WHO HAVE SEVERE ANXIETY OR INDIVIDUALS
WHO HAVE SCHIZOPHRENIA AND THE IDEA IS HEY, THERE SHOULD BE
LIMITS TO WHO WE ALLOW TO PURCHASE THESE TYPES OF
GUNS AND IF WE ARE WORRIED THAT SOMEONE WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA
MY I DON'T KNOW OPEN FIRE AND KILL AND IT IS INDIVIDUALS
MAYBE WE SHOULD LIMIT THEIR ABILITY TO BUY THESE GUNS.
BUT NO, ACCORDING TO REPORTS, THE REPUBLICAN-CONTROLLED
HOUSE VOTED 235 TO 180 AND AN APPARENT EFFORT TO IMPROVE
GUN OWNERSHIP UNDER PRESIDENT TRUMP.
THE RULE AFFECTED NEARLY 75,000
SOCIAL SECURITY RECIPIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH MENTAL HEALTH
CONDITIONS SUCH AS EXTREME ANXIETY AND SCHIZOPHRENIA,
AND ARE CONSIDERED INCAPABLE OF MANAGING THEIR OWN AFFAIRS.
THERE WAS A REPRESENTATIVE BY THE NAME OF JOHN ROSCOE WHO
WANTED TO DEFEND THE HOUSES DECISION TO VOTE THIS WAY.
IT
WILL NOW GO TO THE SENATE AND IF THE SENATE VOTES TO GET RID OF
THIS RULE, OF COURSE TRUMP WOULD PROBABLY SIGN INTO LAW.
CNN'S ALLISON CAMMARATA SPEAKS THIS REPRESENTATIVE AND
LISTEN TO HIM AS HE STRUGGLES TO EXPLAIN HIMSELF.
AS I UNDERSTAND IT, IT INVOLVES 75,000 PEOPLE WITH
MENTAL DISORDERS SO SEVERE THAT THEY CANNOT WORK, AND THEY
HAVE SOMEONE ELSE MANAGE THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS.
HOW DOES IT MAKE SENSE TO LET THEM HAVE GUNS?
WELL, THIS IS A NEW CHANGE BY PRESIDENT OBAMA, MIDNIGHT
REGULATION ON HIS WAY OUT THE DOOR.
IT SHOULD BE SUBJECT
TO A FULL DEBATE, DISCUSSION AND THE HOUSE IS VOTED ON IT
YESTERDAY AND VOTED TO REPEAL THAT RULE.
IF SOMEONE HAS A MENTAL ILLNESS SO SEVERE THAT THEY
CANNOT WORK, SHOULD THEY FEEL HAVE A GUN?
WILL THE QUESTION IS, IS SOMEONE ABLE TO HAVE A GUN AT
THE SAME TIME THEY ARE RECEIVING SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY?
YOU CAN TAKE A LOOK AT HOW THOSE DECISIONS ARE BEING MADE THE
DISABILITY FOR MENTAL ILLNESS TO
FOR SEVEN YEARS OF PRESIDENT OBAMA'S TERM IS FINE AND HE
COMES OUT WITH THEM IN A REGULAR AT THIS POINT, MAYBE EVEN
MEMBERS OF HIS OWN PARTY DON'T SUPPORT SEEMS LIKE ANOTHER
THING THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS DONE WHILE LEAVING THE
WHITE HOUSE TO TRY TO GUM UP THE WORKS AS HE LEAVES THE
SENATOR, ARE YOU COMFORTABLE WITH SOMEONE HAVING A
MENTAL DISABILITY AND HAVING A GUN?
YOU CAN TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT THE CONSTITUTION SAYS WHICH IS
WHAT I DO AS A PHYSICIAN WHO SPENT LOTS OF TIME WORKING WITH
PATIENTS WITH ALL DIFFERENT BACKGROUNDS, THERE ARE CLEARLY
PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN LABELED ONE WAY OR ANOTHER AND I AM NOT
COMFORTABLE WITH A MIDNIGHT RECOMMENDATION BY THE PRESIDENT.
GOOD JOB ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS/NOT ANSWERING THE
QUESTION AT ALL.
DO YOU FILL COMFORTABLE WITH PEOPLE WHO HAVE SEVERE
MENTAL ILLNESSES ACCESSING THESE GUNS?
YOU WILL ANSWER THE QUESTION PROBABLY BECAUSE THE NRA IS
IN HIS POCKET AND OF COURSE HE DOESN'T WANT TO LOSE THEIR
FUNDING OR THEIR SUPPORT.
ANYWAY, LET ME OPEN IT UP TO THE PANEL THE
I KNOW WE ARE MAYBE NOW THE BIGGEST FANS OF CNN ALL THE
TIME HOWEVER I REALLY GOTTA HAND IT TO THE INTERVIEWER TO
HOLDING HANDS ANSWER QUESTION.
SHE DID EVERYTHING SHE COULD HAVE DONE TO TRY TO GET THE
ANSWER.
REALLY WHAT IS THE BASELINE QUESTION WITH THIS LOSS.
SOMETHING THAT BOTHERS ME ABOUT HOW THE REPUBLICANS ARE
SPINNING THIS RIGHT NOW IS THAT THEY ARE SAYING THAT THIS
WAS A LAST-MINUTE LAW THAT OBAMA SIGNED INTO PLACE.
ACTUALLY, THEY STARTED WORKING ON THIS IN 2012
AND REPORTS ON SIOUX CITY HOOK MASSACRE.
THIS IS A LAST MINUTE THING THAT OBAMA SPRUNG ON THE HOUSE.
THIS IS SOMETHING THEY HAD BEEN NEGOTIATING FOR A WHILE SO FOR
THIS GUY TO SAY, WELL, FOR HIM TO SAY, I WILL CALM THIS GUY, I
DON'T KNOW, FOR HIM TO SAY THIS WAS SLID IN AND WE HAVEN'T
BEEN ABLE TO DEBATE IT PROPERLY, YOU'VE HAD SINCE 2012.
IT IS ABSOLUTELY MISLEADING AND I DO LIKE CNN FOR AT LEAST
TAKING HIM TO TASK ON RESPONDING TO THE BASELINE QUESTION,
OF WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED HERE.
IT IS VERY DANGEROUS AND
ALSO IT IS SUPER PETTY OF THE NRA.
IT IS ONLY 75,000 PEOPLE.
RELAX.
75,000 PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT MENTALLY COMPETENT ENOUGH
TO HANDLE THEIR OWN AFFAIRS.
WHY WOULD YOU GIVE THEM THE RIGHT TO HAVE A GUN WHICH
IS A LETHAL WEAPON?
I DON'T THINK I AM VERY, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE RIGHT WORD IS
BY I AM NOT A CRAZY ADVOCATE OF BANNING GUNS.
I WANT COMMON SENSE GUN LEGISLATION THAT JUST TRIES TO
PROTECT PEOPLE AND IN THIS CASE, IT IS LIKE ñ REPUBLICANS WILL
ONLY TALK ABOUT WE NEED TO FOCUS ON MENTAL HEALTH AND ALL THESE
ILLNESSES AFTER THERE IS A MASS SHOOTING AND THERE IS A
TRAGIC EVENT HERE IN THE UNITED STATES AND THEY WILL USE AS
A SCAPEGOAT BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO TALK ABOUT GUN
CONTROL BUT THEY GENUINELY DON'T CARE ABOUT MENTAL HEALTH
CARE AND THEY CERTAINLY DON'T CARE ABOUT PROTECTING
PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES.
IT'S FUNNY HOW ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY ARE LIKE WE CAN
DISCRIMINATE AGAINST PEOPLE WHO HAVE DISABILITIES OR MENTAL
HEALTH ISSUES.
WE REALLY NEED TO LOOK OUT FOR THEM/WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE
CAN SOLVE MANY GUNS AS POSSIBLE SO WE CAN MAKE THE NRA HAPPY TO
THERE IS A FORMULA FOR DOING THESE TYPES OF THINGS THAT.
WE TALKED ABOUT PROPAGANDA EARLIER.
YOU WANT TO CHANGE REALITY, WHAT YOU DO IS YOU STRETCH OUT
THIS TYPE OF LEGISLATION FOR YEARS AND SAY HAPPENED AT
THE LAST 2ND.
SAME THING THAT HAPPENED WITH THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.
CHANGE THE WAY CERTAIN STATES ARE CERTAIN GOVERNMENTS
WOULDN'T ACCEPT ASPECTS OF THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND
THEN THEY SAY THIS ISN'T WORKING.
PRESENT OBAMA IS GIVING US HIS GARBAGE REGULATION OR
LEGISLATION AND WAS A COMES IN A DOESN'T WORK.
YOU HAVE TO ACCEPT ASPECTS OF IT FOR TO WORK AND THEN THEY SAY IT
IS HIS FAULT.
IN THIS CASE YOU STRETCH IT OUT AND THEN YOU SAY SPRUNG IT
ON THAT.
THE SAME THING WITH THE SUPREME COURT.
UTERUS CHANGE REALITY AND SAY TO SOMEONE ELSE'S FAULT EYES YOU
TOUCHED ON, THIS GUY BRINGS UP THE BENEFITS OF PEOPLE WITH
SOCIAL SECURITY AS AT THE REPUBLICANS CARE ABOUT
SOCIAL SECURITY THAT YOU MEAN THOSE PEOPLE WITH THE TITLE
MESSY DISDAIN EVERYDAY?
YOU EXPECT TO GET MONEY BACK FROM THE GOVERNMENT FOR
THINGS THAT YOU PAID FOR?
HOW DARE YOU!
THAT DOESNíT GO TO YOU, IT GOES TO THEIR
CORPORATE DONORS.
LASTLY, THERE IS AN ASPECT, I READ THE NRA STATEMENT OR PART
OF THE STATEMENT ABOUT THIS AND HOW HAPPY THEY ARE AND THE
TALKING POINTS THAT THEY FEED TO THEIR MINIONS.
ONE OF THE POINTS THAT THEY LEAD TO WAS THERE IS A PERSON IN PART
OF THE MENTAL HEALTH I GUESS AN ADVOCACY GROUP AND HE SAID THIS
ADDS TO THE STIGMA OF MENTAL ILLNESS MEANING KEEPING THEM
FROM GUNS.
IT CREATED DISSONANCE FOR MENTALLY ILL PEOPLE TO GO
GET THEIR BENEFITS.
THEY'RE PUTTING ABOUT THESE WALL STUDS LIKE PUTTING IN
PERSON IN FRONT OF YOU TO PROTECT YOU FROM ANY
CRITICISM YOU MAY RECEIVE FOR YOUR BAD LEGISLATION AND
CONTINUE TO USE THEM FOR YOUR OWN BENEFIT AND LATER WHEN
THEY ACTUALLY NEED YOUR SUPPORT, YOU THROW THEM ASIDE.
IS A PLAYBOOK THAT I'VE SEEN SO MANY TIMES THAT WE WATCH A
LOT OF THESE CLOSER PEOPLE SPOTTING BOLSHEVIK AND
NEVER ACTUALLY GIVING THE RIGHT ANSWER.
THEY JUST GET BY THE
THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN DEEMED THEY ARE
INCAPABLE OF MANAGING THEIR OWN FINANCIAL AFFAIRS.
THEY CAN EVEN CATCH THEIR OWN CHECKS AND YET, THEY SHOULD
BE ABLE TO TURN IN THEIR MONEY OR WHATEVER SO THEY CAN BUY
A GUN.
IT JUST DOESN'T HOLD ANY WATER.
JUST REMEMBER THAT AT THE END OF THE DAY.
75,000 PEOPLE WHICH IS REALLY A BLIP IN THE BUCKET IN THE GRAND
SCHEME OF THINGS WHICH IS WHY THINK IT IS SO PETTY AND
STUPID, THESE PEOPLE CANNOT GO OUT AND CASH THE CHECKS.
THEY ARE DEEMED INCAPABLE OF DOING SO AND YET THEY ARE
NOW FULLY CAPABLE OF OWNING AND OPERATING A FIREARMS I JUST
THINK ABOUT THAT.
THAT SHOULD THAT MAKE ANY SENSE.
THERE'S ALSO A LIST OF PEOPLE WHO AREN'T ABLE TO GET
FIREARMS, LIKE BALANCED OUR TIMES FELONS ARE PEOPLE WHO
BEEN IN PRISON ALL FEW TIMES FOR DRUG POSSESSION.
WHERE IS ADVOCACY GROUP FOR THOSE GUYS THAT WAS A SENATOR
SAYING YOU ARE TAKING AWAY THE RIGHTS OF AMERICANS WHO HAVE
PAID THEIR FINES AND DONE THEIR TIME AND OTHER CAN'T GET A GUN.
WHERE'S THE OUTRAGE?
THEY DON'T CARE.
THOSE OF THE WRONG KIND OF PEOPLE.
For more infomation >> So You Want To Be A Business Owner?!... Part 2 of 2 - Duration: 9:59. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét